@rahulprasad01 We did an automated analysis of your code to detect potential areas to improve the code quality. We are sharing the results below, to help you improve the iP code further.

IMPORTANT: Note that the script looked for just a few easy-to-detect problems only, and at-most three example are given i.e., there can be other areas/places to improve.

Aspect: Tab Usage

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Naming boolean variables/methods

Example from src/main/java/Command.java lines 4-4:

    private boolean exit = false;

Suggestion: Follow the given naming convention for boolean variables/methods (e.g., use a boolean-sounding prefix).You may ignore the above if you think the name already follows the convention (the script can report false positives in some cases)

Aspect: Brace Style

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Package Name Style

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Class Name Style

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Dead Code

Example from src/main/java/Duke.java lines 57-57:

            //String stringCommand = ui.readCommand();

Suggestion: Remove dead code from the codebase.

Aspect: Method Length

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Class size

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Header Comments

Example from src/main/java/Deadline.java lines 19-24:

    /**
     * used to retrieve data from hard drive
     * @param name
     * @param by
     * @param done
     */

Suggestion: Ensure method/class header comments follow the format specified in the coding standard, in particular, the phrasing of the overview statement.

Aspect: Recent Git Commit Message (Subject Only)

possible problems in commit 16d3a31:

GUI

• Perhaps too short (?)

possible problems in commit 1951134:

GUI

• Perhaps too short (?)

Suggestion: Follow the given conventions for Git commit messages for future commits (no need to modify past commit messages).

ℹ️ The bot account @nus-se-bot used to post this issue is un-manned. Do not reply to this post (as those replies will not be read). Instead, contact [email protected] if you want to follow up on this post.

@rahulprasad01 We did an automated analysis of your code to detect potential areas to improve the code quality. We are sharing the results below, so that you can avoid similar problems in your tP code (which will be graded more strictly for code quality).

IMPORTANT: Note that the script looked for just a few easy-to-detect problems only, and at-most three example are given i.e., there can be other areas/places to improve.

Aspect: Tab Usage

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Naming boolean variables/methods

Example from src/main/java/duke/command/Command.java lines 10-10:

    private boolean exit = false;

Suggestion: Follow the given naming convention for boolean variables/methods (e.g., use a boolean-sounding prefix).You may ignore the above if you think the name already follows the convention (the script can report false positives in some cases)

Aspect: Brace Style

Example from src/main/java/duke/storage/Storage.java lines 71-72:

            }
            else {

Example from src/main/java/duke/storage/Storage.java lines 109-110:

            }
            else {

Suggestion: As specified by the coding standard, use egyptian style braces.

Aspect: Package Name Style

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Class Name Style

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Dead Code

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Method Length

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Class size

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

Aspect: Header Comments

Example from src/main/java/duke/task/Deadline.java lines 21-26:

    /**
     * used to retrieve data from hard drive
     * @param name
     * @param by
     * @param done
     */

Suggestion: Ensure method/class header comments follow the format specified in the coding standard, in particular, the phrasing of the overview statement.

Aspect: Recent Git Commit Message (Subject Only)

possible problems in commit e18ecce:

Added shadow jar plugin

• Not in imperative mood (?)

possible problems in commit 7d63517:

Added Ui.png

• Not in imperative mood (?)

possible problems in commit f24ff57:

Added some bug fixes

• Not in imperative mood (?)

Suggestion: Follow the given conventions for Git commit messages for future commits (no need to modify past commit messages).

Aspect: Binary files in repo

No easy-to-detect issues 👍

❗ You are not required to (but you are welcome to) fix the above problems in your iP, unless you have been separately asked to resubmit the iP due to code quality issues.

ℹ️ The bot account used to post this issue is un-manned. Do not reply to this post (as those replies will not be read). Instead, contact [email protected] if you want to follow up on this post.