maticnetwork / blockscout Goto Github PK

Clicking "Connect to Metamask" here doesn't do anything.
Workaround: Connect to the explorer manually using metamask

Environment

• Elixir & Erlang/OTP versions (elixir -version):
• Operating System: Windows, Chrome Version 86.0.4240.75 (Official Build) (64-bit)
• Blockscout Version/branch: v3.3.3-beta

Steps to reproduce

1. Go to https://explorer.matic.network/address/0x83c3Df21FeDFF9f92669953ac12686Cf144e375C/write-contract
2. Click "Connect to Metamask"

Expected behaviour

After clicking the button, a metamask popup should appear asking us if we want to connect to the explorer.

Actual behaviour

After clicking the button, no popup appears.

Sending Mana from my Matic Mainnet network on MetaMask to Ethereum Mainnet and it failed, received "Error: (Awaiting internal transactions for reason)".

Transaction Details here:

https://explorer-mainnet.maticvigil.com/tx/0x9717d87d03f89eeb3c576e265392afee87d1cac065b9d98a5644f29f2b4acfa6/internal-transactions

Environment

• Elixir Version: 1.11.3

• Erlang Version: 23

• BlockScout Version: v3.6.0-beta

• User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/89.0.4389.128 Safari/537.36

Steps to reproduce

*In MetaMask extension select Matic MainNet network where MANA is being held. Select Mana Token and select Send. Select "Transfer Between my Accounts". Select the main account in this case (Ethereum Mainnet network account). Select the amount you want send over and pay a gas fee. Select the Next button and wait. *

Expected Behaviour

Supposed to send and receive MANA from Matic MainNet to Ethereum MainNet.

Actual Behaviour

Transaction failed and lost MANA in transaction.

Currently, its very hard to "Verify&Publish" contracts on Matic networks: the code has to be flattened (since Matic's BlockExporer doesn't support "standard-json" input format, or even the "metadata.json" format

With abi coder v2, flattened contracts generate different bytecode from non-flattened contracts . This a contract that was deployed on one network, cannot be re-dpeloyed on matic and have its code source-verifyed.

If Matic's blockexplorer would support Sourcify (just like xdai does), then deployment would be come much simpler.

Steps to reproduce

Try to deploy a contract that was compiled from multiple source files.

Expected behaviour

Should be able to publish

Actual behaviour

There is no way to upload entire source tree, so can't be published.

I recently transferred IGG Gold from iggalaxy.com to my matic wallet after swapping it to ERC20. On etherscan it says the transfer was successful. However, it never showed up in my wallet. What did I do incorrectly and how can I get it back to its original wallet or to my matic wallet.

Thnaks,

David

Environment

• Elixir & Erlang/OTP versions (elixir -version):
• Operating System:
• Blockscout Version/branch:

Steps to reproduce

Tell us how to reproduce this issue. ❤️ if you can push up a branch to your fork with a regression test we can run to reproduce locally.

Expected behaviour

Tell us what should happen.

Actual behaviour

Tell us what happens instead.

Hello,
I have a problem with payment from ethermine org.... I made it with Matic (daily payment). I have metamask wallet and nothing came... ETH was sent from pool yesterday but nothing came 🙏
Thank you for fasf reply
Adam Hoferka

0xf418743f250a9b3e14e27971c3cbebd5f7d5aaff83809723369b0750277220f4

Environment

• Elixir & Erlang/OTP versions (elixir -version):
• Operating System:
• Blockscout Version/branch:

Steps to reproduce

Tell us how to reproduce this issue. ❤️ if you can push up a branch to your fork with a regression test we can run to reproduce locally.

Expected behaviour

Tell us what should happen.

Actual behaviour

Tell us what happens instead.

Hi There,
these transfers from ethermine pool to my wallet are stuck, never received:
TX hash: 0xf39dac2d09afa42c54b454999ded2240d15eab033f66d2721d16e81738811c75

and

TX hash: 0xa72bffefeaf088e2b42a76d083a2fa6655a572c8475ca7ad2b38184b89e23813

my wallet address; 0x06F378276a0eEf1Db776Da02DeB0630d456f4954

Thank you in advance

Describe your issue here.

Transfer of 25.69 CEL shows successful but not received. Is there a way that I can have this cancelled and put back into my mainnet account? If not, how can this be retrieved?

Transaction details can be found in the link below:

https://explorer-mainnet.maticvigil.com/tx/0x5028f0d6f002fc3e2740b75f310873681d86865b72183d9b8ed868295553c645/raw-trace

Thank you in advance for your help and assistance

Environment

• Elixir & Erlang/OTP versions (elixir -version):
• Operating System:
• Blockscout Version/branch:

Steps to reproduce

Tell us how to reproduce this issue. ❤️ if you can push up a branch to your fork with a regression test we can run to reproduce locally.

