psolymos / abmispecies Goto Github PK

The topographic figures are correct, but at first glance a few of them seem wrong because they are mostly green (ie. the dominant colour is green instead of white). Is it possible (and does it make sense) to reverse the scale so that the dominant colour is white for all these figs?

• Genus level taxa to be excluded (EA to handle this in future releases)
• Common names

Double check NN plants page for links.

• reflect recent changes in analyses
• add section about data sources and highlight partnerships

[JS Dec 16 2014]
The bird models were created with Erin’s and BBS data. Presence/absence needs to be shown for the additional sites on the first map for each bird species.

• Incorporate text change suggestions sent by JS.
• add WestGrid/CC acknowledgement to birds, and multi-species pages.
• update species models (2015 field data).

Soil info is presented only for our summary of AGRASID/GVI. I realize that this is the info we use in our analyses, but other soil layers are available and will be valuable to users. Can we present the info and thumb-nails for all of the soil layers

Check lookup tables and turn off N/S summary stat results for common species with good N/S models. E.g. Parmelia sulcata (lichens).

• reflect recent changes in analyses
• add section about data sources and highlight partnerships

[JS Dec 16 2014]
I think the Coefficient of Variation maps are important (they speak to our confidence in the predicted results) but we need to explain these better in the captions. Instead of the 2 maps, can we show a single map describing our confidence in the predicted difference between reference and current conditions. We need to grey-out the mountains because we have no info for this region.

Hey P,
Just a note to remind that the text in the method section need to be revised...
The analysis regions are two , not three.
And we include also climate variables...
http://species.abmi.ca/methods/index.html
Cheers,
/E

Can you put a map of HF at the top of the HF tab that has all of the types combined (a high Q image of this attached). Can you add buttons to download all of the maps in this tab? Also we need a brief description of where the data comes from and how it is portrayed.

• identify leads
• write metadata
• update contents

The grey and red CI bars on the habitat figs are confusing – I think we should only present one CI for each bar.

Bird models included data from the whole province. Show only the info that is relevant to the N, avoid confusion among taxa.

http://sc-dev.abmi.ca/development/pages/habitat/footprint-change.html should be improved.

Can we create a data file to share the 3x7 data on human footprint for each year, and include a down-load button. Also, can we make these figs larger.

• OF birds page to update (provide link in dropdown)
• New sector figures to make
• New sector figures to add to template
• multispp: vase diagrams (sector + intactness) - copy from report?
• Update from E: richness + uniqueness
• Update manual using appendix

[JS Dec 18 2014]
Was there a reason we did not create coarse habitat associations for species detected only a few times (eg for badger)

• FIXME - I didn't compiled the habitat info for mammals to do that.

In the geospatial web pages downloading is mentioned at the top of the page only. Can we have “down load” buttons beside/after each figs like we do with the species pages. Otherwise I think the info about data downloaded will be missed.

[JS Dec 18 2014]
Can we “get rid” of the mammals that don’t belong on the website. I suggest deleting: Grouse Voles Weasels