Git Product home page Git Product logo

sdl_evolution's People

Contributors

abyzhynar avatar agaliuzov avatar akihiro-miyazaki avatar ashwink11 avatar asm09fsu avatar atiwari9 avatar bilal-alsharifi avatar brandon-salahat-tm avatar brettywhite avatar crokita avatar dboltovskyi avatar icollin avatar jack-byrne avatar jacobkeeler avatar joeljfischer avatar joeygrover avatar jordynmackool avatar kazuki-sugimoto avatar kshala-ford avatar luxoftakutsan avatar mrapitis avatar nicoleyarroch avatar robinmk avatar shiniwat avatar shoamano83 avatar shobhitad avatar shohei-kawano avatar theresalech avatar yang1070 avatar zhouxin627 avatar

Stargazers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

Watchers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

sdl_evolution's Issues

[Rejected] SDL 0010 - ButtonName Additions for Navigation Applications

Hello SDL community,

The review of "ButtonName Additions for Navigation Applications" begins now and runs through September 6, 2016. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0010-spec-buttonname-additions-for-navigation-applications.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#27

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Joel Fischer

SDL iOS Maintainer - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0008 - Base iOS Version to 7.0

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Base iOS Version to 7.0" begins now and runs through September 6, 2016. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0008-ios-7-0-minimum.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#25

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Joel Fischer

SDL iOS Maintainer - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0007 - iOS Enforce ObjC Generics

Hello SDL community,

The review of "iOS Enforce ObjC Generics" begins now and runs through August 30, 2016. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0007-ios-objc-generics.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#20

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Joel Fischer

SDL iOS Maintainer - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0025 - Stream File Manager Uploads from Disk

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Stream File Manager Uploads from Disk" begins now and runs through February 14, 2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0025-ios-filemanager-stream-from-disk.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#87

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0031 - Mobile Projection

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Mobile Projection" begins now and runs through February 28, 2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0031-mobile-projection.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#97

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[Rejected] SDL 0001 - Secured Preferences

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Secured Preferences" begins now and runs through August 10, 2016 (EDT). The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0001-secured-preferences.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews
should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#3

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?

Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Joel Fischer

SDL iOS Maintainer - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted with Revisions] SDL 0022 - Reduce RSVP default security

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Reduce RSVP default security" begins now and runs through December 20, 2016. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0022-android-rsvp-off.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#60

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0045 - External Policy Manager

Hello SDL community,

The review of "External Policy Manager" begins now and runs through April 4, 2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0045-external-policy-manager.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#134

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0032 - Delegate Support for all onHMIStatus State Changes

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Delegate Support for all onHMIStatus State Changes" begins now and runs through March 7, 2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0032-on-hmi-status-state-changes.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#101

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted with Revisions] SDL 0027 - Increase Specificity of Handler Events

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Increase Specificity of Handler Events" begins now and runs through February 14, 2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0027-ios-specify-handlers.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#89

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0023 - Update Mobile API to Include Mandatory Flag on Parameters

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Update Mobile API to Include Mandatory Flag on Parameters" begins now and runs through February 7, 2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0023-update-mobile-api-mandatory-flag.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#82

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0035 - Audio Data Handler for SDLPerformAudioPassThru

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Audio Data Handler for SDLPerformAudioPassThru" begins now and runs through 3/21/2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0035-audio-pass-thru-handler.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#112

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Paul Elsila
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0012 - iOS Library Remove Siphon Server

Hello SDL community,

The review of "iOS Library Remove Siphon Server" begins now and runs through September 20, 2016. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0012-ios-library-remove-siphon.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#34

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Joel Fischer

SDL iOS Maintainer - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0009 - iOS Library Prefer Nonatomic Properties

Hello SDL community,

The review of "iOS Library Prefer Nonatomic Properties" begins now and runs through September 6, 2016. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0009-ios-library-prefer-nonatomic.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#26

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Joel Fischer

SDL iOS Maintainer - Livio
[email protected]

[Rejected] SDL 0047 - Manual layout for SDLLockScreenViewController

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Manual layout for SDLLockScreenViewController" begins now and runs through April 11, 2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0047-manual-lockscreen-layout-ios.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#142

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0041 - Provide AppIcon resumption across app registration requests

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Provide AppIcon resumption across app registration requests" begins now and runs through March 28, 2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0041-appicon-resumption.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#127