Expected behaviour

Tell us what should happen.

Actual behaviour

Tell us what happens instead.

I processed transfer from Matic network from metamask platform to OXEx exchange.

Please assist to get back my token back to my metamask matic wallet 0xffAd791Ad8955e619AE722de64aB72E6cCD84954

Please see below details

Thank you for your assistance.

Thanks & regards

Rajesh

Transaction details

0x44ae7dbc51a37f6e50dd76706f270c84860b67f22540be1845cc13ee87d90cf7

token name - Matic

Amount $419

From 0xffAd791Ad8955e619AE722de64aB72E6cCD84954

To 0x362033192118aAeC96e741c74e37432E95e492Db

Background Logs (Chrome) shows below
bg-libs.js:16 Invalid asm.js: Unexpected toke

Describe your issue here.
Tried to send my token from metamask to my coinbase account but during the transaction it said "user rejected". My token was then removed from my account even though it wasn't process

Environment

• Elixir & Erlang/OTP versions (elixir -version):
• Operating System:
• Blockscout Version/branch:

Steps to reproduce

Tell us how to reproduce this issue. ❤️ if you can push up a branch to your fork with a regression test we can run to reproduce locally.

Expected behaviour

Tell us what should happen.
Been trying to solve this issue for months now with metamask and now I am here trying to find some more answer on why I can't see my time or why it disappeared. Tried sending from metamask to coinbase lost token after saying user rejected

Actual behaviour

Tell us what happens instead.
Token disappeared but I can see it on the Matic network.

Describe your issue here.

Hi, I created a LP for Blackswap on Quickswap platform. A SOLAR-WMATIC LP. I put 26.186 WMATIC and 125.316 SOLAR in order to create 41.863 SOLAR-WMATIC LP (UNI-V2). I can see in the transaction details on mainnet the transactions among my Metamask and the platform.

After 2-3 minutes I removed this liquidity, splitting the SOLAR-WMATIC LP on quickswap and I just received 94.540 SOLAR. I checked the transaction details on the mainnet and, a part from this 94.54 solar, there are no transaction towards my metamask address.

How can I ask to check these transactions?

Thank you

Environment

• Elixir & Erlang/OTP versions (elixir -version):
• Operating System:
• Blockscout Version/branch:

Steps to reproduce

Tell us how to reproduce this issue. ❤️ if you can push up a branch to your fork with a regression test we can run to reproduce locally.

Expected behaviour

Tell us what should happen.

Actual behaviour

Tell us what happens instead.

Transaction Hash - 0x55479db478969d5eae31e8ebdf1e22bed2c3e3bfaaefb9e0fdbffa8ceec29029

I have transferred 58 MATIC from metamask to wazirX, its been 10days but token is not received in my wazirX wallet. Please reverse the transaction and credit metic in my metic mainnet wallet.
Please help me, i am very poon girl and I need money for medicine.

Please email me on [email protected]

Environment

• Elixir & Erlang/OTP versions (elixir -version):
• Operating System:
• Blockscout Version/branch:

Steps to reproduce

Tell us how to reproduce this issue. ❤️ if you can push up a branch to your fork with a regression test we can run to reproduce locally.

Expected behaviour

Tell us what should happen.

Actual behaviour

Tell us what happens instead.

Describe your issue here. I sent USDC from Metamusk Matic network to wrong address on binance usdc address (erc20). Binance do not support Matic Network. Its possible to receive my USDC back?

TXID : 0x459f95750f8db9373c641930443c9a35a26f0db54964a47eeb74ca46cfed80a2

Environment

• Elixir & Erlang/OTP versions (elixir -version):
• Operating System:
• Blockscout Version/branch:

Steps to reproduce

Tell us how to reproduce this issue. ❤️ if you can push up a branch to your fork with a regression test we can run to reproduce locally.

Expected behaviour

Tell us what should happen.

Actual behaviour

Tell us what happens instead.

Environment

online version in : https://mumbai-explorer.matic.today/address/0xB90547a6F35Fb7C9121967FDb5490bA08500E51E/read-contract

Steps to reproduce

verify the contract with truffle-flattener

Expected behaviour

Verificated code and read contract with success

Actual behaviour

Code verificated but in read contract tab i got Internal server error.

