Git Product home page Git Product logo

Comments (12)

dirk-thomas avatar dirk-thomas commented on July 1, 2024

It was a bad idea to move it into the rmw repository since that generates a circular repository dependency chain:

rmw_implementation (in rmw) -> rmw_opensplice_cpp (in rmw_opensplice) -> rwm (in rmw)

That was actually the reason why it was not in the rmw repo before.

from rclcpp.

dirk-thomas avatar dirk-thomas commented on July 1, 2024

ament_graph

from rclcpp.

dirk-thomas avatar dirk-thomas commented on July 1, 2024

For the same reason rosidl_default_generators should be moved out of the rosidl repo.

from rclcpp.

wjwwood avatar wjwwood commented on July 1, 2024

What's wrong with the dependency chain? Just that you can't easily get rmw without the rmw_implementation package?

from rclcpp.

dirk-thomas avatar dirk-thomas commented on July 1, 2024

Two repositories depending on each other is a not desired circular dependency. E.g. you will never be able to do a first-time release of any of the two.

from rclcpp.

wjwwood avatar wjwwood commented on July 1, 2024

Ok, I agree, then what should we do? As I see it we can either move rmw_implementation to a different existing repository or move it to its own repository.

I am leaning towards its own repository, but it would be nice to not have yet another repository to deal with.

from rclcpp.

dirk-thomas avatar dirk-thomas commented on July 1, 2024

I share your concern to keep the repo count low. But I don't think it fits well into any of the existing repos and therefore I also lean towards a new separate repo.

from rclcpp.

wjwwood avatar wjwwood commented on July 1, 2024

What should we call this repository? Just rmw_implementation?

from rclcpp.

dirk-thomas avatar dirk-thomas commented on July 1, 2024

I don't have a better suggestion and would therefore suggest to keep the name as-is.

from rclcpp.

wjwwood avatar wjwwood commented on July 1, 2024

The new repository is here: https://github.com/ros2/rmw_implementation

from rclcpp.

wjwwood avatar wjwwood commented on July 1, 2024

Ok, I've opened pull requests to address the move. Please review.

from rclcpp.

dirk-thomas avatar dirk-thomas commented on July 1, 2024

lgtm

from rclcpp.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.