-
P. 17, l. -13: Cleveland should have a reference. L. -2: Figure 3.4 or 3.5?
-
P. 18 and in many places elsewhere: the month abbreviation should be changed from Spanish to English.
-
P. 19, l. 3 of Section 3.2.2: “and” appears twice; l. 5: no need for “J.” in the reference; l. 18: INDEX?
-
P. 30, l. 3: “I” or “we”?
-
Page 16 - code: Does not run. Issues with “annotate” function.
-
Page 17 - text: Typo, should be implementS
-
Page 24 - code: The latticeExtra package shares names (ie "layer") with the ggplot2 package so this code does not run if ggplot2 masks latticeExtra. Generally more code comments would make the examples more useful as templates to be customized.
-
Page 30 - code: The panel.flow function is not introduced until later in the chapter, making this example non-functional at the time it is introduced. This example would also benefit from the data being explained earlier (what are the series names referencing?)
-
Page 38 - code: These xts calls are depreciated and should be updated
-
Page 40 - code: gridSVG examples did not create interactive files on my machine.
-
Page 53 - code: variable name “month” should be “Month” (2 instances on this page)
-
Page 63 - code: missing comma in xyplot example (line 2)
-
Page 63 - code: “glayer_” function throws errors as written
-
Page 64 - code: “glayer” function also throws errors
-
Page 67 - code: another “glayer” issue:
-
Error in layer(panel.pointLabel(x, y, labels = group.value, col = palOrdered[group.number], : unused argument (superpose = TRUE)
-
I think it is something messed up in the “myTheme” formatting list provided.
-
Page 76 - code: gridSVG example does not work
-
Table of contents, sections 3.4 and 5.6 don't follow the same caps scheme as rest of TOC (and actual section text)
-
Page 17 auto.key = true or false? Different in text and code block.
-
Page 19 "and and", misspelled "lighter", and some kind of reference malfunction "INDEX"
-
Page 21 what is delta_i? A standard deviation? Why the subscript?
-
Page 27 "legend is confusing" in 3.10 but remains unchanged in updated figure 3.11. Is it still confusing? (Was it ever confusing?)
-
Page 49 "evotranspiration" misspelled. Should be evapotranspiration
-
Fig 4.3, p54: white corresponds to "zero" (no bin counts) and "30" (max of scale). Black or grey would be more appropriate for zero since black corresponds to one. In the current figure, white bins could either be empty or 30; not always clear.
-
Page 64 typo: function use(s)
-
Page 65 fig 5.3: is there more updated data (beyond 2010)? Would be interesting to see how this changed in the past 7 years
-
Page 84: a lot of wind max was removed. How was threshold = 10 chosen? (For better visuals?) looking at figure 3.1, it looks like the distribution of wind max may be too truncated.
-
Page 85: spatio-temporal or space-time, not "spatio-time" behavior
-
Page 88, last code block: complete.cases() is maybe more succinct
-
Page 90 last code block: same as above (maybe one example of each?)