lnv42 / proxmark3 Goto Github PK

Issue created based on discussion with Iceman1001 in 0ada0e5#comments

last message from lnv42:

OK. i misinterpreted some clone functions available for a lot of tag type. They are actually just "restore" functions.
I was not aware of your fork that seems to be more advanced (at least for iso15). I will pick things from your fork. But i wonder why you don't PR your improvements into the main proxmark repo ?
My main goal is to develop a fully working simulator for iso15 (not supporting only inventory cmd) (i started in the "tmp" branch of my fork). I also plan to do some factorization because currently (at least in the main repo) there are a lot of duplicated codes. I will try to use your work as much as possible. If you have any others suggestions please inform me as soon as possible. ;)

Response from Iceman1001:

Its not the right place to disucss intentions inside one of your commits. Either on the forum or in a issue..
I tend to create issues for iceman fork in order to keep track of my idea of making it better.

There are many reasons for me not making PR's, which I also address in my readme.md , but in short since I can't merge with pm3 offical any longer, I don't have time/energy to sit and create a cherrypicked PR.
There is also the fact many of my ideas is not considered suitable, so I started my fork in order to make a pm3 firmware/client the way I would like to work with it. With consistencies among commands and structures. However while I fiddle with plenty of stuff, I also tend to break things. Which makes my fork highly unstable from time to time ;)

Go for the 15 sim, its one of the older issues on pm3 offical Proxmark#20