mikejr83 / marlin-artistd Goto Github PK

I'm trying to print something in duplicate made that takes up the entire plate (the original model takes up half, so the whole thing is taken up with duplicate).

Extruder 1 prints right where expected, but instead of Extruder 2 being offset by half the plate (155 mm), it is offset an additional ~50 mm, so the right side of the duplicate print is off of the plate.

The problem comes down to this: instead of the extruder offset being 155mm (310/2), it is about 200mm, so when Extruder 1 is in the middle of the plate, Extruder 2 is off the plate, instead of along the right edge.

Note: I flashed back to the stock firmware and it is working as expected.

My Configurations

My apologies I don't know how to find these, but this was one of my first prints after flashing the firmware. I basically just updated the tool offset, checked the bed level, and printed.

Steps to Reproduce

1. Slice a file that take up entire left half of printbed (~300x140mm)
2. Set to duplicate mode
3. Print file

Expected behavior: It should print two copies of object, side by side, each taking up half the bed

Actual behavior: The extruder offset is off, causing extruder 2 to print off the edge of the bed when extruder 1 is in the middle.

There is a parallel project going for the Merlin for the Artist-D on Git-hub at:

https://github.com/JGMaker3dofficial/artistd

That is the same thing only different.

The issue for a user like me, is which version to Flash, yours or JGMaker3dofficial's

It would be nice to have a state-n-compare between the two to know what is in both to aid in which to flash...

I am currently on BugFix-2.0.x, which I don't think was a stable release, and it is not seeing the gcode files and there is nothing in
configuration, IDEX, Auto-Park menu.... as soon as I select Auto-Park it re-Homes everything and throws me back to MAIN. I am hoping this is a 2.0.x issue and not something else.

(PS... I am on GitHub for my K40-laser MeerK40T software)

Description

Feature Workflow

1. [First Action]
2. [Second Action]
3. [and so on...]

Additional Information

• Provide pictures or links that demonstrate a similar feature or concept.
• See How Can I Contribute for additional guidelines.

Can you post your source code, not just your compiled bin file. I need to do a file compare to locate the bug i have between our two versions....

Bug Description

Start point of bed leveling not in center

Steps to Reproduce

1. Start level corners in menu

Expected behavior: starts in center point

Actual behavior: starts bottom left

Additional Information

Issue can be corrected with an edit to menu_bed_corners.cpp

• Level corners, starting in the front-left corner.
  */
  static int8_t bed_corner;
  static inline void _lcd_goto_next_corner() {
  constexpr float lfrb[4] = LEVEL_CORNERS_INSET_LFRB;
  constexpr xy_pos_t lf { (X_MIN_BED) + lfrb[0], (Y_MIN_BED) + lfrb[1] },
  rb { (X_MAX_BED) - lfrb[2], (Y_MAX_BED) - lfrb[3] };
  line_to_z(LEVEL_CORNERS_Z_HOP);
  switch (bed_corner) {
  case 0: current_position.set(X_CENTER, Y_CENTER); break;
  case 1: current_position = lf; break; // copy xy
  case 2: current_position.x = rb.x; break;
  case 3: current_position.y = rb.y; break;
  #if ENABLED(LEVEL_CENTER_TOO)
  case 4: current_position.x = lf.x; break;
  #endif