The py-make from tqdm

PymakeKeyError: 'No substitution for macros...'when the macros are in commented lines

This error seems to happen when you use a macro in a commented line, and the macro name does not exist.

Commented lines in the makefile should probably be removed before processing ?

pip install issue

I'm trying to get this package installed with pip install py-make.
But it errors out with:

Collecting py-make
  Downloading py_make-0.1.1-py2.py3-none-any.whl (9.4 kB)
Collecting docopt>=0.6.0
  Downloading docopt-0.6.2.tar.gz (25 kB)
  Preparing metadata (setup.py) ... done
Using legacy 'setup.py install' for docopt, since package 'wheel' is not installed.
Installing collected packages: docopt, py-make
  Running setup.py install for docopt ... done
ERROR: Exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "F:\gv\Python310\lib\site-packages\pip\_internal\cli\base_command.py", line 167, in exc_logging_wrapper
    status = run_func(*args)
  File "F:\gv\Python310\lib\site-packages\pip\_internal\cli\req_command.py", line 247, in wrapper
    return func(self, options, args)
  File "F:\gv\Python310\lib\site-packages\pip\_internal\commands\install.py", line 461, in run
    installed = install_given_reqs(
  File "F:\gv\Python310\lib\site-packages\pip\_internal\req\__init__.py", line 73, in install_given_reqs
    requirement.install(
  File "F:\gv\Python310\lib\site-packages\pip\_internal\req\req_install.py", line 814, in install
    success = install_legacy(
  File "F:\gv\Python310\lib\site-packages\pip\_internal\operations\install\legacy.py", line 119, in install
    write_installed_files_from_setuptools_record(record_lines, root, req_description)
  File "F:\gv\Python310\lib\site-packages\pip\_internal\operations\install\legacy.py", line 49, in write_installed_files_from_setuptools_record
    new_lines.append(os.path.relpath(prepend_root(filename), egg_info_dir))
  File "F:\gv\Python310\lib\ntpath.py", line 718, in relpath
    raise ValueError("path is on mount %r, start on mount %r" % (
ValueError: path is on mount 'c:', start on mount 'F:'

Not sure if it's a issue with my Python/pip or the setup.py script of this package.

But, if I do pip3 install --user py-make, it works fine. Producing a %APPDATA%\Python\Python310\Scripts\pymake.exe .
So what's this all about?

I'm on Win-10 with Python 3.10 (x64).

Support basic Makefile syntax

fix py26 unit test
Monkey-patch setuptools or distutils to support python setup.py make
add basic support for substitution macros $(...)
add basic support for complex commands echo hello | world.exe
add basic support for inline dependencies target.o: source.cpp
add basic support for checking timestamps of targets against dependencies
add basic support for wildcards %.o: %.cpp, $^, $<

More readable errors

I tried a simple makefile with an echo command on windows

.PHONY: say_hello
.DEFAULT_GOAL := say_hello

say_hello:
	@echo "hello"

And got this error:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Program Files\JetBrains\PyCharm Community Edition 2018.3.3\helpers\pydev\pydevd.py", line 1758, in <module>
    main()
  File "C:\Program Files\JetBrains\PyCharm Community Edition 2018.3.3\helpers\pydev\pydevd.py", line 1752, in main
    globals = debugger.run(setup['file'], None, None, is_module)
  File "C:\Program Files\JetBrains\PyCharm Community Edition 2018.3.3\helpers\pydev\pydevd.py", line 1147, in run
    pydev_imports.execfile(file, globals, locals)  # execute the script
  File "C:\Program Files\JetBrains\PyCharm Community Edition 2018.3.3\helpers\pydev\_pydev_imps\_pydev_execfile.py", line 18, in execfile
    exec(compile(contents+"\n", file, 'exec'), glob, loc)
  File "C:/_dev/python_ws/_Libs_OpenSource/py-make/examples/simple_examples.py", line 21, in <module>
    main()
  File "C:/_dev/python_ws/_Libs_OpenSource/py-make/examples/simple_examples.py", line 17, in main
    pymake.main()
  File "C:\_dev\python_ws\_Libs_OpenSource\py-make\pymake\_main.py", line 63, in main
    ignore_errors=opts['--ignore-errors'])
  File "C:\_dev\python_ws\_Libs_OpenSource\py-make\pymake\_pymake.py", line 143, in execute_makefile_commands
    check_call(parsed_cmd)
  File "C:\Miniconda3\envs\tools_py37\lib\subprocess.py", line 342, in check_call
    retcode = call(*popenargs, **kwargs)
  File "C:\Miniconda3\envs\tools_py37\lib\subprocess.py", line 323, in call
    with Popen(*popenargs, **kwargs) as p:
  File "C:\Miniconda3\envs\tools_py37\lib\subprocess.py", line 775, in __init__
    restore_signals, start_new_session)
  File "C:\Miniconda3\envs\tools_py37\lib\subprocess.py", line 1178, in _execute_child
    startupinfo)
  File "C:\Program Files\JetBrains\PyCharm Community Edition 2018.3.3\helpers\pydev\_pydev_bundle\pydev_monkey.py", line 513, in new_CreateProcess
    return getattr(_subprocess, original_name)(app_name, patch_arg_str_win(cmd_line), *args)
FileNotFoundError: [WinError 2] Le fichier spécifié est introuvable

It seems that the stacktrace could definitely be improved. I'll propose a PR for this.

