Slightly confusing error message when using .TIMES() in combination with .IN_SEQUENCE() about trompeloeil HOT 6 CLOSED

This doesn't seem to be that difficult, surprisingly. I'm working a bit with how to format the message. What do you think about this, for your example?

Sequence mismatch for sequence "seq" with matching call of m.func(2) at tst.cpp:32.
Sequence "seq" has m.func(0) at tst.cpp:24 first in line
and has m.func(1) at tst.cpp:28 as first required expectation

from trompeloeil.

If you could try out branch sequence_messaging, it would be much appreciated. I believe it solves your issue.

from trompeloeil.

If you could try out branch sequence_messaging, it would be much appreciated. I believe it solves your issue.

Have tried that branch and can confirm that it solves my issue.

Thank you again.

from trompeloeil.

.TIMES combined with .IN_SEQUENCE is confusing at the best of times. I'll see what I can do to improve the message. Thanks for reporting.

from trompeloeil.

Thank you. This is looking good.

I should have the time to try it out sometime in the next couple of days.

from trompeloeil.

Thanks for checking. I'm leaving this open until a release has been tagged. Probably won't be very long.

from trompeloeil.