Hi Pierre~ I'm quite attracted by your awesome PhysX 4.1 showreel on ytb, but PEEL seems still remain old since long before.

I'm recently working on physically based animation, and get interested in PhysX 4.1. I'm very interested how to take advantages of PhysX 4.1 to make awesome physX effects like yours~ so I wonder if there would be any newer PEEL release in the future?

thx for your awesome work!

you removed all the callback, the new test I added, and you did even set collision flag.
you did the same thing Adrian Boeing and Dirk Gregorius did whet the wrote PAL to promote Bullet, and refused to accept any correct integration despite many people telling it was not correct

Phyxs is faster than Newton yes, but is that the only thing that count?
Or are you in a bobble that you fell good by making every one else feel worse.
has the decency of being honest.

here is a proper integration
http://newtondynamics.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=8836

Just asking.. or replacing DLLs is enough?

Bounce is a quite mature physics engine, yet simple to integrate and well suited for gamedev.
It would be great if it could be included into Peel to see how it ranks against the fastest (Physx!).

https://github.com/irlanrobson/bounce

68k 4ever :)

really Just asking how much difficult a port would be.. Also indirectly asking how hard is to obtain binaries for other platforms of all peel supported physics engines? For example seems havok via intel offers free win binaries only sdk..

Hi,
Seems physxinfo was offered with physx gpu support in Peel in his testing years ago..
Why it has been removed?