Differences in electronic speech about voice-type-classifier HOT 4 CLOSED

Hi !

The "new" model was significantly better than the "old" model on every classes. This old version is just something we obtained while developing our model until converging to the published results (that have been obtained with the "new" model).
But none of these models have been trained on electronical speech as we don't have this label in our training set. We just have the ELE class on our held-out set, meaning that we can just have a look at how ELE frames are classified by the model (into SPEECH, or SIL for instance).

If we compare model 1 and model 2 performances on the test set (containing KCHI, CHI, MAL, FEM, SPEECH labels) and if we assume that model 1 is consistently better than model 2, it is very likely than model 1 will be better at identifying ELE frames as being SIL (even though it hasn't been trained to classify this specific class).

Also, I'd like to know if there are plans to include an "electronic speech" label which come in handy for our research.

Not in the near future unfortunately ! But we never know :)

Closing this issue. Feel free to reopen if you have any other related questions !

from voice-type-classifier.