There are a few emoji that are available both with a gender and in a neutral version:
{
"annotation": "genie",
"name": "GENIE",
"hexcode": "1F9DE",
"shortcodes": [
"genie"
],
"tags": [
"djinn"
],
"emoji": "๐ง",
"text": "",
"type": 1,
"order": 1507,
"group": 1,
"subgroup": 25,
"version": 5
},
{
"annotation": "man genie",
"name": "GENIE, MALE SIGN",
"hexcode": "1F9DE-200D-2642-FE0F",
"shortcodes": [
"man_genie"
],
"tags": [
"djinn"
],
"emoji": "๐งโโ๏ธ",
"text": "",
"type": 1,
"order": 1508,
"group": 1,
"subgroup": 25,
"version": 5,
"gender": 1
},
{
"annotation": "woman genie",
"name": "GENIE, FEMALE SIGN",
"hexcode": "1F9DE-200D-2640-FE0F",
"shortcodes": [
"woman_genie"
],
"tags": [
"djinn"
],
"emoji": "๐งโโ๏ธ",
"text": "",
"type": 1,
"order": 1510,
"group": 1,
"subgroup": 25,
"version": 5,
"gender": 0
},
It would be fantastic, if you could mark emoji that have gendered versions available, but are neutral. For skintones, that's possible by checking whether a skins
field is present (if there is, it's the neutral version), but for genders that's not possible.
Regarding notation, I'm unsure what would be best. Maybe "gender": null
, "gender": -1
or "gender_neutral": true
?