``trompeloeil_movable_mock`` only provides move-ctor about trompeloeil HOT 3 OPEN

Is this a question from a philosophical point of view, or do you have a real world use case?

The latter seems to be a mistake (unless it was added as a work-around for some old compiler, I don't remember). I'll remove it (possibly conditionally depending on compiler).

from trompeloeil.

Well, I often stumble across this. I sometimes simply want to setup expectations on a mock and then move it somewhere and do not care, whether it's moved somewhere else or not.
The most annoying fact is, that mock types can not be used as template types, where std::movable (or any depending concept) is required.

from trompeloeil.

OK. Thanks. I'll look into it. I'm somewhat afraid that it'll open a can of worms, but I understand your situation.

from trompeloeil.