Suggestion: DoubleMine/BreakQueue/SequentialBreak/HAV0Xploit (you have to name it that) about seppuku HOT 13 CLOSED

sus

from seppuku.

I haven't started working on this yet but I will soon. The theory seems feasible if tps isn't wacked out

from seppuku.

not going to work, as technically the player controller can only target block at a time, so sending packets to break another block before breaking the first one would cause the first one to be canceled

from seppuku.

not going to work, as technically the player controller can only target block at a time, so sending packets to break another block before breaking the first one would cause the first one to be canceled

why can you break two blocks in sequence in low tps

from seppuku.

Because you don't have to be mining two blocks at once in order to do that.

from seppuku.

not going to work, as technically the player controller can only target block at a time, so sending packets to break another block before breaking the first one would cause the first one to be canceled

why can you break two blocks in sequence in low tps

in low tps, the server is probably taking longer to process your break which is giving the illusion of sequential breaking, I think something could be achieved by sending multiple start break packets and then sending one stop break packet (haven't tested)

from seppuku.

not going to work, as technically the player controller can only target block at a time, so sending packets to break another block before breaking the first one would cause the first one to be canceled

why can you break two blocks in sequence in low tps

in low tps, the server is probably taking longer to process your break which is giving the illusion of sequential breaking, I think something could be achieved by sending multiple start break packets and then sending one stop break packet (haven't tested)

test it then and put it in seppuku ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

from seppuku.

not going to work, as technically the player controller can only target block at a time, so sending packets to break another block before breaking the first one would cause the first one to be canceled

why can you break two blocks in sequence in low tps

in low tps, the server is probably taking longer to process your break which is giving the illusion of sequential breaking, I think something could be achieved by sending multiple start break packets and then sending one stop break packet (haven't tested)

test it then and put it in seppuku ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

tried it, didn't work.

code i used: https://pastebin.com/P4qntqwt

from seppuku.

not going to work, as technically the player controller can only target block at a time, so sending packets to break another block before breaking the first one would cause the first one to be canceled

why can you break two blocks in sequence in low tps

in low tps, the server is probably taking longer to process your break which is giving the illusion of sequential breaking, I think something could be achieved by sending multiple start break packets and then sending one stop break packet (haven't tested)

test it then and put it in seppuku ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

tried it, didn't work.

code i used: https://pastebin.com/P4qntqwt

you HAVE to wait the amount of time to break the block or more, packet speedmine will not work
Ideally, you could just bypass all the packet-y stuff and make it damage the blocks directly, but idk how thats supposed to work

from seppuku.

not going to work, as technically the player controller can only target block at a time, so sending packets to break another block before breaking the first one would cause the first one to be canceled

why can you break two blocks in sequence in low tps

in low tps, the server is probably taking longer to process your break which is giving the illusion of sequential breaking, I think something could be achieved by sending multiple start break packets and then sending one stop break packet (haven't tested)

test it then and put it in seppuku ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

tried it, didn't work.
code i used: https://pastebin.com/P4qntqwt

you HAVE to wait the amount of time to break the block or more, packet speedmine will not work
Ideally, you could just bypass all the packet-y stuff and make it damage the blocks directly, but idk how thats supposed to work

If you could send a video that would be amazing, or a really thorough step-by-step explanation would be great as well.

from seppuku.

I have gotten it to be faster, but for demonstration purposes, this works.
Ideally, it would be a 1 server tick delay between start/stop breaking in sequence, but for now, any sort of doublebreak is amazing.
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/73144620/117244511-25f8d280-ae07-11eb-8d07-2be29582f0a8.mp4

from seppuku.

Gotcha, so in order for it to work, the breaks should be delayed by one tick. I will work on it sometime tonight.

from seppuku.

can we have this closed as it has now been merged?

from seppuku.