Git Product home page Git Product logo

source's People

Contributors

ancorgs avatar andrii-suse avatar aplanas avatar bashofmann avatar dcermak avatar ddemaio avatar dirkmueller avatar ebauman avatar gionaufal avatar janzerebecki avatar jfehlig avatar m0ses avatar mattfarina avatar mook-as avatar mvarlese avatar nicstange avatar niusmallnan avatar okurz avatar oskapt avatar paususe avatar rjschwei avatar rohitsakala avatar rumch-se avatar stefanotorresi avatar sysrich avatar vestival avatar vmoutoussamy avatar vogtinator avatar votdev avatar

Stargazers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

Watchers

 avatar  avatar  avatar

source's Issues

Oredering by project by score / size / number of contributions

Hello team,

Leap or generally openSUSE (Including Tumbleweed) is one of the largest aggregator of opensource work and the largest opensource projects SUSE has. Yet it didn't make it to the top. What about to put on some score based ordering?

I do not want to be the person to put it into the first row. But contribution wise, it would be the case.
Comming up with some score based ordering could help.

Otherwise I'm happy that its visible without scrolling at least on my computer.

my 2 cents.

Unclear rules for "open source software that SUSE has created"

I am wondering if for example we should add projects from https://github.com/os-autoinst/ to this page, e.g. https://github.com/os-autoinst/openQA/ . One reason for hestitation is that I am not sure if we should say that "SUSE has created" openQA. Likely it was mainly if not 100% SUSE colleagues which at that time were IIRC members of a "openSUSE team" so it could be that the creation of the project was actually done by "openSUSE" as an entity, not SUSE. Also, despite the main contributions done by SUSE colleagues there are many contributions by non-SUSE members. I hope this can be clarified in this project here and maybe a disclaimer along the lines of "Listing a project by no means tries to diminuish any contribution regardless if project members are colleagues of SUSE or not". I am sure there can be better phrasing :)

Labels

Categories are a good start but sometimes projects fall into several categories and it's not really clear where to place them. Labels (multiple labels allowed) could help with that.

Labels could help also to say, e. g. there is a commercial offering, or that we are hiring, or that we have open community hours.

E. g. Uyuni does infrastructure, provisioning, operations (systems management), virtualization, monitoring, SecOps, has a paid-for supported option (SUSE Manager), etc:

labels: infrastructure, operations, virtualization, monitoring, security, commercial, hiring, community-hours

Value upstream first over creating new projects

#17 was rejected with:

We intentionally want to limit this to projects that SUSE created. Otherwise it will become a list of hundreds of projects where SUSE made any commit, and that changes the value of the page.

Indeed this does change values. Before we valued upstream first ( see https://opensource.suse.com/suse-open-source-policy ) over creation of new projects for the sake of distinct projects. There are situations were it is useful to create new projects even when existing projects could be made to fit. But this goes one step further and generally valuing it more, without inspecting the case. Can you explain what benefit new projects / distinct projects have that makes them more valuable than upstream first?

Add carousel

Six featured projects, featured statically, seems a bit short. What about adding a carousel to be able to display more featured projects?

Please note I am not saying all projects should be featured but that the subset of featured projects is probably going to be more than 6.

I. e.
Total suse-projects = N
Total featured projects = M (where N > M)
Total displayed featured projects = 6 (where M > 6, hence there's a case for a carousel)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    ๐Ÿ–– Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ“ˆ๐ŸŽ‰

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.