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0020 - Remove SDLRPCRequestFactory

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Remove SDLRPCRequestFactory" begins now and runs through October 18, 2016. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0020-ios-remove-rpcrequestfactory.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#50

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[Rejected] SDL 0015 - Android Studio IDE SDL Plugins

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Android Studio IDE SDL Plugins" begins now and runs through October 4, 2016. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0015-android-studio-sdl-plugin.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#43

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Joel Fischer

SDL iOS Maintainer - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0026 - Move to Android Studio

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Move to Android Studio" begins now and runs through February 14, 2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0026-android_move_to_android_studio.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#88

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[In Review] SDL 0017 - iOS Library Protocol Layer Should Not Be Public

Hello SDL community,

The review of "iOS Library Protocol Layer Should Not Be Public" begins now and runs through October 4, 2016. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0017-ios-protocol-layer-nonpublic.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#45

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Joel Fischer

SDL iOS Maintainer - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0021 - Remove SDLTTSChunkFactory

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Remove SDLTTSChunkFactory" begins now and runs through October 25, 2016. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0021-ios-remove-sdlttschunkfactory.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#53

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0024 -Minimum iOS Version to 8.0

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Base iOS Version to 8.0" begins now and runs through February 7, 2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0024-ios-8-0-minimum.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#83

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0016 - iOS Library Make Transport Classes Private and Cleaner

Hello SDL community,

The review of "iOS Library Make Transport Classes Private and Cleaner" begins now and runs through October 4, 2016. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0016-ios-library-transport-private-cleanup.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#44

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Joel Fischer

SDL iOS Maintainer - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0034 - Rename Cocoapods Project to "SmartDeviceLink"

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Rename Cocoapods Project to "SmartDeviceLink"

" begins now and runs through 3/21/2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0034-ios-cocoapods-rename.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#111

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Paul Elsila
Livio
[email protected]

[Rejected] SDL 0002 - Turn by Turn Mobile Managers

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Turn-by-Turn Mobile Managers" begins now and runs through August 23, 2016. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0002-turn-by-turn-mobile-managers.md
Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#11

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Joel Fischer

SDL iOS Maintainer - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0011 - iOS Library RPCs conform to NSCopying

Hello SDL community,

The review of "iOS Library RPCs conform to NSCopying" begins now and runs through September 20, 2016. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0011-ios-library-conform-to-nscopying.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#33

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Joel Fischer

SDL iOS Maintainer - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0043 - Move to the new C++11 standard.

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Move to the new C++11 standard." begins now and runs through April 4, 2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0043-upgrade-c++-standard.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#132

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0014 - Adding Audio File Playback to TTSChunk

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Adding Audio File Playback to TTSChunk" begins now and runs through October 4, 2016. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0014-adding-audio-file-playback-to-ttschunk.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#42

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Joel Fischer

SDL iOS Maintainer - Livio
[email protected]

Update LICENSE to SDLC 2017

Current: License file includes "Copyright (c) 2016 Ford Motor Company, " and "Neither the name of Ford Motor Company nor the names..."

Expected: License file includes "Copyright (c) 2017, SmartDeviceLink Consortium, Inc." and "Neither the name of SmartDeviceLink Consortium, Inc. nor the names..."

[Accepted] SDL 0042 - SDL must transfer RPC’s with invalid image reference parameters to the HMI

Hello SDL community,

The review of "SDL must transfer RPC’s with invalid image reference parameters to the HMI" begins now and runs through March 28, 2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0042-transfer-invalid-image-rpc.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#128

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0040 - DTLS encryption

Hello SDL community,

The review of the revised proposal "DTLS encryption" begins now and runs through April 11, 2017. The original review of "DTLS encryption" occurred March 21, 2017 through March 28, 2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0040-DTLS-encryption.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#126

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0019 - iOS Library Proxy Layer Should Not Be Public

Hello SDL community,

The review of the revised proposal "iOS Library Proxy Layer Should Not Be Public" begins now and runs through February 7, 2017. The original review of "iOS Library Proxy Layer Should Not Be Public" occurred October 5, 2016 through October 19, 2016. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0019-ios-proxy-layer-nonpublic.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#48

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0046 - Implement logger abstraction

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Implement logger abstraction" begins now and runs through April 11, 2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0046-implement-logger-abstraction.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#141

