ssahara / dw-plugin-commentsyntax Goto Github PK

This code

Paragraph 1

/* Comment */
Paragraph 2

renders as

Paragraph 1 Paragraph 2

instead of

Paragraph 1

Paragraph 2

Please remove "<" and ">" to make mailto link created by shortcode ~~INFO:syntaxplugins (as used on wiki:syntax page) valid, currently the link is <[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])>, see PR #11

xbrプラグインとこのプラグインを同時に適用すると、改行が余計に挿入される事があります。

こちらのページでは、ページ冒頭にコメントのみの行を挿入しているのですが、どうやら、コメントを閉じた後の改行が無視されず出力されているようです（コメントのみの行については、行ごと無視される〈改行も出力しない〉のが望ましい）。
もしお手間でなければ対応頂けますでしょうか。よろしくお願いします。
（本当は「こうしたら上手く行きますよ」ってプルリクエストを送信したかったけど、手元では上手く行かなかったのでこの形でご勘弁下さい）

The plugin https://www.dokuwiki.org/plugin:htmlcomment seems died and does not support Hogfather. It would be nice this plugin can support html style comment too.

so one could provide reproducible installation of the plugin.

Since DW and all plugins have been updated to current versions, I've found that the Comment Syntax Plugin interferes with standard DW syntax.

I have a text where I wanted to quote a whole paragraph in italics, like

//Some text in italics.
Should be just one paragraph.//

This should be normal text.

This worked fine before, as I expected, i.e. the whole text between the leading and ending '//' was displayed using italic font.

However, since the update to Greebo the first line after // is treated as comment, obviously until the end of the line, which matches the docs of the plugin.
Hence, the second line is displayed as normal text, and due to the '//' at the end of the second line all subsequent text is displayed with italic font.

The fix is to enclose each line of the 'italics' paragraph in '//' pairs, as in

//Some text in italics.//
//Should be just one paragraph.//

This should be normal text.

In the DW forum I got an advice to open a bug here:
https://forum.dokuwiki.org/thread/15965

However, I'm not sure what should be the expected behavior. From the plugin's point of view the new behavior sounds reasonable, but if it is then maybe there should be a note in the plugin's docs that this may interfere with the notation for italics font.