[Bug] Step "Run markdown lint" ends with en error about test-with-actions HOT 5 OPEN

This error is intentional.

Even after the code is indented properly in ci.yml, you will see a build error in GitHub Actions. We'll fix this in the next step.

from test-with-actions.

@sinsukehlab is right, but I agree that the instructions expect the learner to do a lot of heavy lifting with reading so I'll leave this open but it's feedback about the course structure mostly.

from test-with-actions.

the task: "Update the code in the ci branch to get the test to pass." Clue: on line 18 there is a file. the issue has something to do with markdown syntax. i personally asked chat gpt, and thats how i reached to the solution after a long time.. good luck!

from test-with-actions.

The following line is causing the warning and error

npx remark . --use remark-preset-lint-consistent --frail

The "." is asking to check all files for markdown syntax and its warning that "resume.md" is not following the syntax.

You can use "" or "*" to markdown as italics font.
However when you use "consisent" as in the code above, then you should only use either "" or "" throughout the file.
"resume.md" started using "_" and then later it also used "", hence the warning.
(ref:https://www.npmjs.com/package/remark-lint-emphasis-marker/v/3.1.0)

The "--frail" will exits as failed when there is a warnings.
(ref: Search for "--frail" in the URL:https://github.com/remarkjs/remark-lint)

In short if you where to replace *Git* with _Git_ in the "resume.md" then you will not have any errors.

But then we don't get to do the LAB as per the instructions provided.

Also the error Screenshots mentioned in Step2 - "Review required" and "Merging is blocked" never occurs, as there were no Branch rules already to cause this error.

If at the beginning of the Step1, we add a step to create a branch rule requiring one reviewer approval then we get this error when attempting to perform the pull request after creating the ci.yml.

from test-with-actions.

Linking issue #48

@skills/technical-reviewers Would ya'll mind taking a look at this one? 👀 👍

from test-with-actions.