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0003 - Last Mile Navigation

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Last Mile Navigation" begins now and runs through August 23, 2016. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0003-last-mile-navigation.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#12

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Joel Fischer

SDL iOS Maintainer - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0005 - iOS Use Correct Mutability on RPC Storage Properties

Hello SDL community,

The review of "iOS Use Correct Mutability on RPC Storage Properties" begins now and runs through August 30, 2016. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0005-ios-immutable-rpc-storage-properties.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#18

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Joel Fischer

SDL iOS Maintainer - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0030 - Redesign iOS Logging

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Redesign iOS Logging" begins now and runs through February 21, 2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0030-ios-logging-redesign.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#93

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,

Theresa Lech
Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0018 - iOS Library Use Nullability Annotations

Hello SDL community,

The review of "iOS Library Use Nullability Annotations" begins now and runs through October 4, 2016. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0018-ios-use-nullability-annotations.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#46

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Joel Fischer

SDL iOS Maintainer - Livio
[email protected]

[Rejected] SDL 0038 - Communication app activation during active embedded audio source or navigation

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Communication app activation during active embedded audio source or navigation" begins now and runs through March 28, 2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0038-Communication-app-activation.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#124

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0013 - iOS Remove SDLJsonEncoder & Decoder

Hello SDL community,

The review of "iOS Remove SDLJsonEncoder & Decoder" begins now and runs through September 20, 2016. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0013-ios-remove-json-encode-decode-classes.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#35

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Joel Fischer

SDL iOS Maintainer - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0044 - Use Boost library in SDL

Hello SDL community,

The review of the revised proposal "Use Boost library in SDL" begins now and runs through May 2, 2017. The original review of "Use Boost library in SDL" occurred March 28, 2017 through April 4, 2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0044-use-Boost-library.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#133

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0004 - SendLocation RPC Updates

Hello SDL community,

The review of "SendLocation RPC Updates" begins now and runs through August 23, 2016. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0004-sendlocation-updates.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#13

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Joel Fischer

SDL iOS Maintainer - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0037 - Expand Mobile putfile RPC

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Expand Mobile putfile RPC" begins now and runs through March 28, 2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0037-Expand-Mobile-putfile-RPC.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#123

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0029 - Multiple File Manager Transactions

#Hello SDL community,

The review of the revised proposal "Multiple File Manager Transactions" begins now and runs through February 28, 2017. The original review of "Multiple File Manager Transactions" occurred February 8, 2017 through February 14, 2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0029-ios-multiple-file-manager-transactions.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#91

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0028 - Add Potential Downsides to Template

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Add Potential Downsides to Template" begins now and runs through February 14, 2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0028-meta-template-potential-downsides.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#90

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted with Revisions] SDL 0033 - Streaming Media Manager 5.0

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Streaming Media Manager 5.0" begins now and runs through March 14, 2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0033-streaming-media-manager-update.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#103

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0036 - Up Android Target/Compile Version

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Up Android Target/Compile Version" begins now and runs through 3/21/2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0036-android-up_target-version.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#113

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Paul Elsila
[email protected]

[Accepted] SDL 0006 - iOS Stringly Typed Enums

Hello SDL community,

The review of "iOS Stringly Typed Enums" begins now and runs through August 30, 2016. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0006-ios-stringly-typed-enums.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#19

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Joel Fischer

SDL iOS Maintainer - Livio
[email protected]

[Accepted with Revisions] SDL 0048 - Add H.264 over RTP format support for video streaming

Hello SDL community,

The review of the revised proposal "Add H.264 over RTP format support for video streaming" begins now and runs through May 16, 2017. The original review of "Add H.264 over RTP format support for video streaming" occurred April 4 through April 11, 2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0048-H264-over-RTP-support-for-video-streaming.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#143

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

[Rejected] SDL 0039 - Retrieving the value of 'menuIcon' and 'menuTitle' parameters from .ini file

Hello SDL community,

The review of "Retrieving the value of 'menuIcon' and 'menuTitle' parameters from .ini file" begins now and runs through March 28, 2017. The proposal is available here:

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0039-'menuIcon'-menuTitle'-params.md

Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:

#125

What goes into a review?

The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:

  • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to SDL?
  • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of SDL?
  • If you have used competitors with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
  • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
    Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.

More information about the SDL evolution process is available at

https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md

Thank you,
Theresa Lech

Program Manager - Livio
[email protected]

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.