Comments (6)
As an inspiration (https://github.com/emrex-eu/elmo-schemas/releases/tag/v1.5.0)
In the ELMO V1.5 XSD (based on a CEN Standard, optimised for Transcript of Record and diploma supplements, in use in Norway, Sweden, parts of Netherland and Poland) the grade is expressed
a) as float
b) linked to a local grading Scheme
c) accompagnied by the status information "passed" if so
d) and accompanied by the resultDistribution (we need to define whether this is needed in SDG use cases):
<learningOpportunityInstance>
<start>2014-10-01</start>
<date>2015-03-17</date>
<academicTerm>
<title xml:lang="en">Winter Semester of 2014</title>
<start>2014-10-01</start>
<end>2015-02-15</end>
</academicTerm>
<status>passed</status>
<gradingSchemeLocalId>0-100</gradingSchemeLocalId>
<resultLabel>45.1</resultLabel>
<shortenedGrading>
<percentageLower>62.3</percentageLower>
<percentageEqual>21.8</percentageEqual>
<percentageHigher>15.9</percentageHigher>
</shortenedGrading>
<resultDistribution>
<!--
Artificial (and exaggeratedly complex) grading scheme was used in this example
in order to highlight the possibility of the enormous variety of different
grading schemes which might be used throughout different countries and HEIs.
-->
<category count="43" label="Less than 20"/>
<category count="193" label="20-39.9"/>
<category count="198" label="40-59.9"/>
<category count="35" label="60-79.9"/>
<category count="7" label="80-100"/>
<description xml:lang="en">Some extra information about the description, might include links etc.</description>
<description xml:lang="pl">Po polsku...</description>
</resultDistribution>
from sdg-sandbox.
in Europass Learning Modell (EDCI) 0.10.0
https://github.com/european-commission-europass/Europass-Learning-Model
the grade
a) is expressed as percentage
b) accompagnied by information on ID validation during the examen ( I think we do not need this information)
c) semantic web RDF URI link to the organisations that specified the examen and that did the assessment
<wasDerivedFrom id="urn:epass:assessment:2" pk="d71224b4-ff4f-43eb-8251-7e89a775782d">
<identifier schemeID="LAss ID Scheme">LAssID-84</identifier>
<title>
<text content-type="text/plain" lang="en">Online Communication Management Test</text>
</title>
<description>
<text content-type="text/plain" lang="en">LAss 84 description</text>
</description>
<additionalNote>
<text content-type="text/plain" lang="en">LAss Additional Field Content 2</text>
<subject>LAss Additional Field Title</subject>
</additionalNote>
<grade>88%</grade>
<issuedDate>2020-03-30</issuedDate>
<idVerificationMethod targetFrameworkUrl="http://data.europa.eu/snb/supervision-verification/25831c2" targetNotation="nosupid" uri="http://data.europa.eu/snb/supervision-verification/df2880c5cb">
<targetName>
<text content-type="text/plain" lang="en">Unsupervised with ID Verification</text>
</targetName>
<targetFrameworkName>
<text content-type="text/plain" lang="en">Europass Standard List of Methods Of Supervision And Verification</text>
</targetFrameworkName>
</idVerificationMethod>
<assessedBy idref="urn:epass:org:3"/>
<specifiedBy idref="urn:epass:asssessmentspec:2"/>
</wasDerivedFrom>
<achievements>
<learningAchievement id="urn:epass:learningAchievement:1">
<identifier schemeID="Ach-ID-Scheme">AchID-72</identifier>
<title>
<text content-type="text/plain" lang="en">Creative Writing</text>
</title>
<description>
<text content-type="text/plain" lang="en">This achievement covers story plot creation and how to make choices in storytelling in a fictional world.</text>
</description>
<wasDerivedFrom id="urn:epass:assessment:1" pk="f6eea209-70f9-4951-9b06-ea99b251ca76">
<identifier schemeID="LAss ID Scheme">LAssID-72</identifier>
<title>
<text content-type="text/plain" lang="en">Creative Writing Assignment</text>
</title>
<description>
<text content-type="text/plain" lang="en">LAss 72 description</text>
</description>
<additionalNote>
<text content-type="text/plain" lang="en">LAss Additional Field Content 1</text>
<subject>LAss Additional Field Title</subject>
</additionalNote>
<grade>88%</grade>
<issuedDate>2020-03-30</issuedDate>
<idVerificationMethod targetFrameworkUrl="http://data.europa.eu/snb/supervision-verification/25831c2" targetNotation="nosupid" uri="http://data.europa.eu/snb/supervision-verification/df2880c5cb">
<targetName>
<text content-type="text/plain" lang="en">Unsupervised with ID Verification</text>
</targetName>
<targetFrameworkName>
<text content-type="text/plain" lang="en">Europass Standard List of Methods Of Supervision And Verification</text>
</targetFrameworkName>
</idVerificationMethod>
<assessedBy idref="urn:epass:org:2"/>
<specifiedBy idref="urn:epass:asssessmentspec:1"/>
</wasDerivedFrom>
from sdg-sandbox.
