SK - General comments to the first 5 evidences about sdg-sandbox HOT 4 CLOSED

Thanks a lot Michal for providing a high-level feedback!

1. Good to hear that the proposed approach and data model can be validated according to you, as it supports the exchange of data and the need-to-know principle.

2. The point you raise in regards to identifiers is indeed an important ones and we need to discuss this aspect with our colleagues working on user ID and authentification.

3. Thanks for continuing the effort and let us know when you receive more feedback. Do know that the proposed data models focus on the minimum obligatory attributes so any MS may add supplementary attributes if needed.

from sdg-sandbox.

I recommend that the name of the expected identifier should be clearly distinguished in the data models if differs. In data models are many times mentioned in the field attribute name Identifier despite it has different definitions / descriptions. it will help in the mapping of identifiers.

from sdg-sandbox.

I agree to the "the need-to-know principle"

from sdg-sandbox.

On the topic of the identifier you can find more information here.

from sdg-sandbox.