• eslint-config: shared ESLint config
• prettier-config: shared Prettier config
• renovate-config: shared Renovate config
• skip-ci: ✨ Automatically detect [skip ci] messages (and the like) in your last commit 🎉

I have a number of "dev tooling" libraries/packages that I maintain for my own personal use, but having them as N different repositories were getting too onerous to maintain (e.g. you need to update N different packages, and if you wanted to change something that was common across the repos, yup, going into the different repos, making sure they're up to date, making the changes, and then pushing it, N different times).

Thus, I've crammed all of them into a monorepo to hopefully lower the burden of "doing things N times".

Lerna by default will use the top-level .npmrc file for its npm operations. You can override this by putting in a .npmrc in any of the package sub-repos.

All package management/workspaces is delegated to npm. We use useWorkspaces: true to tell lerna to use npm for managing package scopes and the like.

Normally, in a non-monorepo setup, you'd install your dev dependencies (such as your eslint and prettier config, and in my case, skip-ci as well), and have eslint and prettier npm scripts set up to lint your codebase. And then, you'd have git hooks set up at the repo level, running said linters via lint-staged, which would look across all of the staged files and runs eslint/prettier, which read off of the root config. And then in CI, you run the same eslint/prettier commands from the root to see if people fucked around and pressed --no-verify.

However, in a monorepo, it's a bit trickier, because:

1. You'd ideally like to make use of the "run the lint commands only for the files that changed" thing in CI (premature optimization, I know)
2. You might be using different eslint/prettier configs across the various sub-repos.
3. You also need to format (if not lint, depending on your repo setup) the root level, aside from all of the actual sub-repos.

First, let's talk about how to run the lint/format commands in a monorepo setting.

Now, lerna (or, if they've even bothered to update the documentation, NX) itself recommends that you just install and run all this linting shit at the root level (not sure how I feel about their recommendations extending to testing): https://lerna.js.org/docs/faq#root-packagejson.

Thinking about what would be the "ideal" workflow:

• When you change something in a commit, we want that to be covered by the linter/formatter, and only the changed files (lint-staged covers this "for free", making sure we don't have to lint/format files that aren't affected).
• When you run the checks in CI for a PR, you want to be checking the lint/format only for the files that changed in that PR.
• When you run the checks in CI for the master branch (because let's be honest, we all just push to master sometimes), you want to be checking all of the files for lint/format, since we have no idea how many commits have been added to master in between the latest CI run and the previous one.

Thus, in this case, lerna's recommendation certainly checks out - we invoke lint-staged just as before (git hook), and setup CI (depending on the branch) to run the lint command from the root level, on only the files that changed.

Ok, now for how to deal with different configs across the various folders/sub-repos, this part is actually surprisingly easy and doesn't require changes in either our npm scripts at the root, or any of the lint-staged commands to lint/format the staged files.

In particular, eslint will automatically pick up the "nearest" (see https://eslint.org/docs/latest/user-guide/configuring/configuration-files#cascading-and-hierarchy for more info) configuration file, so you can drop in whatever config files you want for any of your sub-repos, and it'll automatically pick up the right config file to apply to the file you want to lint.

As for prettier, well, you really should only have the one at the top, so... yeah.

And, if you want to get even more fancy, you can add separate lint-staged configuration files for each sub-repo, as it, too, does the "look at the closest config file for the file I'm about to touch" thing as eslint. However, in most cases, just the config at the root level should suffice, as eslint and prettier commands don't need to differ across different sub-repos, as seen above.

To control all commit-based workflow for not only the various packages within this repo, but also the repo itself (i.e. the "top-level"), we expect all commits to follow the semantic commit pattern.

The exact config is based on the @janejeon/commitlint-config package (located within the commitlint-config/ folder), and we not only lint commit message before committing them via husky, but also check them in CI.

In particular, in CI, we want to check all commits for a branch to make sure that no "non-semantic" commits get through, which means having to pull down all commits when checkout out on git.

To automatically generate a commit message that adheres to the semantic commit ruleset, you can run npm run commit, which relies on commitzen, which relies on commitlint. The commit generation can be configured via https://commitlint.js.org/#/reference-prompt.

All packages are tracked by lerna using semantic commits. Packages can be versioned and published via lerna.

To version and publish:

1. Make sure you are on the master branch.
2. Run lerna version to version packages according to the semantic versioning rules. This will update package.json versions, create git tags, and update CHANGELOG.md files.
3. Run lerna publish from-git to publish the new versions to npm.
4. Push the git tags with git push --follow-tags.

For now, this is being run manually while I get used to this workflow.