overall grade is defined as a float.
I agree with @barthanssens that defining overall grade as a float is problematic.
Different ranges and scales are probably used between member states and/or regions.
We could model it on a compex type supporting 2 different representations
- grade100 | float , numerical graqde rebased on the 100 scale (e.g 18/20 = 90/100 , or 7/10 = 70/100)
- gradeDescription | string , which will allow a string representation of the grade (e.g Excellent , honor , etc)
Even more the description of the attributes states that
overall grade | float | A mark indicating a degree of accomplishment for the whole year.
Does whole year refers to the last year of the secondary education or the average for all the years that consist the secondary education ? We shall probably include the year range that the certificate represents. #55
from sdg-sandbox.
As mentioned in issue #56, IT raised the point of multiple dates missing,
It seems to me that important dates are missing such as the issuing date, date on which the final examination took place, the school year, the date of delivery of the certification, etc.
from sdg-sandbox.
maybe we should consider grade as a measured value with a unit.
grade : {
value : "1.0"
unit: "https://edu.gov.de/academiagrades"
}
This is means that every from of grading can be represented, with a clear definition on how it should be interpreted according to the grade issuing authority.
The drawback is of-course, no easy comparison can be made, but that is then up to the reciever's end how to assess this value.
The conversion to a common interpretation like grade100percent has a subjective element in it. If there is a mapping/conversion, then this mapping should be made transparent, both for the issuers of the diploma as for the receiver. I believe the discussion on this mapping/conversion is beyond the objectives of the semantic modelling of the evidence.
from sdg-sandbox.
Thank you Sebastian, it's indeed a good idea to refer to the EDCI standard, very relevant
from sdg-sandbox.
Related Issues (20)
- Feedback additiv to Issue 176: Criminal Record (AT) HOT 2
- Feedback: Tertiary Education Evidence (AT) HOT 1
- Domain ontology vs evidence common data model HOT 1
- in general: usage of BCP47 language Codes vs. usage of Publications Office Language codes HOT 4
- Absence of a criminal record (PT) HOT 2
- Education Evidences language text variants often disallowed by "..1" cardinality HOT 1
- Absence of a criminal record - definition HOT 1
- Proposed resolutions for the Record of Results data model HOT 2
- Proposed resolutions for the Diploma Supplement data model HOT 2
- Proposed resolutions for the Diploma data model HOT 3
- Proposed resolutions for the education credentials related data model HOT 2
- Diploma supplement for all types of education HOT 1
- Use identifier in the person class instead of a "single-attribute class" student / learner HOT 1
- Add birthName to Person in all (education) evidences HOT 1
- Strip property "sex/gender" from person class in secondary education completion evidence HOT 1
- Add foaf:homepage to education institution HOT 1
- Make registeredLocation mandatory and multiple in all education evidences HOT 1
- Add qualification level to secondary education evidence HOT 1
- Use NQR/EQR instead of ISCED2011L HOT 1
- Streamline properties between secondary and tertiary education HOT 1
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from sdg-sandbox.