tucotuco / biogeomancer-core Goto Github PK

The lib/ directory contains several unreferenced jar files. Find and remove
them.

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Search for "Missoula"
2. Several possibilities are listed
3. It is difficult to see the map under the overlaying uncertainty errors

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
A checkbox per point/possibility on the left to toggle it's appearance on
the map would make it easier to see the underlaying map.

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.
2.
3.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
Eventually we need to support all input fields supported by the core. The 
most important ones right now, in order or importance, are country, 
stateprovince, county, , verbatimlatitude, verbatimlongitude, island, 
islandgroup, waterbody, continent.

Please use labels and text to provide additional information.

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Open a biogeomancer project
2. It takes a while to see the project

1. Select a record with multiple georeferences
2. Reduce the number of georeferences to 1
3. Go back to the project
4. It takes a while before the "7 georeferences" is changed to "1 georeference"

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
There is no feedback to the user the project is open / the information is
saved. Either these actions should be quicker (no lagging) or there should
be an indication the system is working (spinning wheel,...)

Create tasks for compile, package. 

The build.xml file should have a javadoc task that generates javadocs for
all files in src/ directory. These generated javadocs should be included in
the jar package.

/*
 * Copyright 2007 BioGeomancer Project.
 * 
 * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not
 * use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a
copy of
 * the License at
 * 
 * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
 * 
 * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
 * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT
 * WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the
 * License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations
under
 * the License.
 */

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Search for "Missoula"
2. Several possibilities appear on the map and on the left
3. The 2 first possibilities come from the users database
4. There is no indication of which user created these features

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
An indication of the user for user created features would be useful to
distinct user created features. These would be recorded for logged-in users
only.
An indication of the project/organization/network (e.g. Canadensys) for
user created features would be useful to group users and eventually change
priorities for sources to use for georeferencing (=faster).
Users would have to indicate to what project/organization/network they want
to add their feature, either for every feature they create (cumbersome but
flexible), just once in their user profile or when they create a
biogeomancer project.