matteo-dunnhofer / fpv-tracking-baselines Goto Github PK

I'm testing out LTMU-H for TREK-150 and finding that even after setting up 100DoH and the LTMU setup + extracting and running TREK-150 (and verifying that the rest of the toolkit works), I'm unable to run evaluation for LTMU-H because the HIC detector python file doesn't seem to register the "model" package correctly. Basically the error is happening here:

import sys
sys.path.append('./hand_object_detector')
from model.utils.config import cfg, cfg_from_file, cfg_from_list, get_output_dir
from model.rpn.bbox_transform import clip_boxes
from model.roi_layers import nms
from model.rpn.bbox_transform import bbox_transform_inv
from model.utils.net_utils import filter_object, save_net, load_net, vis_detections, vis_detections_PIL, vis_detections_filtered_objects_PIL, vis_detections_filtered_objects # (1) here add a function to viz
from model.utils.blob import im_list_to_blob
from model.faster_rcnn.vgg16 import vgg16
from model.faster_rcnn.resnet import resnet

with the actual error being

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/vap43/fpv-tracking-baselines/LTMU-H/evaluate_trek150.py", line 4, in <module>
    from ltmuh import LTMUH
  File "/home/vap43/fpv-tracking-baselines/LTMU-H/ltmuh.py", line 30, in <module>
    from hic_detector import hic_config, hic_detect
  File "/home/vap43/fpv-tracking-baselines/LTMU-H/./hic_detector.py", line 13, in <module>
    from model.utils.config import cfg, cfg_from_file, cfg_from_list, get_output_dir
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'model.utils'; 'model' is not a package

Any idea what's going on? I'm looking to use this for a downstream task but am confused as to why the HIC is failing on this import: is there some setup issue?

Congratulations on the great work! I'm very interested in your work and evaluations. Would you be able to share the code described in the paper about OPE-D Evaluations? Thank you very much!

Hi there, thanks so much for the great work and toolkit for future benchmarks!

I'm running the LTMU-H baseline for TREK-150 under the OPE protocol to get some initial understanding of quantitative performance, and I'm finding that SS, NPS, and GSS are significantly lower than what's reported in the paper. I've posted my values below.

I followed the initial guidelines, so my initial thought is that there's something different between my setup and the setup used to run evaluation. Any idea as to what's going on?