This workshop is scheduled for an update. Please review the contents of this repo and comment on this issue with suggested updates. All suggestions must be added to this issue by EOD 11/9/2018.

Testfix complete. Assigning to Michael for final review.

I noticed we're missing information about DBCompat and our slight change in focus to certify to a compatibility level rather than a specific engine version and/or platform (on-prem vs. Azure). More info here: https://aka.ms/dbcompat

Customer objections. 6 questions asked, 5 answered. I filled in question # 6, please complete it.

@mwasham @Jeff-Opsgility
Hello,
This workshop is scheduled for a June 2019 update to the WDS and an addition a lab. Please review the workshop and provide your update suggestions to be sent for SME review.
Thanks, Dawnmarie

Need to go through documents and check your bullet formatting please.
In some sections your have dot bullets, others you have numbers. In both cases, some indent to an a. b. c. - in other places they indent into a i. ii. iii

FYI - bulleted sentences do not have ending punctuation unless there are multiple sentences, a question mark, or a colon. I've removed punctuation throughout.

Please check bullet formatting in the Design a proof of concept solution section. You go from dot bullets to alphabet bullets. Whatever you correct to in the trainer guide, please do the same here.

• Remove Velostrata as acquired by Google
• I thought TSO Logic was a partner now, it is missing
• Refactor is inaccurate – it doesn’t have to be first party PaaS to do this. It can in fact be utilizing Infra as code and this is a far more commons scenario – i.e. Terraform with ansible or chef tied into the CI/CD pipeline and releases.
• Re-architect and refactor are confusing IMO. I personally believe using App Service, Infra as Code or Containers fits these descriptions. Modernising traditional apps can be done with containers (.net or Java) or Infra as code. Also we are talking about AKS only – no inclusion for openshift, DC/OS, Docker EE or other third party container management solution?
• Rebuild is talking about first party azure PaaS only. A lot of customers will look at cloud foundry as an alternate solution
• Optimize – BCDR talks about VM and SQL backup only. What happens in the instance that they customer utilizes a container based solution or cloud foundry? Also Backup is mentioned here only – where is the DR portion? Whether through ASR, resilient build of architecture or 3rd party
• Slide 30 misspelling of “eligible”

Hello. I made several formatting changes to the PPT, renamed it to follow current naming conventions, and uploaded the new file to GitHub. Please make sure to use my PPT deck to update what's below so we don't lose my updates.

Slide 9 - images need to be flat (not several boxes) and alt-text needs to explain it in one box. There's alt-text for the cloud and the building, but not what it's supposed to mean. I've flattened the image, please fill in the alt-text and describe what it's depicting.
Slide 10 - missing alt-text
Slide 11 - missing alt-text
Slide 19 - missing alt-text
Slide 21 - missing alt-text - Notes say: Update to use Extended Security Updates & Add TCO calc (I think that's from our last meeting)
Slide 22 - 29 Images need to be flat & add alt-text
Slide 30 - presenter notes say remove premium assurance??
Slide 34 - presenter notes say Region/country...not sure what that means. I changed your objection to countries or regions per CELA, was that a meeting note?
Slide 35 - I added this one. You asked 6 customer objections but only answered 5. Need to fill in answer for this one too.

Please change folder name to Whiteboard design session on the main page (from WDS).
We don't use the acronym until inside that folder.

Please update abstract to our new style, see template for example.