[Enhancement] Keep the arity of generic types in their name construction about clrmd HOT 2 CLOSED

Hello,

I am currently using ClrMd for a professional project, and my company doesn't allow us yet to contribute to open source projects (mostly for legal reasons). They are working on it and in a few months, I would be authorized to submit a pull request to your repo.

In the mean time, I am working on a local clone of your repository. And I create here all the tickets that correspond to the commit I have made on my local repo, mostly to have your feedback in those points, and also in case that you want to correct them directly.

Regards,
Fred

from clrmd.

Sorry, I think I'm going to reject this one. I don't plan to keep the arity of generic types in the name.

In the future (1.2) I plan to try to tackle generics in a better way...but due to the underlying API surface area of ClrMD (the dac) it's very, very difficult to handle generics correctly in all cases, so we will have to see what can be done then.

from clrmd.