vivekjoshy / argus Goto Github PK

Judges are members appointed by parliament who can appoint citizens. They can also overturn a vote in smaller debates. This power diminishes with the size of debates.

Judges can also suggest bans and kicks to the crown.

Two or more Citizens present in a debate will cause a debate to skew significantly the results based on their votes. Two Citizens combined should be worth 10 points on the voting power scale. One Citizen alone will be worth the same as a regular member.

Citizens should also be manually vetted and quizzed on an exhaustive rubric related to debating capacity. They will then be required to use this rubric to vote. These will be optional parameters presented as a modal to the /vote command, that regular members can also fill out.

• Create rubric categories
• Create quiz for citizenship (Use phone verification for this instead if possible)
• Create manual vetting system with /citizenship vet
• Store rubric points in database (based on citizen scores and member scores)
• Display total rubric points for users with /standing commands.

All staff (elected and not), will have an exclusive channel where they can deliberate and pass motions.

There are three kinds of motions:

• Motions about which judges to appoint. (3/4th majority required)
• Motions about general server rules. (Simple majority required) [Auto adds fields to the rules embed].
• Motions about impeachment. (3/4th majority in commons and 1/2 in lords)

There are two chambers:

• Lower chamber (creates bills, and rules)
• Upper chamber (vetoes bills)

Similar to /migrate roles, it will migrate all permissions based on the new specification instead of deleting everything.

This may not be possible unless the following are implemented:

• Check all events are done (ie: event channels are deleted)
• Debate category's channel order is saved manually into a dict and finally reordered based on these values.

• FastAPI
• Vue 3 + Pinia + Naive UI
• Quiz for Citizenship
• Elections Interface