Git Product home page Git Product logo

alp-fail's Introduction

Oh hey, my name is Terence. ๐Ÿ‘‹

I'm a software engineer based in Melbourne, Australia. I am currently work at Atlassian, but you might also know me from TechGeek, what I do at UNIHACK Melbourne and/or as an organiser at JuniorDev Melbourne.

whoami โ€ข Blog โ€ข Twitter โ€ข LinkedIn โ€ข Instagram โ€ข Buy Me A Coffee


My preferred way of communicating is through Twitter. Alternatively, you can find my email details on my website.

I guess this page will get updated at some point...

alp-fail's People

Contributors

achurchassoc avatar auscompgeek avatar cailyoung avatar djmyles avatar hammygoonan avatar hugomd avatar ineffyble avatar j0nathontayl0r avatar jimmyaustin avatar joshdholmes avatar justrhysism avatar knightrider0xd avatar kochie avatar mebinum avatar molarfox avatar nadock avatar nathanmalishev avatar patmurraydev avatar pkumaschow avatar r1chardj0n3s avatar rafaelgonzalez avatar renlord avatar robotnikryan avatar sevenseacat avatar shayneoneill avatar spidie avatar tasssinclair avatar terencehuynh avatar tomsesselmann avatar tserong avatar

Stargazers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

Watchers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

alp-fail's Issues

alp.fail is too secure

Going to http redirects to httpS. Shouldn't this be the other way around to make a point :)

... just making a joke - probably don't want to change this.

... maybe :)

Allow general public to add names of support

Request:

I think a simple form at the bottom of the page that would allow the general public who do not have github accounts to add their names of support to this letter would make the impact of this site even more powerful.

Maybe OAuth could be used to ensure a bit more credibility for each signee.

Proposal: More in-depth explanation of concerns

I think that we should give a more detailed list of concerns with the bill. Currently the concerns are quite scatter-brain, ranging from political concerns to practical ones (with the evidence being things like stock prices or twitter threads). And most importantly, there isn't a list of primary concerns (which might have an impact).

If you like, I can write up a draft which contains most of the primary concerns (I've read through the whole bill several times and think that I can put most of the issues into words). Quite a lot of the more extreme worrying is coming from people who haven't read the entire bill, and for instance incorrectly claim that you can go to gaol for non-compliance with a TCN. We should provide some preliminary information about what the bill says for the tl;dr crowd.

I'm currently (as I'm sure most people are) contacting lawyers to ask for their understanding of the changes and what practical differences are there (given common law precedent) which us lay-people might be missing.

(Personally I think we should also petition government for an Australian Bill of Rights to be enshrined in the Constitution, but that's something we'll need to work on separately and will likely take many years to get close to doing. There was a research paper in 1999 discussing this problem, but obviously we're no closer than we were before.)

Suggestion: Banners to be embedded externally

It would be great to have some form of banner, corner piece or modal that we could embed into our own web projects, blogs, etc. to promote alp.fail to other techies or even for the general public :)

Argue better

I'm not an Australian citizen, and so don't have a dog in the fight, but was made aware of the site by a colleague.

I read the first paragraph and I'm already inclined to disagree with you. From what I understand, the bill is a bad thing for sure, but the opening paragraph leans on:

  • Feelings;
  • "Won't somebody please think of the children";
  • And ad hominem.

It all seems very childish.

Remove reference to stock prices

The problem with basing an argument on stock prices is the price could be moving for other reasons. There has been in the last few weeks a general downturn in the stock market and in particular tech stocks. Also if the price rebounds and reaches a new high then that makes the argument invalid.

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    ๐Ÿ–– Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ“ˆ๐ŸŽ‰

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.