Completion of error handling about msdfgen HOT 5 CLOSED

I suggest focusing on not listening to language lawyers and "code improvement" crusaders on github, whose indirect mission is to waste time in as many open source projects as possible.

On 28 Apr 2016, at 09:04, Markus Elfring [email protected] wrote:

I suggest to avoid ignorance of return values generally.
How do you think about to improve static source code analysis also for this software?

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

from msdfgen.

Is this a quiz? It says that a negative value means an error. Honestly, I'm not really that concerned with flawless error handling in a simple command line utility.

from msdfgen.

Would you find something like this sufficient?

if (fprintf(file, ...) < 0)
    return false;

from msdfgen.

How do you think about to check against an other value (instead of zero) for such a function call?

from msdfgen.

I suggest to avoid ignorance of return values generally.
How do you think about to improve static source code analysis also for this software?

from msdfgen.