licybora / nanodefenderfirefox Goto Github PK

Test link (required):

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1gV6kYi-qP0lUIxtVcklMrusd8p2q9d08

Screenshot of the web page (including address bar and extension icons) (required):

Waiting about ~30 seconds for Google to "pass" a negatively controlled file under a virus account is "unacceptable" to me.

Screenshot of the console (press F12 to bring up the console) (required):

N/A

Explain what was not right (optional if obvious):

Block csp reports on gdrive block download files - generate error:

Nie udało się przeskanować pliku "Flash_NPAPI_(32-64_bit)_**_**_***.7z"

The file could not be scanned "Flash_NPAPI_(32-64_bit)_**_**_***.7z"

Reproduction steps (optional if trivial):

1. open url
2. try click in any archive 7z
3. in pop-up try stard download file
4. scan file by Google unnecessarily extended (usually up to 15 seconds, by blocking reports 30 seconds or even 1 minute) waiting to download 7z archive.

Environment (Required):

• Operating System and Version: Windows 10
• Browser and Version: Firefox 71
• Adblocker and Version: 1.0.131

Your filter lists (Required):

N/A

Your custom filters (Required if you have any):

N/A

Add everything else that you believe to be useful below (optional):

Run a list of domains where CSP reports will be allowed?

https://github.com/NanoAdblocker/NanoCore2/blob/master/notes/dashboard_my_rules.md#dashboard---my-rules

drive.google.com https://clients6.google.com/drive/v2internal/viewerimpressions xmlhttprequest allow

Hi

I love this extension but have Firefox problem, not on Chrome and its extra white space that looks ugly can you fix it? Thanks :)

It returns me a connection error when I try to download the .xpi file

Forwarded from NanoMeow/QuickReports#942

As someone misunderstand my future plan, let me put words at begin.

Nano Adblocker is abandoned at the time new upstream devs push their privacy policy. There is no plan to continue Nano Adblocker and urge user migrate to uBO. v1.0.0.154 is released, meaning the end of Nano Adblocker.

Nano Defender is planned to rename as a new project which is independent form any entities or people. I have never claimed abandon Nano Defender, unless I make a typo I do not notice and please let me know in this case.

If you don't trust, check my edit history of this thread.

As upstream project has been acquired by new developers, and until the time this issue post, no words are received from new upstream developers. It is time to reconsider the future of the port. Again, I am neutral to upstream decision. Everyone may have their hard time and it is their rights to decide what to do in their life. Do not blame anyone for that.

Initially, I am not hostile to the new developers, but the recent updates seems untrustworthy to me. Although their removal of privacy policy on Chrome Store is suspicious enough, the bigger issue is that every links found on Chrome store still link to the old developers repository, while the former developer claims he already lost control of his extension. Given that I cannot find their repository anywhere, nor neither they exist on the issue tracker to introduce themselves as new developers, I really doubt whether the "two developers" exist, as I don't see any reasons to hide themselves to their users. It is unlikely I will maintain this port for them under current situation, unless they at least show up on somewhere that can be interacted with. I hope these are just because they still not yet post or update anything in this early stage...

So, the remaining options will be abandon or maintain as a new project in worst case. But the later case is a tough job. Not only just two extensions, but also Nano Filters, NanoMeow and Nano resources. Without them, Nano Adblocker is just a uBO clone and Nano Defender is just some user scripts. Given that I am not as active and experienced as the upstream developers, I really afraid I will do more harm than benefit to user if I make mistake on that.

For now, I will release one more version of NA that update included the last former developer changes, but I am not sure what's next if still no words from upstream. ND may still be updated when needed as it is designed working on uBO as well even decided to detach from upstream. Related links of announcement will be included in release notes and README as well when released, which is supposed to be within two days.

I am still open to any decisions, including the new developers given that they are good but just I misunderstood them[1]. Decision is now firmed, see below.

TL;DR

• NA will most likely no longer receive future update unless upstream maintain themselves or at least, they contact me for that.
• ND may still be updated, but whether maintain independently from upstream depends on their stance. might be renamed and released as a new product deal to bad reputation of the name "Nano Defender" since Chrome 15.0.0.206 can be consider as malware.

NA and ND with LiCybora as author on AMO or on my GitHub repository are still under my control and independent from any entities or people.

[1] They update their privacy policy but still keep themselves stealth from GitHub, which means they are active and purposefully hide themselves. There is no point to maintain for an unidentifiable developer.

I noticed that when using the addon "All tabs helper" if you enable "nano defender" it will make the addon not be able to properly read wich tabs are unloaded. For example if you have a session with multiple tabs open and all suspended the addon "all tabs helper" will show them on the list greyed out but as soon as you enable "nano defender" all those tab show like normal tabs (not greyed out). I don't know why nano defender is affecting other addons (besides adblockers).

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/all-tabs-helper/

I'm on firefox 65b12 x64 dev edition on Win7 x64

Tested on a clean profile with just nano defender and all tabs addon

Details:
This version did not pass the review because of the following issues:

1) eval uses are generally not allowed for security and performance reasons. eval is only necessary in rare cases. Please use a different method or explain why eval is required in your add-on.
For more information: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/eval#Never_use_eval!

TBH, eval exist only three times, while two are patching the eval function to prevent further detection of adblocker instead of calling eval. The remaining one will call eval due to the replacement of function name for bypassing detection. Maybe they think is one is problematic.

The only workaround now is to disable the remaining one rule which is actually use of eval.

Test link (required):

https://honeyhunterworld.com/mhwb/

Screenshot of the web page (including address bar and extension icons) (required):

https://i.imgur.com/tHz1x7j.png

Screenshot of the console (press F12 to bring up the console) (required):

https://i.imgur.com/P8r6V8G.png

Explain what was not right (optional if obvious):

It should proceed to the next screen, but instead it stops at this point. This works in Chrome, using the Chrome versions of Nano Adblocker and Nano Defender.

Environment (Required):

• Operating System and Version: Windows 7 x64, SP1, latest updates as of a month or so ago
• Browser and Version: Firefox, 65.0.1, 64-bit. This site works in Chrome.
• Adblocker and Version: Nano Adblocker 1.0.0.87 and Nano Defender, v15.0.0.94 (AMO only). .93 from GitHub exhibits the same problem.

Your filter lists (Required):

https://i.imgur.com/PrN0AZx.png

Add everything else that you believe to be useful below (optional):

The site works if the site is whitelisted in Nano Adblocker. The site works in the current version of Chrome with Nano Adblocker and Nano Defender from the "web store".

Test link (required):

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/terror-financing-nia-summons-mirwaiz-geelanis-son-for-questioning-in-delhi/articleshow/68334840.cms
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/business/chinas-gdp-growth-pace-was-inflated-for-nine-years-study-finds/articleshow/68330636.cms
https://navbharattimes.indiatimes.com/business/business-news/surat-metro-rail-project-approves-government/articleshow/68337333.cms
https://punemirror.indiatimes.com/news/india/nia-summons-hurriyat-m-chairman-mirwaiz-umar-farooq-to-new-delhi/articleshow/68336205.cms
https://maharashtratimes.indiatimes.com/business/business-news/salary-increments-in-most-sectors-likely-to-be-higher-than-last-year-says-aon-survey/articleshow/68336840.cms
https://eisamay.indiatimes.com/nation/rahul-gandhi-asks-pm-modi-to-tell-nation-who-released-masood-azhar-from-jail/articleshow/68337561.cms
https://vijaykarnataka.indiatimes.com/business/news/pnb-scamster-nirav-modi-tracked-down-to-swanky-london-apartment-uk-home-secretary-cerifices-indias-extradition-request/articleshow/68337466.cms

Screenshot of the web page (including address bar and extension icons) (required):

Screenshot of the console (press F12 to bring up the console) (required):

Explain what was not right (optional if obvious):

from around the web ads, some of them has legitimate news content and other are purely ads

Reproduction steps (optional if trivial):

going above , scroll down below to see around the web ads

Environment (Required):

• Operating System and Version: win 10
• Browser and Version: firefox 65
• Adblocker and Version: ublock origin 1.18.4

Your filter lists (Required):

the default settings+ those required for nano defender to work(nano defeneder integration,whitelist,nano filters)

Your custom filters (Required if you have any):

Add everything else that you believe to be useful below (optional):

promoted stories over here
https://www.indiatimes.com/news/india/former-navy-chief-writes-to-election-commission-to-stop-misuse-of-armed-forces-in-polls-363444.html

I just found this on AMO uploaded by Fiore https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/nanodefender/ is that the real thing or is it a fork or a scam?

Test link (required):

https://a2zapk.com/608717-stellarium-mobile-free-star-map-1-2-4-a2z.html
https://unlockapk.com/dl3/

Screenshot of the web page (including address bar and extension icons) (required):

Screenshot of the console (press F12 to bring up the console) (required):

Explain what was not right (optional if obvious):

The site is detecting adblocker

Reproduction steps (optional if trivial):

To reproduce this, visit this link as an example: https://a2zapk.com/569808-stellarium-mobile-free-star-map-1-2-6-a2z.html
Click on the "Go To Download Page" and the following page would show Adblock Detect.

Environment (Required):

• Operating System and Version: Windows 10 Pro 1903
• Browser and Version: Firefox Developer Edition 71
• Adblocker and Version: uBlock Origin 1.22.4

Your filter lists (Required):

Your other extensions (Required if you have any):

uMatrix

Add everything else that you believe to be useful below (optional):

Since filter response data have no rules now, minimum version can be relaxed to 56. I plan to deprecate this on GitHub hosted build due to Firefox-specific and unlikely update frequently. These rules if need will goes for AMO version, which Quantum users should migrate to.

Doing so may benefit user stuck at Firefox 56/Waterfox who still using legacy XUL addons while no side effect to existing Quantum users for now, and unlikely in future as well.

Planned to take effect in upcoming version.

Notice that nothing change for version on AMO, and again Quantum users are encouraged migrating to AMO version for taking benefit of post-Quantum Firefox-specific API such as dynamic content script.

It's not creating pull requests anymore.

Test link (required): http://www.expansion.com/fueradeserie/moda-y-caprichos/2019/02/26/5c73e954ca474131758b45af.html?cid=SIN8901

Screenshot of the web page (including address bar and extension icons) (required): https://ibb.co/hcmtdxn

Screenshot of the console (press F12 to bring up the console) (required): https://ibb.co/D1DTTtG

Explain what was not right (optional if obvious):

The page loads normally. Then about 20 secs later, the pop-up appears and I have to reload the page and scroll down again to keep reading for another 20 seconds. Very annoying.

Reproduction steps (optional if trivial):

Environment (Required):

• Operating System and Version: Window 7 SP1 x64
• Browser and Version: Firefox 61.0.2
• Adblocker and Version: uBlock Origin 1.18.4 + Nano Defender 15.0.0.106

Your filter lists (Required): None that I know of, outside of the default settings

Your custom filters (Required if you have any):

Add everything else that you believe to be useful below (optional):

Test link (required):

https://www.boursorama.com/videos/actualites/la-fed-est-elle-vraiment-folle-comme-l-affirme-trump-f5bd59528781f0adda22b85ffac69b7f

Screenshot of the web page (including address bar and extension icons) (required):

https://pasteboard.co/HICoQmH.jpg
Page with ND disabled

Screenshot of the console (press F12 to bring up the console) (required):

https://pasteboard.co/HICkN6B.jpg
Console with ND Enabled

https://pasteboard.co/HICltnG.jpg
Console with ND Disabled

Explain what was not right (optional if obvious):

Enabling ND prevent the embedded videos on site boursorama.com to be played. As soon as I disable ND and reload the pages, the videos can be played.

Reproduction steps (optional if trivial):

Environment (Required):

• Operating System and Version: Win 7 64-bit
• Browser and Version: FF 62
• Adblocker and Version: NanoAdblocker 1.0.0.70

Your filter lists (Required):

Only default settings

Sorry if this is not the appropriate place to ask this but why is the addon unlisted on AMO?

Test link (required):

https://winteriscoming.net/

Screenshot of the web page (including address bar and extension icons) (required):

https://imgur.com/On5uxZF

Screenshot of the console (press F12 to bring up the console) (required):

https://imgur.com/4D5AZvC

Explain what was not right (optional if obvious):

Reproduction steps (optional if trivial):

Environment (Required):

• Operating System and Version: Win10 Pro
• Browser and Version: Firefox 60.1.0esr
• Adblocker and Version: ublock origin 1.16.14

Your filter lists (Required):

List filters you have enabled or disabled from the default settings
uBlock filters​​​​​​​
uBlock filters – Badware risks​
uBlock filters – Privacy​​​​​
uBlock filters – Resource abuse​​​​​
uBlock filters – Unbreak​​​​​
Adblock Warning Removal List​
EasyList​
EasyPrivacy​
Malware Domain List
Malware domains​
​​​​ara: Liste AR​
Nano Defender Integration​​
Nano filters​​
Nano filters - Whitelist​​

Your custom filters (Required if you have any):

Add everything else that you believe to be useful below (optional):

http://strims.world/SkokiKwalifikacje.php?source=1

"BRAK PLAYERA? WYŁĄCZ ADBLOCKA!"

Nano Defender 15.0.0.170
Mozilla Firefox 71.0

uBlock Origin intentionally blocks Adblock Warning Removal List since version 1.29.2:
https://www.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/iruupe/latest_ublock_origin_beta_erased_my_subscribed/

According to the installation instructions for Nano Defender, Adblock Warning Removal List is required for Nano Defender to work:
https://jspenguin2017.github.io/uBlockProtector/

So what does this mean for users of Nano Defender?
Does Nano Defender work without Adblock Warning Removal List without problems?

I use uBlock Origin in the Waterfox browser (Firefox fork) and would like to install Nano Defender too, but for some reason Waterfox reports it as "incompatible". I'd appreciate if it could be make compatible in a future version.

https://www.fcinter1908.it/video/video-presentazione-icardi-psg-inter/?vclk=VideoBar

https://www.fcinter1908.it/copertina/conte-non-salta-fa-bene-addio-pazza-inter/

Is there a way to play these videos?

Would it be possible to provide a "check for update" which would automatically check the github release, if we have to manually update the extension?

Right now, I usually forget to update the extension until I remember to (maybe once a month).

Since the extension isn't on the mozilla store, it would help.

This extension works for me great on Windows 7 pro (64bit) + Firefox 61.0.1 (64bit) and updates itself in Firefox.

On a Windows 10 pro (64bit) system the auto-update in Firefox doesn't work (updates are never found) and even with manually downloading the newest version and installing it, there are problems:
If I click on the newest xpi-file on github and allow Firefox to install the extension from github, then there is a popup in Firefox that says because of a connection error the add-on couldn't be downloaded.
So I always have to download it via right-click first, and then install the new version by double-clicking the downloaded xpi-file.

Title.
I installed Firefox ESR and been importing my stuff from my main installation of Firefox. When the time to install Nano Defender came (turns out I was using it wrong all along, as I thought that I didn't need the NanoDefenderFirefox addon if I used the filterlists for uBO btw), I noticed that I can't update the filterlists in uBO. Judging by how they're being displayed as full links, I'm guessing they're not working at all.

I am following a guide on how to install and in additional stepps the links provided dont open.
How do add them, do i just click the link or do i need to decode the URL and paste it/import in uBlock Origin Filter list ??

https://jspenguin2017.github.io/uBlockProtector/#extra-installation-steps-for-ublock-origin

e.g. https://easylist-downloads.adblockplus.org/antiadblockfilters.txt&title=Adblock%20Warning%20Removal%20List is 404 not found

PLEASE FIRST READ THIS:
https://jspenguin2017.github.io/uBlockProtector/#reporting-an-issue
-->

Test link (required):

Screenshot of the web page (including address bar and extension icons) (required):

Screenshot of the console (press F12 to bring up the console) (required):

Explain what was not right (optional if obvious):

Reproduction steps (optional if trivial):

Environment (Required):

• Operating System and Version:
• Browser and Version:
• Adblocker and Version:
• Nano Defender Version:

Your filter lists (Required):

Your custom filters (Required if you have any):

Your other extensions (Required if you have any):

Add everything else that you believe to be useful below (optional):

Please explain what happens when enabling experimental rules on Nano Defender Firefox.. Or maybe add a (info) icon next to the check box explaining.. Thanks!

Nano Build just updated, please pull the changes before building the next release.

Hello,

Could you please remove console statements (including warnings) from the build file that is being deployed?
I'm pretty sure I've seen it in some policy rules not to spam console with logs.
Imagine if every add-on would be printing there something...

Thank you!
And congratulation for the AMO release! I've been waiting for this a long time.

The site tododvdfull.com hides their free links, like:
https://latinolinks.site/s.php?i=VjJ0YWEyRXlTbk5oTTJ4WVZrWndUbHBXVW5Oa1ZuQklUbFp3YTFZd2NERldNV2hoWVRGYVdGVnFVbFZXUlhCeVdXeEZPVkJSUFQwPQ==
That page, as an example, is an adblock checker, which just forwards to Google.com if detected.
Ublock Origin by itself, on legacy Edge is the only browser that I could get to have that link forward correctly. ABP with generichide/UBO with cosmetic filtering off/UBO with Nano/Edge Chromium/FF won't work. Those just forward to Google.com, instead of this.
Browser console shows:
[Nano] Failed :: FuckAdBlock Defuser :115:13
[Nano] Failed :: Read-only Property window.canRunAds :14:13
[Nano] Failed :: Read-only Property window.canShowAds :14:13
[Nano] Failed :: Read-only Property window.isAdBlockActive :14:13
[Nano] Failed :: Adfly Skipper :65:13
I've trimmed off the tab it was found on, but that specific link came from https://www.tododvdfull.com/collateral-2004bd-25latino/ Click "Descargar", then "Enlaces gratis". Putting screenshots would not help, as the page is just a white screen, before forwarding.

Another Nano failure on Cloudflare DDOS check pages on radikal-gamez.net. The check runs on first visit from a browser without the cookie that gets dropped when you pass it. I think you can trigger the check if you're not a member of the site.
Browser console error debugger opens the page's source to:

<h1><span data-translate="checking_browser">Checking your browser before accessing</span> radikal-gamez.net.</h1>
    
    <div id="no-cookie-warning" data-translate="turn_on_cookies" style="display:none">
      <p data-translate="turn_on_cookies" style="color:#bd2426;">Please enable Cookies and reload the page.</p>
    </div>
    <p data-translate="process_is_automatic">This process is automatic. Your browser will redirect to your requested content shortly.</p>
    <p data-translate="allow_5_secs">Please allow up to 5 seconds&hellip;</p>
  </div>
   <a href="https://madbbs.net/beamy.php?month=321" style="display: none;">table</a>
  <form class="challenge-form" id="challenge-form" action="/threads/far-cry-5-update-1-12-cusa05847-eur-google-drive.50370/?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=34895a3a0e65e346d33893887c39d5cd933a8b12-1598280860-0-AdAYeZWq4N8o_ZnBsOCRygXSIwOEozvFWtC84mgfETKeWKEw9DW63BAFFHQfG14axXHBf8QWqczXXanITlSeoRAy6hH2HU3dyzRKwBb-YhYwLUOy66r8tv6FTUB6zzF9FgUcU2Urf8-EoY7hB4m586Y31O6gXfJe-CB3QdOk_nqIJZUjmJQGeMKgCR8m4yV6EhUJ0XVzhEkCPzPFH4vYdOlY8LeYRcJO_DbX0EOXmmdlTqJIi0g9_kkZEDIPg1mZlcIkSpuvwFpz8ZpACl0tGXD9M9YGuDxImQF_PVAdVBNf1zp58mhPOoKr-lvzmzOZ2VkSC7F_RjKLaE1X3RShMCDf7TaNblhQs6DaVLP9kx19" method="POST" enctype="application/x-www-form-urlencoded">
    <input type="hidden" name="r" value="fe6b3476d742c2da4fd92bec366047c4896f7535-1598280860-0-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"/>
    <input type="hidden" value="a209a6b9dd8b4b512091fd2f143cbf5d" id="jschl-vc" name="jschl_vc"/>
    <!-- <input type="hidden" value="" id="jschl-vc" name="jschl_vc"/> -->
    <input type="hidden" name="pass" value="1598280864.453-NvF+54k/OF"/>
    <input type="hidden" id="jschl-answer" name="jschl_answer"/>
  </form>

Screenshot of the console (press F12 to bring up the console) (required):

See my comment in the link below

Explain what was not right (optional if obvious):

When the resource(s) is/are cached, StreamFilter no longer stream the data of resource. This somehow limit the usage of Firefox resources filtering especially for script which is likely to be cached. A workaround is required to avoid crash due to loaded from cache when using StreamFilter.

Reproduction steps (optional if trivial):

See the link below.

Environment (Required):

• Operating System and Version: Windows 10 / Debian 9.7
• Browser and Version: Firefox 60 ESR, 65.0.1 stable, 66.0.11 beta, 67 Nightly
• Adblocker and Version: Not important

Add everything else that you believe to be useful below (optional):

Browser Bug, just open an issue to alert be caution the use of filterResponseData. Luckily, currently only two rules in total and none of them attempt to cache (at the time of this issue writing).

@LiCybora
@jspenguin2017

Test link (required):

https://multiup.org/en/mirror/0e2b8dd1ac5011a04ca7769a4b27be03/ExtraMovies.wiki_FLM19S02E01.mkv

Screenshot of the web page (including address bar and extension icons) (required):

there is nothing to show

Screenshot of the console (press F12 to bring up the console) (required):

https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/20338483/67745582-9ec8e280-fa4a-11e9-8290-d0c80013a263.png

https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/20338483/67745583-9f617900-fa4a-11e9-8457-c522caaa460b.png

Explain what was not right (optional if obvious):

i am not able to download from file from this site from file servers....ubo strict blocking dialogue comes for multinews,me and never proceeds

Reproduction steps (optional if trivial):

Environment (Required):

• Operating System and Version: win 10
• Browser and Version: firefox 70.0
• Adblocker and Version: ublock origin and nano defender firefox with all default settings

Your filter lists (Required):

the default settings

Test link:

https://www.bdix.org/

Screenshot of the web page (including address bar and extension icons):

Screenshot of the console:

What was not right:

Detect adblock

Environment:

• Operating System and Version: Manjaro Linux
• Browser and Version: Firefox Beta 65.0b11
• Adblocker and Version: uBlock Origin 1.17.4, Nano Defender 15.0.0.85

My filter lists:

Everything else that you believe to be useful below:

This is a private tracker so you might not be able to reproduce because the warning doesn't show up until I log into the site.

https://github.com/MoonchildProductions/UXP/releases/tag/v2018.06.01

Test link (required):

https://whoer.net

Screenshot of the web page (including address bar and extension icons) (required):

https://imgur.com/TEjnGov

Screenshot of the console (press F12 to bring up the console) (required):

https://imgur.com/fImwVjc

Explain what was not right (optional if obvious):

Detects ad block

Reproduction steps (optional if trivial):

Environment (Required):

• Operating System and Version: Win7
• Browser and Version: Firefox 60.4.0esr
• Adblocker and Version: uBlock Origin 1.17.4 & Nano Defender 15.0.0.81

Your filter lists (Required):

https://imgur.com/a/YxaS1P6
https://imgur.com/a/IpbH1XO

Your custom filters (Required if you have any):

Add everything else that you believe to be useful below (optional):

Hi. Why do you keep changing the name of Nano Defender? It used to be called uBlock Protector. You shouldn't change the name of it anymore, because it's confusing for people. Thanks.

Hi. Why doesn't Nano Defender for firefox update automatically, and why isn't it on the firefox add-ons website? Thanks.

Hi,

Just wondering if the Nano Defender for Firefox extension is required, otherwise what does it bring, for Firefox users as myself running uBO.

Wouldn't it be enough (as it was I think several years ago) to simply follow the Extra installation steps for uBlock Origin? which are:

Step 1. Subscribe to Adblock Warning Removal List.
Step 2. Subscribe to Nano Defender Integration filter list.
Step 3. Go to uBlock Origin dashboard, select Settings tab, check I am an advanced user, click the gears icon that shows up, replace unset after userResourcesLocation by: NanoResource

Thanks for info/advice.

https://jspenguin2017.github.io/uBlockProtector/#announcements

I don't have an issue so I apologize for the disturbance, I just couldn't find a more appropriate forum to ask this question in. The descriptions suggest you're still incorporating new pushes to the chromium source and the site calls it an official port, so I'm wondering if this is gonna be a port of the 'pro version' or the 'standard version.' That's all, thanks!

Hi, i hope that you can make a port for firefox android, thank you

two months without updates.
Is the project dead?

This is what #19 appears to be about, to the tee.

Palemoon and Basilisk are two pre-servo forks of firefox, which are used by people who require XUL/NPAPI plugin support. Palemoon, if I recall, totally lacks web extension support, while Basilisk does support basic web extensions, although the packaging for the extension would need to be adjusted.

Nearly all PM/Basilisk users are using some manner of advertisement blocking, so I can only presume that you will get more indecipherable requests.

how to sync or backup addons Nano Defender for Firefox and addons Nano Adblocker Core for Firefox?

Tells me it is incompatible for cyberfox.
I tried all releases on the first page of latest releases 15.0.~
I hope it is possible to work this out.

Thank you for your time and dedication on this project.

Test link (required):

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/05/31/millennials-have-an-average-net-worth-thats-significantly-less-than-previous-generations/?utm_term=.02d6adda163b

Screenshot of the web page (including address bar and extension icons) (required):

Screenshot of the console (press F12 to bring up the console) (required):

Explain what was not right (optional if obvious):

It seems like Defender should prevent this from appearing.

Reproduction steps (optional if trivial):

Visit URL. Nano Adblocker can be enabled or disabled (clicking power icon in extension GUI) and the site's alert will appear.

Environment (Required):

• Mac OS X 10.14.5
• Firefox Nightly (69.0a1 (2019-05-31) (64-bit))
• Nano Defender 15.0.0.147
• Nano Adblocker 1.0.0.112

Your filter lists (Required):

default

Your custom filters (Required if you have any):

none

Your other extensions (Required if you have any):

1Password

Add everything else that you believe to be useful below (optional):

Thank you for your work! 😄 👍

https://www.ohmymag.com/squeezie/squeezie-des-youtubeurs-profiteraient-de-leur-notoriete-pour-avoir-des-rapports-sexuels-avec-des-mineurs_art119888.html?utm_campaign=audiencey&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1533654493

Gentside.com and OHmymag.com

https://imgur.com/X9PvM2b

Test link (required):

https://www.realcleardefense.com/

Screenshot of the web page (including address bar and extension icons) (required):

Screenshot of the console (press F12 to bring up the console) (required):

Explain what was not right (optional if obvious):

Detects ad block and increases 'max article count' per pageview/refresh not even clicked article

Reproduction steps (optional if trivial):

Go to and/or refresh page

Environment (Required):

• Operating System and Version: W10
• Browser and Version: Chrome Version 72.0.3610.2
• Adblocker and Version: uBlock origin 1.17.0 nano defender 15.0.0.78

Your filter lists (Required):

uBlock filters​​​​​
uBlock filters – Badware risks​​​​​
uBlock filters – Privacy​​​​​
uBlock filters – Resource abuse​​​​​
uBlock filters – Unbreak
EasyList​​​​​
EasyPrivacy​​​​​
Malware Domain List​​​​​
Malware domains​​​​​
Peter Lowe’s Ad and tracking server list​​​​​

Your custom filters (Required if you have any):

! 11/16/2018, 3:10:52 PM https://www.forbes.com/sites/lorenthompson/2018/11/15/if-americas-military-loses-world-war-iii-low-readiness-will-likely-be-the-reason/#43db5c486bae
www.forbes.com###brightcove_perform_0_html5_api

! 11/16/2018, 3:11:00 PM https://www.forbes.com/sites/lorenthompson/2018/11/15/if-americas-military-loses-world-war-iii-low-readiness-will-likely-be-the-reason/#43db5c486bae
www.forbes.com###brightcove_perform_0

Imported from AMO review.

Just go to www.as.com , and you'll see the yellow pop-up at the bottom of the page : "You are seeing this message because ad or script blocking software is interfering with this page.
Disable any ad or script blocking software, then reload this page."

I have already reported several issues here. Always with the same browser (FF) and extensions (µBlock Origin, Nano Defender, Privacy Possum...). Sorry but I don't want to be forced to screen cap every time, disable extensions, enable them afterwards, etc..

Thanks for your understanding !

PS : I had the same issue today with www.okdiario.com . Probably because both sites are managed by the same company, which implemented some anti-block software today (I read them every day : yesterday everything was fine, and today both sites have the same pop-up).

https://adf.ly/1UmOZS


It doesn't redirect to the destination page (http://ww25.new.rapeit.net/?z).
Wrong URLs: https://www1.ecleneue.com/pushredirect/?network=2&site=adfly&ppi=10178589&pci=4252004433&t=1567896670&dest=http%3A%2F%2Fnew.rapeit.net%2F
http://larati.net/ad/locked?rndad=2a02a314c53ffd0050ff80de9f57bb69-1567787641&url=1UmOZS&t=s&subid=10178589&h=1
http://larati.net/ad/locked?rndad=2a02a314c53ffd00138d719b19351cc-1567896625&url=1UmOZS&t=s&subid=10178589&h=1
Could you please fix it?

Plz fix this site
https://freedoge.io