timhutton / gravityisnotaforce Goto Github PK

Hi, I saw you demo and this page and its very clear that there is an interesting observation and a very good lesson. Any physics theory really doesn't make much sense to understand gravity and its best when it is explained without references to other's theories.

Wanted to know how would you define gravity.

Suspect numerical instability in that region - check tolerances?

The curent code for dragging the two handles seems to work on all the pixels in the default scale but breaks if we expand the spacetime_range, because the added factors on vmax and vmin aren't enough. Need to find a better way.

The ribbon should lie flat on the surface (for a suitably thin ribbon) since we are following a geodesic.

When an orbit takes a long time to return to earth, it becomes jagged on the 3D display. Adding more points would help but it gets slow. Can use splines for the tube, to improve things? Or limit the length of the trajectories somehow.

Hello @timhutton ,
GravityIsNotAForce is an experiment by you to find it yourself in best challenging intellectual rules you already know, applied it as a test and found that GravityIsNotAForce. But public opinion and documented papers sees it is a force.

"There is only one truth" - Past century
"There is truth and there is no truth" - Schrodinger's truth

Truth is finding out we were wrong, that's the path to learn a lesson. There is no single truth, but it is not wise to convince or be convinced by someone else's truth. Instead, we can experiment to build something in a computer that will take a form based on the rules or truth that we provide.

An example: Each have their own version of their understanding of universe, best technique to escape the never ending understanding, it would be fun to test who is right on a computer by a world builder. I'm kind of stuck in a loop trying to mix computer science, physics, philosophy together and create something out of it. A system with fact extraction from language and break the facts in the form of force. Then recreate the world using the extracted forces. For example computer programs, instruction set, physicists theories are all symbols that translates to a form of action.

Symbols move something from somewhere to someplace with some force. Keeping energy as infinite source, and adhering to Einstein's truth that "energy can only be converted from one form to another" we can keep creating forms out of this truth.

Just like how magnets or molecules form pairs of compatibility, the pieces inside the world built out of rules/facts/symbols will group together and we can watch it, just observe. While this works, start adding information about the day job (jira, requirement, new topic research) to it and watch it fit itself where it would belong, and perhaps give it keyboard, mouse, other input sources and watch it do my day job :) I chose computer science to build and automate my own job, and I started with UI automation, but at the rate of complex software involved, turns out I'd need to build a better system that will record and replay my actions.

-Vetri

To help make it clearer what happens when one end of the trajectory disappears from the views, show escaping and non-escaping trajectories in different colors.