A good idea would be to include contibutors of the code on the page, like github does. Example:

Description of the feature request

The scroll-bar could be customized for a better overall look of the website.

Add screenshots of the feature request (if applicable)

No response

Additional information/context

No response

Description of the bug

As mentioned in issue #142 (still open so I am contributing). The java sorting GitHub page doesn't open for any sorting algorithm.

Add screenshots of the bug (if applicable)

So the problem is this

1. Code Implementation Links of java sorting link directs to this URL (I am using a bubble sort link for example)(https://github.com/TheAlgorithms/Java/blob/master/Sorts/BubbleSort.java)
2. The problem with this link is - it was supposed to be this (https://github.com/TheAlgorithms/Java/blob/master/src/main/java/com/thealgorithms/sorts/BubbleSort.java)

The lib file is correct

with java baseDir being (baseDir: "src/main/java/com/thealgorithms",)

I think the problem comes from the Java repo itself because 👇

• If I see any other Code Implementation Links (example - Scala (https://github.com/TheAlgorithms/Scala/blob/master/src/main/scala/Sort/BubbleSort.scala) )
  it works. it has the same baseDir thing as implemented in java - (based: "src/main/scala",)

Now try to compare both of the like (provided by web and repo link)-

web one -

repo one -

So the only difference it comes down to is this

In the java repo of the sort folder notice how it is written in small letters

as compared to other language repo of the sort folder (again taking the example of scala)

So I think when it searches for java sort folder repo it did not find it because of a short letter that is - (s) in sort folder of java and it gives us an error or 404.

So maybe changing the java sort repo folder name from sort to Sort might work (i didn't read the whole codebase) because maybe it uses children prop.

PS I think for the test we can do that it's not going to affect the website in any way.

Additional information/context

No response

On mobile, the website is quite slow, and sometimes it just fails and you need to refresh the page.
That happens only on mobile, though. On my PC it works a bit slow but it's acceptable.

Any reasons why that happens?
Thanks.

Description of the content report

Like the previous issue I made, I found 2 more Algorithms being the exact same. This time they were about Ugly Numbers (Java implementation & Python+Dart implementation) and Fermat's Little Theorem (Dart implementation & Python Implementation)

Add screenshots of the content report (optional)

No response

Add any other context about the report here

No response

Description of the bug

Bug: Responsiveness of the website
Device: Galaxy Fold
Dimensions: 280 x 653

Add screenshots of the bug (optional)

Add any other context about the problem here

No response

Can you explain what this regex expression is supposed to do? This is returning null value for every file due to which code inside the "if" block is not getting executed.

const match = dir.match(/(?:.+)\/(.+)\.md/);

Description of the feature request

Hi. I'm Shisato Yano from Japan.
I found this project and it looks so great!!

I'd like to suggest to add function translating all sentences into Japanese on your website. I think that a lot of Japanese programmers are interested in this project and it's very useful for them to translate into Japanese.

If above my suggestion is also valuable for you guys, I will try contributing to this project by translating by myself. Is it OK?

Add screenshots of the feature request (if applicable)

No response

Additional information/context

No response

Description of the content report

There's 2 entries for Aliquot Sum C# and Python+Ruby+Java

Add screenshots of the content report (optional)

No response

Add any other context about the report here

No response

It must be replaced by dart icon.

Hey
I am new to this repository and just started to set it up on my local machine. I have already installed all the dependencies and fetched all the algorithms, but by booting the server, an error has resulted that the Fibonacci-numbers file is not found.

I couldn't find a connection to a communication channel, so I opened the issue.
It would be nice if anyone can help me resolve this.

TheAlgorithms/C-Sharp#205

Remove directory workflow because it includes what it shouldn't (AssemblyInfo, interfaces, tests, etc.) and titles are ugly

The workflow should be reworked. I don't really know how those files work, so I would appreciate it, if you would do that @Panquesito7

Codes in languages like Python, Javascript, Dart, Go etc are displayed in proper highlited format but C++ implementations are in black and white mode meaning no code highlighting is there.

Python

C++

Description of the bug

The Plausible Analytics page is not working and displaying an error.
This issue has been for a long time by now. I thought it was fixed. 😅

Let me know if you need any help in fixing this. :)

Add screenshots of the bug (if applicable)

Additional information/context

No response

Description of the bug

error occured when run gradient descent algorithm python code on Code Playground

PythonError: Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/lib/python3.9/site-packages/_pyodide/_base.py", line 415, in eval_code
    CodeRunner(
  File "/lib/python3.9/site-packages/_pyodide/_base.py", line 296, in run
    coroutine = eval(self.code, globals, locals)
  File "", line 5, in 
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'numpy'

Add screenshots of the bug (optional)

Add any other context about the problem here

No response

If we search and choose any algorithm the default preview code is of python, if we click on the language icons provided below the code we will be redirect to the specific repository. Wouldn't it be nice if instead of redirecting to the repository just show the code in choosed language in the same way as it was for Python.

What would you like to share?

We now have a link to our Discord server using our domain, which is much easier to remember and share.
All discord.gg instances should be replaced with https://the-algorithms.com/discord/.

