vishandi / pe Goto Github PK

The example is unusable.

VS

This is the initial situation.

At first I thought nothing stated in the UG about duplicate entries, I assumed everything needs to be equal to be considered as duplicates. However, these two inconsistent behaviour occurs:

1. Different address (Accepted)
   

2. Different breed (Not accepted)
   

(Notice the example, who is Woofie?)

(Same thing here)

The feature is supposed to calculate the total charges for a particular pet, not "charge" the pet per se. This could make the user forget about what the feature does.

Hello

As WoofAreYou is expected to be used by pet daycare owner who knows what happened with his/her business on the past, it is logical to assume that they know whether a particular pet is present or absent on a particular day in the past. However, there are 3 states in WoofAreYou: green, red, and unmarked. This could rise some confusion on what was happening on the unmarked day. One suggestion would be to indicate that a pet is absent unless marked green (so the marker will be red or green only).

The second point (highlighted in blue) says that it can only accept one breed, however, the fourth point (highlighted in yellow) says that you can remove all the breeds associated to that pet, which implies a pet can have more than one breeds.

End of manual testing:

This is the initial situation.

As both owner's and pet's name is essentially a name, a user would expect them to have similar behaviour, i.e., if one of them is case-sensitive, the other should too, and vice versa. However, this inconsistency occurs:

VS

If my pet name is "KING WOOOOOOOF WOOOOOOOF WOOOOOOOF OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA", it will be cut in the middle when I use
medium size window.

UG:

DG: