Output of SpliceER about splicer HOT 3 OPEN

Hi Brian,
that should be correct. You can double check which column is a and b since
usually there are a lot more "clean" compared to "dirty" reads. That is the
case in the result files in the examples folder.
I am currently traveling and therefore limited in my ability to confirm.
Please don't hesitate to ask if you have any more questions.

Lukas
On Jun 3, 2016 10:25 AM, "bswhite" [email protected] wrote:

As far as I can tell from reading the code and looking at the output of a
few select cases, the 3-column output of splicer.py is:
junction name
number of b reads (i.e., number of "clean" exon-exon reads)
number of a reads (i.e., number of "dirty" exon-intron reads)

I would love for the author and/or other users to confirm.

Thanks,
Brian

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#1, or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ALJEg__05FZv5cb4jMFS_FhzfzBClbl3ks5qIDlQgaJpZM4ItlUn
.

from splicer.

Hi Lukas,

Thanks for your quick response. Yes, I confirm in my data as well that the second column has many more reads than the third, like you say, as expected for clean exon-exon reads.

Brian

from splicer.

Thanks for confirming.
On Jun 3, 2016 11:16 AM, "bswhite" [email protected] wrote:

Hi Lukas,

Thanks for your quick response. Yes, I confirm in my data as well that the
second column has many more reads than the third, like you say, as expected
for clean exon-exon reads.

Brian

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#1 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ALJEg9ytGb3b43lAbvmDVWItb3rNnO4Gks5qIEVCgaJpZM4ItlUn
.

from splicer.