Comments (12)
@wjwwood I could take that off your plate if you want to
from rclpy.
Sure, it will be a few days until I get to it.
from rclpy.
Consider rewriting these tests using independent files for the listener side to fix flaky/failing tests on buildfarm.
Is rclpy.shutdown()
supposed to allow one to change the rmw_implementation or does that have to happen in a different process?
import rclpy
from rclpy.impl.rmw_implementation_tools import get_rmw_implementations
from rclpy.impl.rmw_implementation_tools import select_rmw_implementation
select_rmw_implementation('rmw_opensplice_cpp')
rclpy.init()
#do stuff
rclpy.shutdown()
select_rmw_implementation('rmw_connext_cpp')
throws:
raise ImplementationAlreadyImportedException()
Is that the expected behaviour ?
from rclpy.
I don't think it is currently possible. But this is an important use case often requested in ROS 1 which I think is important to support. The user should be able to init
, run stuff and shutdown
and then be able to start over again within the same process.
from rclpy.
this is a workaround, and I'm actually not sure if it would work, but: are global variables provided by modules cleaned up after an import goes out of scope?
for example, would this reset the rmw implementation singleton?
def test(rmw_implementation_name):
import rclpy
from rclpy.impl.rmw_implementation_tools import get_rmw_implementations
from rclpy.impl.rmw_implementation_tools import select_rmw_implementation
select_rmw_implementation(rmw_implementation_name)
rclpy.init()
#do stuff
rclpy.shutdown()
The longterm solution would be to add code to shutdown to set global implementation-related state back to None (https://github.com/ros2/rclpy/blob/master/rclpy/rclpy/impl/rmw_implementation_tools.py#L25-L27).
from rclpy.
I don't think it is currently possible. But this is an important use case often requested in ROS 1 which I think is important to support. The user should be able to init, run stuff and shutdown and then be able to start over again within the same process.
That is possible.
Being able to do:
- init
- shutdown
- init
Is different from:
- init
- shutdown
- change implementation
- init
The former should be possible in rclpy
as-is. I don't think supporting the latter is extremely important though it would be nice if it worked. I do not believe it will though because I don't know how importing two Python extensions with the same symbols will work. If you would post the traceback, you'd see the error comes up when you try to change implementations after doing init, which is the issue here, not doing an init/shutdown/init cycle.
from rclpy.
I don't think that the singleton gets reset on shutdown whether it's used
inside a function or globally.
Now that it's confirmed that this is a wanted feature, your solution seems
very suitable.
Thanks!
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Jackie Kay [email protected]
wrote:
this is a workaround, and I'm actually not sure if it would work, but: are
global variables provided by modules cleaned up after an import goes out of
scope?for example, would this reset the rmw implementation singleton?
def test(rmw_implementation_name):
import rclpy
from rclpy.impl.rmw_implementation_tools import get_rmw_implementations
from rclpy.impl.rmw_implementation_tools import select_rmw_implementation
select_rmw_implementation(rmw_implementation_name)
rclpy.init()
#do stuff
rclpy.shutdown()The longterm solution would be to add code to shutdown to set global
implementation-related state back to None (
https://github.com/ros2/rclpy/blob/master/rclpy/rclpy/impl/rmw_implementation_tools.py#L25-L27
).—
You are receiving this because you were assigned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#22 (comment)
from rclpy.
Yes indeed doing init -> shutdown -> init works with the current implementation. So we can currently shutdown and start again in the same process as long as you don't want to change implementation in between.
I don't see many use cases where people would want to change implementation like this. It's actually only useful for testing multiple rmw_implementations on our end. That's why I was wondering if I should just modify the tests to do this in separate processes or modify rclpy
to make it possible.
from rclpy.
I don't think we need a test for it if it's not a feature we are going to support.
from rclpy.
Sounds good to me.
from rclpy.
There are tests that test multiple implementations already by using the multiprocessing module. So you might look at those of you want to do it that way. But personally I think just having separate invocations of Python for each would be cleaner.
from rclpy.
Yes I think that separating them is cleaner too. Thanks for the feedback
from rclpy.
Related Issues (20)
- KeyError in ActionServer._execute_goal HOT 5
- [Feature] Static Type Checking With ament_mypy HOT 1
- Added optional TimerInfo to timer callback HOT 1
- :farmer: `test_guard_condition` failing consisntent in CycloneDDS HOT 2
- Add utility function to get datetime.datetime from Time HOT 1
- Decode ROS2 raw byte data using rclpy.serialization.deserialize_message HOT 3
- Rate object's destroy() does not destroy the underlying Timer object, leading to CPU usage explosion HOT 6
- Update the executor to not throw ExternalShutdownException
- Make nodes, publishers, subscriptions, services, clients, action servers, action clients Python context managers HOT 1
- aarch64 cross compiling HOT 9
- Executors mishandle invalid waitables HOT 4
- context.on_shutdown is never called HOT 7
- Bad interaction between `torch.compile` and `MultiThreadedExecutor` HOT 1
- First Time Contributors Documentation (CONTRIBUTING.md) HOT 2
- Python message with uint32 Assertion `PyLong_Check(field)' failed HOT 2
- Memory leak in ActionServer. ```taken_data = self._handle.take_goal_request``` HOT 4
- [Bug] error when node created with rclpy.node.Node HOT 1
- Async tasks are processed in LIFO not FIFO HOT 4
- Incompatibility with calling spin_until_future_complete while in callback HOT 11
- Logging with `rclpy` to file misses messages unless accompanied by a consistent stream HOT 2
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from rclpy.