Support all of Make CLI arguments

Dependent rules issues

I have encountered two issues with rule dependencies

The first is with comment after a dependency

depa:
	@python -c "print('A')"

all: depa # comment after dependency
	@python -c "print('TEST-PASS')"

The above will fail when running pymake all with

(venv) C:\Dev\idmtools\test_makefile>pymake all
depa # comment after dependency
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Python\Python38\lib\runpy.py", line 194, in _run_module_as_main
    return _run_code(code, main_globals, None,
  File "C:\Python\Python38\lib\runpy.py", line 87, in _run_code
    exec(code, run_globals)
  File "C:\Dev\idmtools\venv\Scripts\pymake.exe\__main__.py", line 7, in <module>
  File "c:\dev\idmtools\venv\lib\site-packages\pymake\_main.py", line 60, in main
    execute_makefile_commands(commands, target,
  File "c:\dev\idmtools\venv\lib\site-packages\pymake\_pymake.py", line 143, in execute_makefile_commands
    check_call(parsed_cmd)
  File "C:\Python\Python38\lib\subprocess.py", line 359, in check_call
    retcode = call(*popenargs, **kwargs)
  File "C:\Python\Python38\lib\subprocess.py", line 340, in call
    with Popen(*popenargs, **kwargs) as p:
  File "C:\Python\Python38\lib\subprocess.py", line 854, in __init__
    self._execute_child(args, executable, preexec_fn, close_fds,
  File "C:\Python\Python38\lib\subprocess.py", line 1307, in _execute_child
    hp, ht, pid, tid = _winapi.CreateProcess(executable, args,
FileNotFoundError: [WinError 2] The system cannot find the file specified

You can observe it is attempting to run the command depa # comment after dependency

The other related issue(I think) it multiple dependencies

depb:
	@python -c "print('A')"

depa:
	@python -c "print('A')"

all: depa depb
	@python -c "print('TEST-PASS')"

which fails with

(venv) C:\Dev\idmtools\test_makefile>pymake all
depa depb
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Python\Python38\lib\runpy.py", line 194, in _run_module_as_main
    return _run_code(code, main_globals, None,
  File "C:\Python\Python38\lib\runpy.py", line 87, in _run_code
    exec(code, run_globals)
  File "C:\Dev\idmtools\venv\Scripts\pymake.exe\__main__.py", line 7, in <module>
  File "c:\dev\idmtools\venv\lib\site-packages\pymake\_main.py", line 60, in main
    execute_makefile_commands(commands, target,
  File "c:\dev\idmtools\venv\lib\site-packages\pymake\_pymake.py", line 143, in execute_makefile_commands
    check_call(parsed_cmd)
  File "C:\Python\Python38\lib\subprocess.py", line 359, in check_call
    retcode = call(*popenargs, **kwargs)
  File "C:\Python\Python38\lib\subprocess.py", line 340, in call
    with Popen(*popenargs, **kwargs) as p:
  File "C:\Python\Python38\lib\subprocess.py", line 854, in __init__
    self._execute_child(args, executable, preexec_fn, close_fds,
  File "C:\Python\Python38\lib\subprocess.py", line 1307, in _execute_child
    hp, ht, pid, tid = _winapi.CreateProcess(executable, args,
FileNotFoundError: [WinError 2] The system cannot find the file specified

I suspect there needs to be some parsing happening on the dependencies portion of rules before execution

Project status and activity / PR review policy

I was glad to find this project :) as we encountered an issue with the make available in conda on windows, where debugging and contributing would be far more complicated (cygwin).

Is it actively maintained ? If so, at which pace would PRs be reviewed and released into PyPi ? (some rough estimation is enough: yearly, monthly, weekly, daily... or never ;) ).

Sorry for asking this in such a straightforward way, but this is just in case we eventually decide to use it in our projects, to decide if I should rather fork it into an independent package, or contribute to it.

Thanks !

Makefiles with source files in different directories

I have Makefiles in several subdirectories but I would like to create a Makefile in the root directory of the project which builds all the Makefiles in my subdirectories. Is this possible and if it is, how so? Thanks !

Command runner, not a build system

Hey, I just stumbled upon this project today. It might be worth mentioning that unlike make this is a command runner using the Makefile syntax. Make's primary purpose is/was to build files from other files, e.g. myprog.o from myprog.c or foo.class from foo.java. The dependencies can be other targets by coincidence, but their primary purpose is looking for files that need rebuilding. This project seems to assume users want to use the PHONY mode for all targets. The README doesn't seem to mention this.

Cheers and keep up the interesting work

Examples of acceptable commands

Hello,
could you share some examples how should I write commands like deleting pycache folder in Makefile that are recognizable by pymake?
I tried with :
rmdir -r __pycache__
and a lot of different variations but it failed.

I am using Window 10, py3.8, pymake v0.1.1

tqdm / py-make Goto Github PK

py-make's Introduction

py-make

py-make's People

Contributors

Stargazers

Watchers

Forkers

py-make's Issues

Recommend Projects

Recommend Topics

Recommend Org