Additional information/context

This is a good first issue. Please leave it open to beginners or first-time contributors. 🙂

It would be cool if there'd be an option to make the website be in dark mode.
For example, I use Dark Reader, and it looks pretty cool in Dark Mode:

It would be nice if we could add a donation button somewhere on the page. People will be able to find it easier now. 🙂

We can also add a widget of how much money the organization is receiving per week:

What do you think?

There still are a few of errors in the data fetched from the repositories that need to be fixed.

• tests get picked up
• Categories strings and string are almost the same
• The category src exists somehow
• These are all the same: sorting sorts sorters sort
• These are also all the same: searching searches search
• Haskell specs get picked up
• others other misc are the same
• math and maths are the same
• hashing, hashes and hash are the same
• graph and graphs are the same
• divideconquer and divideandconquer are the same
• algorithmstests shouldn't exist
• algorithms shouldn't be a category, instead the next tags of the algorithm

Some of them need to be fixed in the workflow that creates the DIRECTORY.md file directly in the seperate repositories, some can be fixed by expanding the aliases to also include categories.

Idea is to add a code playground section in code view frame. Once user clicks on Play button, user should be able to modify a virtual instance of current code and should be able to play around with that code by running the modified code on the very same page. This will create a beautiful learning experince.

• C (High Priority)
• C++ (High Priority)
• Java (High Priority)
• Python (High Priority)
• Javascript (High Priority)
• Rust (Medium Priority)
• Golang (Medium Priority)
• MATLAB (Low Priority)
• Ruby (Low Priority)
• C# (High Priority)
• Swift (Medium Priority)
• Jupyter (Medium Priority)
• Julia (Low Priority)
• Kotlin (High Priority)
• R (Medium Priority)
• OCaml (Low Priority)
• Elm (Low Priority)
• Dart (Medium Priority)
• Haskell (Medium Priority)
• Elixir (Low Priority)
• Clojure (Low Priority)
• F# (Low Priority)
• Scala (Low Priority)
• PHP (Low Priority)
• AArch-64 Assembly (Low Priority)

If there is a Jupyter notebook available for an algorithm, use this library to show it as an explanation for an algorithm.

For performance reasons, the render should be done at build time.

@appgurueu:

please replace the background image of the site. It features (ugh!) frontend/backend webapp BS code, not algorithm code.

Title for All algorithms on https://the-algorithms.com/hr/all does not translate. The title seems to be hard coded, because other languages have the same problem.

I'm not a programmer, but I think something needs to be changed in the file website/pages/all.tsx, so the translated string in Weblate gets used, just as it does in the website's footer (please see attached screenshots).

Description of the feature request

Now that our network is growing, I think we should add a community partners page.

Add screenshots of the feature request (if applicable)

No response

Additional information/context

These are our current community partners (as of now):

• Humans of Julia.
• DiscoRd for everything R.
• World of Coding.
• Dev Protocol.

I would like to work on CSS part of box so that to make more UI interactive . Kindly assign me this issue and I will work on this .

https://the-algorithms.com/language/aarch64-assembly. Click on the GitHub repo button.

Description of the bug

Contributors are wrong, see https://the-algorithms.com/de/algorithm/linked-stack - it shows only a Lua implementation, yet 4 contributors are shown which haven't contributed to the Lua repo at all.

chetan:

Yes, let's add it. This way atleast we could know how many people are using the website also what all features are most used and focus on them.

I wouldn't use google analytics, but something simpler like plausible which could also be self-hosted.

Description of the feature request

There are a ton of algorithms present on https://the-algorithms.com, but I feel that they aren't presented as well. Don't get me wrong, the site is well made, however I think adding difficulty levels to the algorithms and showing the number of people that have viewed it would add 2 new filters for people to search with and find good algorithms and make it easier to categorize.
I know this site is just for educational purposes only and mostly meant to be used as a tool to find the solution which you need for your problems, however I think that it could also be extended to cater to the people who just want to browse through some algorithms in general, and maybe learn something new. People would be able to compare themselves and their knowledge to others, and improve as a whole, learning from each other. At the present, the site's elegant and highly functional, but it cannot cater to those groups of people as well. Because when you go to, let's say, problems under Math category, I don't exactly find anything new to learn from there (because I only see the names most of the time), neither do I know the level of the stuff in there. Some problems, like Fibonacci ones, are comparatively easy to stuff like Riemann Integration, etc.

The reason I'm also advocating for the addition of views is that, it could also allow people to know about popular topics, which are important to know for everyone. Like some stuff isn't always used by everyone, and can be very niche. Not everyone should be spending their time ignoring other well known topics which are useful to them and spending time to those niche algorithms. So it would help people to basically improve their strengths, rather than being jack of all trades. However I believe views may not be a good factor all the time, since the niche algorithms might get overshadowed. But that's up for debate.

Add screenshots of the feature request (optional)

No response

Add any other context about the feature request here

No response

Right now every page has to load about 1MB of icons, which increases the first load time by a lot. @Panquesito7 is already working on a fix.

I was looking around the website, found that in mobile view the logo of the website comes over the sidebar and it looks kind of weird whereas on the other page it works fine.

