openbeta / climbing-data Goto Github PK

Hi, I'm interested in using this dataset for a hobby project, but it's unclear if you (the maintainers of this dataset) actually have permission to use it. Has ADVENTURE PROJECTS, INC given you (the maintainers) permission to use and distribute this MountainProject dataset under a CC BY SA 4.0 license?

Hello,

Looking at the openbeta-usa-routes-aug-2020 dataset, it seems a lot (maybe the majority) of bouldering safety grades are missing. I recently pulled a bunch of climb data from MP and I have been comparing that to the data stored here. Looks like everything matches very well. Except, for the 21382 boulders common between this set and mine, I find that 1369 have safety ratings (PG/PG13, R, or X), but only 63 of the openbeta-usa-routes-aug-2020 boulders have safety ratings.

This can be seen in the attached .csv, my safety rating is given as "safety_y" and that from the dataset here is given as "safety_x". I looked up a number of these boulders (~50) by hand and found the safety_y rating to be correct for all these checks.

safety_check.csv

Is there a way to expand this set of data to another country?

I know many of the developers in the north part of Mexico, is there a way I can provide you the beta for further expansion?

I was looking through the dataset and it seems like higher-level areas are being excluded, and only the "lowest" level areas are being included in the dataset. For example, the area Barton Creek Greenbelt is designated as an area, but is not in the dataset. A lower-level area that is inside Barton Creek Greenbelt, Gus Fruh is included in the dataset. Is there any reason these higher order areas are being excluded?

Hey, this project looks like a very good and very important initiative.

Is it possible to add datasets from TheCrag? Their use-submitted content is licensed under CC-NCSA, so I think it's all ok to use.