May I ask a theoretical question about dmpbbo HOT 3 CLOSED

Hello, your code is very excellent.

Thanks for the feedback!

I don't understand all your questions in detail:

• DMPs where designed such that they converge to the goal, independent of the values of θ in the function approximators for the forcing term.
• You can change the goal, even during the movement, and then the DMP will then converge to that goal (without any RL).
• One can optimize the goal location for a specific task instantiation. If you then change the goal for that task, the DMP will still converge ot the goal, but it is not ensured that it will solve the task instantiation (or with higher cost).

Without noise exploration, I use the original DMP to directly modify the target point,
and it seems that the resulting trajectory can also pass through the target point.

Yes, because convergence to the goal is an inherent property of DMPs, not of optimizing its parameters.

Including in the papers in recent years, I have seen some people say that they need to use the method of reinforcement learning θ and target point g. Otherwise, if you change the target location only using DMP, you will not be able to reach the target point. I don't really understand the role of Reinforcement Learning here.

Me neither ;-) Which papers are you referring to?

If I do not control the speed, acceleration and other information to reach the target point, although theoretically DMP will reach the target point, due to the large acceleration and speed, it may not accurately stop at the point we want, or even damage the equipment. Is there a problem with my understanding?

That is correct. The DMP will theoretically converge to the target g. But if you pass accelerations of 10000 rad/s² to your robot joints on the way to g, it will explode before reaching it... That is why the license for dmpbbo includes a "no warranty" statement. It's up to the user to make sure that this does not happen.

from dmpbbo.

Thank you for your reply, which answered many of my questions.

Regarding the paper, for example， in "D. Reinforcement Learning With Optimal Target" in paper "DMP-Based Motion Generation for a Walking Exoskeleton Robot Using Reinforcement Learning", the author mentions, "However, constraints between joints can cause positional disturbances of the goal; so, we need to learn the goal exploration by the DMP parameter optimization."

In "Reinforcement Learning of Dual-Arm Cooperation for a Mobile Manipulator with Sequences of Dynamical Movement Primitives" mentions,"However, the uncertain external perturbations, errors of the feedback information, and little knowledge about the environment might cause the motion sequences deviated from the desired trajectories." / "In the learning process, the recorded joint trajectories on the first trial is used to initialize the DMPs, and then reinforcement learning (RL) improvement with Path Integrals (PI2) is used to learn the manipulation uncertainty information by interacting with environment and to adjust the DMPs base on the information."

For another example, in the fifth part of the paper "Reinforcement Learning of Manipulation and Grasping Using Dynamical Movement Primitives for a Humanoidlike Mobile Manipulator", it is mentioned that "However, that planning might not be successful in practice due to uncertainty perturbations, even if theoretical grasps and motion planning are successful. Nevertheless, the DMPs can be employed to generate goal directed movements with generalization and learning either in joint or task space due to its capability of being robust to those perturbations."

At present, I have only experimented in the simulation environment. I record the motion track of the end effector, and input the recorded track to the manipulator in the simulation environment again. Eventually, I can move smoothly to the target point, but the middle track is slightly different. If the deviation of the intermediate trajectory is interpreted as the uncertainty disturbance of the manipulator mentioned by the author, I still don't understand why the target position g is also disturbed.

In my opinion, DMP can accurately reach the target point, so it is not the DMP algorithm that is affected by the disturbance, but the planned trajectory that cannot be correctly executed due to the disturbance of the manipulator itself. Why does the paper say that DMP algorithm is robust to these disturbances? I think it's my own understanding that has gone wrong.

Sorry for taking up your time, and thank you very much.

from dmpbbo.

It would help if you included links to those papers. Ideally to freely accesible PDFs.

At present, I have only experimented in the simulation environment. I record the motion track of the end effector, and input the recorded track to the manipulator in the simulation environment again. Eventually, I can move smoothly to the target point, but the middle track is slightly different. If the deviation of the intermediate trajectory is interpreted as the uncertainty disturbance of the manipulator mentioned by the author, I still don't understand why the target position g is also disturbed.

The dynamical system guarantees convergence to g when when t approaches infinity. Luckily you don't always have to wait that long ;-) If the value of tau for the trained dmp is for instance 2 seconds, try and integrate the system longer (e.g. 3 seconds). By that time, the output of the DMP should have converged to g. Otherwise there is an issue with the code somewhere.

from dmpbbo.