Adding a few Screenshot for the refernce :)

Homepage :

Other pages:

Many domains deployed with Vercel are not being redirected.
For example, see daed0a8#commitcomment-47549040 and go to one of the links (except for the 3rd and the 4th).

What would you like to share?

@Panquesito7 the whole issue templates seem a bit unnecessary to me. All of the fields except What would you like to share? are kinda useless.

Can we just revert to how the issue templates worked before where they just added tags to the issue?

Additional information

No response

Uneven sized algorithm box components on algorithm category pages
e.g. https://the-algorithms.com/category/dynamicprogramming,
https://the-algorithms.com/category/sorts

Description of the bug

I was just looking for something I could contribute when I found that there is a problem on converting degrees to radians on the website, implemented in Python (can be seen here)
Later when I tried looking for it (to put an implementation in JavaScript) but then I found this, the exact same problem but only implemented in JavaScript, under a slightly different name.

I am not sure how many of such duplicate problems can be found, but I would request:

1. Checking of problems, so that they are confirmed to be non duplicate
2. Merge these 2 problems into a single one (like that needs to be done, since that's what the website is for, providing easy access to algorithms fast and efficiently)

Add screenshots of the bug (optional)

No response

Add any other context about the problem here

No response

Description of the bug

It appears all the Vercel tests are failing, which prevents the website from being updated and deployed.

Add screenshots of the bug (if applicable)

No response

Additional information/context

No response

Description of the bug

Algorithms from the Lua repo are missing. See the simplist radical form algorithm for an example.

In the repositories section, I don't see all algorithm-repositories there.
For example, the MATLAB-Octave repository is missing from the list.

The current code preview is pretty clunky on mobile, a solution to that could be a second one specifically for mobile.

The current one one mobile:

@Panquesito7 what do you think of the current code view on mobile, is it okay as it is right now or should it be replaced?

Description

There are two buttons on the top right of iframe View on Github and another is Close. Both buttons are disimilar in UI perspective. would not it be nice if we make them a look a bit similar such as that border around Close button is not matching with another button.

Description of the bug

Description
Code implementation links of algorithms when opened are giving 404 errors. I observed such behavior for Bubble sort.

Actual behavior

1. Go to https://the-algorithms.com/algorithm/bubble-sort
2. Scroll down to Code Implementation links
3. Click on Java

Actual behavior
4. See Github 404 page (the link is https://github.com/TheAlgorithms/Java/blob/master/Sorts/BubbleSort.java)

Expected behavior
4. Bubble sort page should open (the link is https://github.com/TheAlgorithms/Java/blob/master/src/main/java/com/thealgorithms/sorts/BubbleSort.java)

Add screenshots of the bug (if applicable)

No response

Additional information/context

Originally reported here TheAlgorithms/Java#2840

Description of the feature request

The Lua repo has tests and algorithm implementations neatly separated. It would be nice if there was a way to show (& probably run) the tests.

It would be much easier to read and understand the stars count in the programming languages list. At least for me, it's quite hard to read them, especially if they're over 10k. It's just an idea; it doesn't have to be implemented. 🙂

Thank you.

Description of the content report

Python Implementation & Go Implementation

Add screenshots of the content report (optional)

No response

Add any other context about the report here

No response

It is probably a good idea to bring all the folders in the different repositories to a common standard.

From @ayaankhan98 #60 (comment)

Yes, i think there must be a common standard for all the repositories.
Basically i think there is no need to maintain project type structure in such repositories, because each algorithm is independent of other and also each data structure is independent of other. It would be nice if we sum up one single algorithm in a single file (Implementation + Documentation + Tests). And arrange these files according to their categories. Most of the traffic of these repositories are among those peoples who are completely new to opensource or i would say who are new to computer programming (College undergraduates), our aim is to simplify the learning process by bringing all the generall data structures and algorithims under a single roof of The Algorithms. So, instead of creating a complex project strucutres i think it is better to keep things simple. we are not building any library or framework for algorithms, rather we are just simplifying the learning process.

There are already a lot of repositories with the same or almost the same folder structure (python, C++, C, ...), so we are probably going with a folder structure like in the python repo.

That means, every algorithm is in a single file (including inline documentation and tests) and every repo has the same top level folders (for example divide_and_conquer).

All repositories have an image, but there are some repositories
that are missing an image, such as the MATLAB-Octave repository.

Description of the content report

https://the-algorithms.com/algorithm/singly-linked-list on this page the JS solution isn’t available but it’s implemented here https://github.com/TheAlgorithms/Javascript/blob/961f21f97c1ae53d79f90ee82a968d9a0409b968/Data-Structures/Linked-List/SinglyLinkList.js

Add screenshots of the content report (if applicable)

No response

Additional information/context

Meta, I think the description of the content report field should be a text box, because a having a single line for long text makes it hard to scan and modify.

The #98 PR introduces a bug in dark mode.

Category tags don't translate on website, even though the categories are translated at Weblate! Please see attached screenshots.

Also, some categories are not defined at Weblate, for instance:

• Machine Learning
• Neural Network
• maybe others?