When I tried to verify and publish contracts on Mumbai, I got this error:
There was an error compiling your contract: Duplicate experimental feature name.
and after that, I removed this pragma from the contract I got this error: There was an error compiling your contract: This type is only supported in ABIEncoderV2. Use "pragma experimental ABIEncoderV2;" to enable the feature.
these contracts are verified on other networks, what can I do to fix this?
Thanks in advance

Environment

• Elixir Version: 1.11.0

• Erlang Version: 23

• BlockScout Version: v3.5.1-beta

• User Agent: Chrome/88.0.4324.150

Steps to reproduce

Stakemanger contract:
Deployed contract on Mumbai: https://explorer-mumbai.maticvigil.com/address/0xAf125437DcC14E692e7b7BC931CE7922910Afb15/contracts

Deployed contract and verified version on Etheruem mainnet: https://etherscan.io/address/0xcAA46E3a5D2c3c07A0C4F7723c7977c3e643C2B1#contracts

StakeManager contract on GitHub: https://github.com/opengsn/gsn/blob/v2.0.1/contracts/StakeManager.sol

flatten version of StakeManager i tried to verify: https://gist.github.com/amirhabibzadeh/52c73b2b091fd5fc7893a10458baeb03

Expected Behaviour

Do the job and verify!

Actual Behaviour

Shows an error!

Describe your issue here.

Tried to see verified code of RelayHub contract, but it claims it is the same bytecode (and thus same source) as another contract.

Environment

• Elixir Version: 1.11.0

• Erlang Version: 23

• BlockScout Version: v3.5.1-beta

• User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_14_6) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/88.0.4324.150 Safari/537.36

Steps to reproduce

open https://explorer-mainnet.maticvigil.com/address/0x8aA57981F63a38D527DB699135bE69a48Ca103b0/contracts
This is a RelayHub contract, much like https://blockscout.com/poa/xdai/address/0x63DD60B79cb8E3d2FA20A6d2EC92e101553a3920/contracts which was verified correctly.

Expected Behaviour

Show the right source code, or at least don't claim its source is of another contract (and let Verify&Publish)

Actual Behaviour

However, it claims it has the same code and some other contract named "EACAggregatorProxy"
Which it obviously isn't. (try the "Read Contract" page - the ABI is completely wrong, so all methods fail)

Somehow, it got it all wrong and think these contracts share code - which they don't.

(originally reported against blockscout here, but they claim its not a bug in blockscout itself, but specifically in Matic)

0xd612ef51d6f9ecf56c17dc0f5c58807e2578e243509368e09e2f67315976289f

The ticker needs to be updated

https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/mover

Polygon token address is 0x521cddc0cba84f14c69c1e99249f781aa73ee0bc

Describe your issue here.
Transfer of 2000 MATIC Tokens 22hrs ago from my wallet on Crypto.com to my D’Cent MATIC/ Polygon wallet. The transfer said it was successful however I never received any MATIC. The transfer fee was 20 MATIC so on the blockscout it would show up as 1980 MATIC tokens! CAN SOMEONE PLEASE help me recover my funds?! That was all I had to invest. My MATIC/Polygon address on D’CENT: 0x32eee58Ad586022b9d90Ee30D73A03C752C7A683

my understanding was there were or still are several similar issues regarding the transferring of MATIC tokens. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated as I’m new to this space and don’t really know what to do!

My email: [email protected]

I’ll provide a cell number if necessary in an email response. Thank you in advance

Environment

• Elixir & Erlang/OTP versions (elixir -version):
• Operating System:
• Blockscout Version/branch:

Steps to reproduce

Tell us how to reproduce this issue. ❤️ if you can push up a branch to your fork with a regression test we can run to reproduce locally.

Expected behaviour

Tell us what should happen.

Actual behaviour

Tell us what happens instead.

I sent my Matic from Matic network on Metamask to Binance on the Erc20 network and I'm still waiting... it's been 8 days now. is that mean my Matic was gone ??
transaction details :
https://explorer.matic.network//tx/0xe70c281d1302814f682f89be0686b806be4d3d5dd8ea20dc452bd454fd4161f7

Hello, maticvigil failed to take into account one of my transaction that I did 5 days ago.
I have sent all my USDT tokens from my matic adresss A to my matic addresse B created on instadapp.io,
and i used the matic address B to spent those USDT token on the platform.
However maticvigil doesn't report the outgoing transaction on my matic address A and I still see my usdt tokens in the token balance page. Metamask show the correct balance which is 0.

Environment
https://explorer-mainnet.maticvigil.com/

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/90.0.4430.212 Safari/537.36
Steps to reproduce
Don't know how to reproduce it

Expected Behaviour
Matic vigil track all transaction

Actual Behaviour
Matic vigil misses some transactions