solmatas / bitterpro Goto Github PK

Would it be possible to combine both, the weight and italic axes of the variable fonts into one variable font?
This would reduce font size and required files when the font is used in different weights, together with normal and italic styles.

Hello!

This is an automatically-generated report about possible interpolation problems in Bitter[wght].ttf, as found in the Google Fonts catalog.

To download a PDF version of this report with helpful visuals of the problems, click here; Or to view it on the GitHub website, click here.

The report follows:

Glyph .notdef was not compatible:
  Masters: '', 'wght=500.0':
    Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] in '', [4, 1, 3, 2, 0, 5, 6, 8, 7, 9] in 'wght=500.0'
    Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in '', 0 in 'wght=500.0'; reversed: True
    Contour 5 start point differs: 0 in '', 0 in 'wght=500.0'; reversed: True
    Contour 6 start point differs: 0 in '', 0 in 'wght=500.0'; reversed: True
    Contour 9 start point differs: 0 in '', 0 in 'wght=500.0'; reversed: True
  Masters: 'wght=550.0', 'wght=900.0':
    Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] in 'wght=550.0', [4, 1, 3, 2, 0, 5, 6, 8, 7, 9] in 'wght=900.0'
    Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in 'wght=550.0', 0 in 'wght=900.0'; reversed: True
    Contour 5 start point differs: 0 in 'wght=550.0', 0 in 'wght=900.0'; reversed: True
    Contour 6 start point differs: 0 in 'wght=550.0', 0 in 'wght=900.0'; reversed: True
    Contour 9 start point differs: 0 in 'wght=550.0', 0 in 'wght=900.0'; reversed: True

This report was generated using the fonttools varLib.interpolatable tool. We understand that sometimes the tool generates false-positives. Particularly for more complicated font designs. If you did not find this report useful, please accept our apologies and ignore / close it.

To give feedback about this report, please file an issue or open a discussion at fonttools.

Hello,

I consider the Bitter font to be perfect and I use it in practically all my projects. recently when downloading the latest version from google fonts I noticed that there was an updated version, but this new version was actually 'Bitter Pro', and the spacing between the lines of it was quite different from the previous one.

At first I was willing to replace everything I have with the old font for the new one. However, as I used the new one I noticed, at least in my opinion, that it already seemed to be right, in larger texts it was always necessary to define a larger spacing in the app for good aesthetics.

Having said that, I would like to ask if this is a desired feature for this new version, or is it really something that will be tweaked at some point in the future.

There’s a problem in the .notdef glyph (both Roman and Italic) such that it flips direction twice as the wght axis is adjusted from 100 to 900. The flipping has these properties:

• wght=100: outlines have correct orientation
• wght=500: outlines have incorrect orientation
• wght=900: outlines have correct orientation, but appear scaled by ~102% compared with the glyph at wght=100 and wght=500

The intermediate gvar pivoting around 500 is curious as this font does not have a master at that location, only masters at 100 and 900.

Hello!

This is an automatically-generated report about possible interpolation problems in Bitter-Italic[wght].ttf, as found in the Google Fonts catalog.

To download a PDF version of this report with helpful visuals of the problems, click here; Or to view it on the GitHub website, click here.

The report follows:

Glyph .notdef was not compatible:
  Masters: '', 'wght=509.9789':
    Contour order differs: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9] in '', [4, 1, 3, 2, 0, 5, 6, 8, 7, 9] in 'wght=509.9789'
    Contour 1 start point differs: 0 in '', 0 in 'wght=509.9789'; reversed: True
    Contour 5 start point differs: 0 in '', 0 in 'wght=509.9789'; reversed: True
    Contour 6 start point differs: 0 in '', 0 in 'wght=509.9789'; reversed: True
    Contour 9 start point differs: 0 in '', 0 in 'wght=509.9789'; reversed: True

This report was generated using the fonttools varLib.interpolatable tool. We understand that sometimes the tool generates false-positives. Particularly for more complicated font designs. If you did not find this report useful, please accept our apologies and ignore / close it.

To give feedback about this report, please file an issue or open a discussion at fonttools.