For this assessment, you will be revisiting the cards you made for this assessment. In doing so, will become more proficient at:

• breaking down a monolithic component into smaller, composable components
• writing JSX and interpolating JavaScript values into HTML fragments
• passing props to different components

To get started, fork this repository into your own GitHub account then clone this repository to your local machine:

foo@bar:~ $ git clone [email protected]:github-username/react-cards
foo@bar:~ $ cd react-cards
foo@bar:~/react-cards $

Note github-username above. In other words, don't simply copy-paste the code above blindly into a terminal.

We've removed any boilerplate that was not essential to this project. As such, the two key files in this project are:

• src/index.css: Contains all the CSS ported from the original Flexbox Cards assessment
• src/App.js: Contains the monolithic App component that needs to be broken down. You should only modify this file, but knowing about index.css may help you gain an understanding of how things are wired together.

Next, install dependencies using yarn. You should now be able to run yarn start from a terminal and see the familiar cards appear in your browser:

Note: Please see the rubric on Canvas for detailed breeak down on how this assessment is being graded. The information below is provided for your convenience.

We've already written a CardGroup component for you. You might however, have noticed that we aren't using it anywhere. That is your first task. Take a look at the implementation for CardGroup and create an instance of it inside of App, replacing the necessary HTML as you do.

Hint: Take a look at class names.

We've stubbed out a dummy implementation for the Card component. replace the div with a proper implementation. That implementation should take the following props:

• description: A string which is the text to appear in the .card__descriptionText div. Example: "Trial".
• hint: An optional string which is the text to appear in parentheses after a description. Example: "most popular"
• icon: A string which is the font-awesome class to use for the .card__descriptionIcon div. Example: "fa-trophy".
• price: A string which is the price to be listed on the card. Example: "$6,000.00"

Hint: Conditionally rendering will be covered in detail later, but here's an example of conditionally showing text if it's provided:

const Hello = props => (
    <div>
        <h1>Hello, there!</h1>
        {props.message && <p>{props.message}</p>}
    </div>
);

const App = () => (
    <div>
        <Hello />
        <Hello message="Pleased to meet you!" />
    </div>
);

The above would result in the following HTML:

    <div>
        <div>
            <h1>Hello, there!</h1>
        </div>
        <div>
            <h1>Hello, there!</h1>
            <p>Pleased to meet you!</p>
        </div>
    </div>

Here's a runnable version if you'd like to play around with it.

The line with && in it basically reads as: "If there's a message, render a paragraph with that message". You can use the same trick to conditionally render a break tag and a hint after it if a hint is provided.

You should now be able to replace all of the cards inside the CardGroup component that you used in step 1 inside of app. When it's all said and done, you should see 1 instance of the CardGroup component and 3 instances of the Card component. There should be no elements with className left inside of the App component. In other words, all those divs with classNames in them should be encapsulated inside of the Card and CardGroup components.

Here are a few hints to help you along the way.

You'll notice that we've changed the import line from this:

import React, { Component } from "react";

To this:

import React from "react";

We will eventually explain how ES6 import syntax works, but the short version for now is that we aren't using Component anywhere, so there is no need to import it. We also prefer to use the shorter version when using classes, as the expanded version is technically more typing and leads to confusion. That is, instead of class App extends Component, we prefer class App extends React.Component.

As you look at src/App.js, you'll notice that not a single class is defined. The reason for this is that none of the components take state. As such, a component that looks like this:

class Text extends React.Component {
    render() {
        return (
            <h1>Hello, <span style={{ color: this.props.color }}{this.props.value}</span></h1>
        );
    }
}

Can be rewritten as:

const SomeComponent = props => (
    <h1>Hello, <span style={{ color: props.color }}{props.value}</span></h1>
);

By utilizing ES6 destructuring assignment we can reduce that further, still:

const SomeComponent = { props, color } => (
    <h1>Hello, <span style={{ color }}{ value }</span></h1>
);

You may have also noticed that some tags are self closing. Something like this:

<div className="icon fa fa-bolt card__descriptionIcon" />

The reason for this is that if you have an element that doesn't have children (such as this empty div), then you should prefer to instead write it as a self-closing tag when writing JSX.

Because JSX is technically JavaScript, all reserved words are off-limits for use as props. As such, class has been renamed className. Another common one that you may see in the future is htmlFor, which replaces a label's for attribute. See Differences In Attributes for a more exhaustive list of differences.

Pay attention to the terminal after running yarn start. It'll display errors and warnings with your code, which is a convenient way to get feedback without having to switch to a browser first.

If you find yourself with extra time (e.g., don't have other assessments to catch up on), you may consider improving the quality in a number of ways:

• The Card component can be broken down into further components that use props.children like CardGroup does. Experiment with doing so.
• Now that they are broken down, compare/contrast benefits of having done so. Does using smaller components lead to more boilerplate when using the comopnents? Are there any benefits to taking children over regular props?
• At the moment, the three cards are hard-coded. See if you can work out how to take an array of objects consisting of a description, icon, and price, and generate Card components dynamically from them. Hint. Array.prototype.map will be your friend here.

This morning, you learned how to deploy a React app to GitHub Pages, so you will be required to submit a deployed application today. If you instead submit a link to a GitHub repository (that is, only code), you will be awarded 0 points.