Theme: Police and Judicial Reform and Accountability
Brief description of your idea: Every day, in every county across the country, judges are issuing orders finding that police officers have broken the law--that they have lied on duty or on the stand, conducted illegal searches, used excessive force, or violated someone's civil rights in other ways. These orders are referred to as "suppression orders."
Here is the problem: there is currently no organized way to track when an officer is subject to one of these orders. That means prosecutors can continue to charge cases submitted by "bad" cops and tell criminal defense attorneys that they don't know whether the officer has ever been the subject of a suppression order. It also means that officers may be able to testify in court--to a judge or a jury--without anyone knowing that they have previously broken the law while doing their jobs. In fact, it's possible that the officers themselves (and accordingly, their supervisors) don't even know whether a judge has ever found that they have broken the law. Currently, officers fired in one county or state for misconduct can be hired as an officer in another county or state, without the new agency ever being aware that a judge has found the officer lied or engaged in misconduct. (This happens all too frequently.).
There is an easy fix: a nationwide user-generated database that contains information about these suppression orders and allows users to search the database by an officer’s name, jurisdiction, or department. A database that tracks these suppression orders will help identify officers who are repeat offenders, important trends, and precincts that have troubling practices.
What makes your idea unique?:
First:
An attorney who gets a suppression order from a judge would visit the website, fill out a form with information about the officer at issue, and immediately populate a searchable database. When another attorney is preparing a case with an officer, s/he would go to the database and pull up every order issued about that officer. That information goes directly to the officer's credibility when they testifies in court to a judge or jury. It would also allow reporters and community organizers to see which officers in their communities are repeat offenders and should be terminated.
Second:
These orders are a quick and objective way to hold police officers, their departments, and prosecutors accountable. Unlike police complaints, which are private, and the internal investigations done on those complaints, which are private and typically biased, suppression orders are public. They are also objective in that they are a decision from a judge that an officer violated the law. The decision by the judge is usually the final word; not even a police sergeant or police union representative can argue with the finding or rationalize it away.
Third:
The database already exists in a simple format that can be improved dramatically with help.
With the assistance of a few tech-savvy friends, a former public defender and now civil rights attorney in Minneapolis created a website using Wix that hosts a database to track suppression orders and allows user to upload information using a form. The website is https://www.thesuppressionordersproject.org/ and was created in the past two weeks. The attorney is currently reaching out to different public defender officers and criminal defense attorneys around the country to explain its purpose and get people using it. But with only 10 entries currently, the database is already slow. To be effective, the website needs to be better and more user-friendly. Ideally, there could be a username/password requirement, better search capability, and an app or mobile version that would quickly allow users to input or search information.
What would be the impact of your idea if implemented?: The very direct impact of the idea is this: police officers who repeatedly break the law would be fired, and police officers would know they would be held accountable for their actions. As stated above, the database will also help identify important trends and precincts that boast troubling practices.
Skills to contribute (e.g. development, architecture, research, design or anything else): Even though the current version of the website exists on the Wix platform, development, architecture, and design are all skills that would be useful to improving the website and expanding its capacity. Research assistance is also required to compile contact information of the criminal defense groups in all 50 states to spread the word about the database.
Some ideas for improving the website include a document store with an Elasticsearch-driven UI and some basic tools for spam filtering, record verification marking, and user management with three roles (anonymous, user, and admin) and a submission form that's access controlled for logged in users (auth-0 social oAuth would work). Devs and product can play in the query-ui and data science space - chart reports on a map, predict likelihood a new record will be verified as accurate, user saved/share-able queries, etc. Being able to track a report from submission to verification and "appeared in x number of queries run."