tilde-lab / awesome-materials-informatics Goto Github PK
View Code? Open in Web Editor NEWCurated list of known efforts in materials informatics, i.e. in modern materials science
Curated list of known efforts in materials informatics, i.e. in modern materials science
Is the ICSD excluded from the list for a reason? http://www2.fiz-karlsruhe.de/icsd_home.html
This goes back to the request in #2 to add a file including the databases that have been explicitly excluded because they don't meet the criterion of machine-readability.
Just came across this interesting and rather extensive list:
http://miccom-center.org/centers.html
Might be worth a link?
One could argue that "machine readable materials databases" are their core business.
http://www.grantadesign.com/products/data/index.htm
Still, the focus is engineering rather than science, and the databases seem to differ from most of the ones listed here as many of them don't seem to go into atomic resolution of the material.
Should those be listed here as well?
If not, how to amend the criteria in order to exclude them?
In my opinion, the two categories "software frameworks" and "materials databases" are well-chosen, but I wonder whether we need a third category.
I'm thinking of sites like nanohub, but also others like ZEOMICS / MOFomics, where the main benefit is not so much the database, but rather the fact that a user can upload his or her own structure (or set up a calculation in another way) and get a result back.
Unfortunately, I haven't found a very precise name for this category... my ideas so far:
Since you are restricting the list to machine-readable datasets (and rightfully so, I would say), it would be very helpful to explain what this means, perhaps best using a few examples.
In practical terms: Many of these materials science efforts provide a HTML form, which connects to a database and spits out another HTML page with search results (possibly paginated). Should this count as machine readable?
In principle, of course, all information made available in digital form can be considered machine readable, but then we can drop the requirement in the first place.
In my view:
What did you have in mind?
In the end, perhaps it is best to drop the requirement and rather put something like a FAIR sticker (or similar) to those entries that actually make it easy to query the data automatically.
very interesting reference from 2010 with an overview of existing materials databases
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1070/RC2010v079n02ABEH004104/meta
we should check whether we are missing any
(I don't no much about the project yet, if I have a chance to delve deeper I can submit a PR)
Hello,
I have been maintaining lists of common functional groups for different diverse communities. For materials the lists I have are:
Common Functional groups for Clay Adsorption: https://github.com/Sulstice/global-chem/blob/master/global_chem/global_chem/materials/clay/montmorillonite_adsorption.py
And Common Monomers:
https://github.com/Sulstice/global-chem/blob/master/global_chem/global_chem/materials/polymers/common_monomer_repeating_units.py
I
Are either of these acceptable to add to your awesome list?
Thank you.
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
๐ Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
A PHP framework for web artisans
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐๐๐
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
Data-Driven Documents codes.
China tencent open source team.