openactive / activity-list-old Goto Github PK

Hi Guys,
i've seen the activity list feed in json.

Just a question about "Soccer": is it valid to consider it as alternative of "Football" activity?

Really thanks a lot.
Rgds.
Paolo.

See http://iqvoc.net/EditorialTeamTutorial.pdf for guidance

It could be interesting adding a prefSlug and altSlug for prefLabel and altLabel to make URI readble.

In our case, for example, activity is our entry point (e.g.: soccer.sportsopendata.net): it could be difficult to deliver a service by using UUID.

Using slug (pref or alt) it could be a good solution instead of RESTful way.

Right now, http://activity-list-editor.openactive.io/en/openactive_concepts.jsonld needs to be copied to
https://www.openactive.io/activity-list/activity-list.jsonld. A Travis script in https://github.com/openactive/activity-list seems like an obvious solution.

But is this the best architecture?

Currently the initial editors draft does not include any "formats". For example while we include Football, we don't currently include 5 a-side, 6 a-side, 7 a-side, etc.

Should these variations be included within the list?

What other variations are there?

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Gym.

We in fact only need contents related to display of the site and editor.

The old-style 'spec' content can be removed.

Some sports are covered by governing bodies. We should consider annotating our list to indicate the organisation that governs them.

Might be best to include a new property in the OA namespace, e.g. oa:governs to relate an Organisation to a physical activity (skos:Concept) that it governs.

Every term should have a basic description. We can draw on Wikipedia abstracts as the licensing is compatible.

Collections allow grouping together of activities that aren't directly related to one another. E.g. ball sports, or olympic sports, or SportEngland recognised sports.

Grouping makes it easier:

• for reusers to subset the list to just those activities they're interested in using
• for reusers to use the list to drive navigation, browsing, and discovery
• to reflect the variety of relationships between sports, e.g. based on type of activity, equipment, setting, etc.

In the working document we have a number of collections that have been proposed. We need to define a basic set of collections that are useful to developers, and then include those in the list.

Existing suggestions include (majority are taken from the SportSuite list):

• Sports
• Physical Activities (anything that is not formally a sport)
• SE Recognised Sports
• Combat Sports
• Martial Arts (of all forms)
• Team Sports
• Individual Sports
• Ball Games
• Throwing Sports
• Water Sports
• Olympic/Paralympic Sports
• Precision Sports
• Athletic Sports
• Endurance Sports
• Indoor Sports
• Outdoor Sports
• Racquet Sports
• Traditional Sports
• Street Sports
• Disability/Disabled Sports
• Acrobatic Sports
• Exercise, Movement and Dance
• Hybrid Sports
• Winter Sports
• Summer Sports
• Extreme Sports
• Board Sports

• Does this require a human-readable rendering of the list?
• Needs to include editorial/editorship information
• Modelled on https://data.emduk.org/activity-list/ but with IDs and descriptions too?

Noting here to consider the issues raised by openactive/implementation-tracker#153

Specifically: "people could have a go at working out the type of race (sprint/standard/middle) using the distance field, but I would assume might be more handy if there was a fixed record"

Something that may help the taxonomy when searching or building systems is adding an 'expected attendee count' parameter to the activities. This would enable brokers which are unfamiliar with all of the sporting activities to provide simple validation prompts or suggested values when Customers are filling out 'number of attendees' forms for example.

e.g.

  {
    "@type": "Concept",
    "@id": "https://openactive.io/activity-list#ab4a33f2-dc13-4f7f-afa4-a3184dc00eab",
    "prefLabel": "Baseball",
    "inScheme": "https://openactive.io/activity-list",
    "expectedAttendeeCount": {
      "min": 10,
      "max": 18
    }
  }

The current editors draft doesn't list the majority of varieties of Yoga. Currently Yoga is primarily organised under "Holistic Classes".

It may be better to:

• Promote Yoga to be a top-level term, along with the other items under Holistic Classes
• Add additional forms of Yoga as narrower terms
• Turn Holistic Classes into a Collection (see #1).

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aquabike

Level 1 (TOP TERMS) = Triathlon
Level 2 (BROADER TERM) = Aquabike

(in my opinion)

The following concept has expired but remains a narrower concept. Should this be removed or are consuming clients expected to filter this out with some lookup logic?

https://github.com/openactive/activity-list/blob/83789e7a38784a533ae36672ac7f97822a05ae4d/activity-list.jsonld#L5892

The AiT Activity List has been shared with the the OpenActive CG under an open licence.

We should review the detail of this list and consider including it in the current draft. The list includes:

• around 300 terms
• organises activities into broader categories (top term) and types
• has a well-organised list of Yoga, Martial Arts, Individual and Team Sports (as the main top level categories)
• a set of top-level categories that could be used to inform discussion of #1.

Just "Rugby" alone may mislead people to think it's actually rugby

Afraid this is a bit more niche so it doesn't really exist, for example, on Wikipedia yet but we do have some run and bike events within multisport. Duathlons (run/bike/run) are much more popular but without a run/bike listing on the activity list we have no value to return for the few such events that we do have.

Level 1 (TOP TERMS) = Triathlon
Level 2 (BROADER TERM) = Run/Bike

Sports and recreation is a skos:broadMatch for our top-level terms.
http://standards.esd.org.uk/?uri=subject%2F896&tab=details

By linking the terms to their Wikidata equivalents, it opens up an easy way to access additional information such as:

• OSM keys
• Wikipedia pages and categories
• Alternative categorisations, e.g. whether team sports, winter sports, etc
• Links to related organisations where present (this might be something to enter into Wikidata instead of as part of this taxonomy? Could help with #11?)

In the initial editors draft, the merged activity list includes disabled sports as variants of another sport, e.g. wheelchair football is a narrower term than football. This has been applied more or less consistently across the list. But is this the right way to organise the list?

Disabled sports and activities can be highlighted as a Collection (see #1) which would provide an alternative way to highlight those activities for relevant audiences.

Copied from TODO list on https://trello.com/c/caUtJD6K.

@nickevansuk: can you expand on this description? I'm not entirely sure what's required here.

Error message: "Polocrosse as nested within Equestrian and marked as a top concept which isn't valid"

Confirmed with British Cycling we need to update the list as follows:

1. Move Mountain Biking under Cycling
2. Add BMX and Freestyle BMX
3. Move BMX racing and Freestyle BMX under BMX
4. Add Recreational Cycling (id: "https://openactive.io/activity-list#be4762de-b26c-4bd2-bcf2-4e54b58e7830") under Cycling
5. Add Disability Cycling under Cycling

The result of the should be:

• Cycling
  • BMX
    • BMX racing
    • Freestyle BMX
  • Commuter Cycling
  • Cyclo-Cross
  • Disability Cycling
  • Handcycling
  • Mountain Biking
  • Racing
  • Recreational Cycling
  • Road Cycling
  • Track Cycling

Currently there is no grouping for Chinese Martial Arts (CMA) or, more broadly, all forms of Martial Arts. However the Sport England recognised sport list does use (CMA) as a category.

We should consider:

• Adding Chinese Martial Arts as a top-level term
• Moving the appropriate martial arts to be narrower terms
• Add Martial Arts as a Collection, as suggested in #1.

Existing EMD collections need to be added, specifically:

• https://data.emduk.org/collections/strength-and-conditioning.jsonld
• https://data.emduk.org/collections/cardio.jsonld
• https://data.emduk.org/collections/holistic.jsonld