Git Product home page Git Product logo

meprop's Introduction

meProp

The codes were used for the paper meProp: Sparsified Back Propagation for Accelerated Deep Learning with Reduced Overfitting (ICML 2017) [pdf] by Xu Sun, Xuancheng Ren, Shuming Ma, Houfeng Wang.

Based on meProp, we further simplify the model by eliminating the rows or columns that are seldom updated, which will reduce the computational cost both in the training and decoding, and potentially accelerate decoding in real-world applications. We name this method meSimp (minimal effort simplification). For more details, please see the paper Training Simplification and Model Simplification for Deep Learning: A Minimal Effort Back Propagation Method [pdf]. The codes are at [here].

Introduction

We propose a simple yet effective technique to simplify the training of neural networks. The technique is based on the top-k selection of the gradients in back propagation.

In back propagation, only a small subset of the full gradient is computed to update the model parameters. The gradient vectors are sparsified in such a way that only the top-k elements (in terms of magnitude) are kept. As a result, only k rows or columns (depending on the layout) of the weight matrix are modified, leading to a linear reduction in the computational cost. We name this method meProp (minimal effort back propagation).

Surprisingly, experimental results demonstrate that most of time we only need to update fewer than 5% of the weights at each back propagation pass. More interestingly, the proposed method improves the accuracy of the resulting models rather than degrades the accuracy, and a detailed analysis is given.

The following figure is an illustration of the idea of meProp.

An illustration of the idea of meProp.

TL;DR: Training with meProp is significantly faster than the original back propagation, and has better accuracy on all of the three tasks we used, Dependency Parsing, POS Tagging and MNIST respectively. The method works with different neural models (MLP and LSTM), with different optimizers (we tested AdaGrad and Adam), with DropOut, and with more hidden layers. The top-k selection works better than the random k-selection, and better than normally-trained k-dimensional network.

Update: Results on test set (please refer to the paper for detailed results and experimental settings):

Method (Adam, CPU) Backprop Time (s) Test (%)
Parsing (MLP 500d) 9,078 89.80
Parsing (meProp top-20) 489 (18.6x) 88.94 (+0.04)
POS-Tag (LSTM 500d) 16,167 97.22
POS-Tag (meProp top-10) 436 (37.1x) 97.25 (+0.03)
MNIST (MLP 500d) 170 98.20
MNIST (meProp top-80) 29 (5.9x) 98.27 (+0.07)

The effect of k, selection (top-k vs. random), and network dimension (top-k vs. k-dimensional):

Effect of k

To achieve speedups on GPUs, a slight change is made to unify the top-k pattern across the mini-batch. The original meProp will cause different top-k patterns across examples of a mini-batch, which will require sparse matrix multiplication. However, sparse matrix multiplication is not very efficient on GPUs compared to dense matrix multiplication on GPUs. Hence, by unifying the top-k pattern, we can extract the parts of the matrices that need computation (dense matrices), get the results, and reconstruct them to the appropriate size for further computation. This leads to actual speedups on GPUs, although we believe if a better method is designed, the speedups on GPUs can be better.

See [pdf] for more details, experimental results, and analysis.

Usage

PyTorch

Requirements

  • Python 3.5
  • PyTorch v0.1.12+ - v0.3.1
  • torchvision
  • CUDA 8.0

Dataset

MNIST: The code will automatically download the dataset and process the dataset (using torchvision). See function get_mnist in the pytorch code for more information.

Run

python3.5 main.py

The code runs unified meProp by default. You could change the lines at the bottom of the main.py to run meProp using sparse matrix multiplication. Or you could pass the arguments through command line.

usage: main.py [-h] [--n_epoch N_EPOCH] [--d_hidden D_HIDDEN]
               [--n_layer N_LAYER] [--d_minibatch D_MINIBATCH]
               [--dropout DROPOUT] [--k K] [--unified] [--no-unified]
               [--random_seed RANDOM_SEED]

optional arguments:
  -h, --help            show this help message and exit
  --n_epoch N_EPOCH     number of training epochs
  --d_hidden D_HIDDEN   dimension of hidden layers
  --n_layer N_LAYER     number of layers, including the output layer
  --d_minibatch D_MINIBATCH
                        size of minibatches
  --dropout DROPOUT     dropout rate
  --k K                 k in meProp (if invalid, e.g. 0, do not use meProp)
  --unified             use unified meProp
  --no-unified          do not use unified meProp
  --random_seed RANDOM_SEED
                        random seed

The results will be written to stdout by default, but you could change the argument file when initializing the TestGroup to write the results to a file.

The code supports simple unified meProp in addition. Please notice, this code will use GPU 0 by default.

C#

Requirements

  • Targeting Microsoft .NET Framework 4.6.1+
  • Compatible versions of Mono should work fine (tested Mono 5.0.1)
  • Developed with Microsoft Visual Studio 2017

Dataset

MNIST: Download from link. Extract the files, and place them at the same location with the executable.

Run

Compile the code first, or use the executable provided in releases.

Then

nnmnist.exe <config.json>

or

mono nnmnist.exe <config.json>

where <config.json> is a configuration file. There is an example configuration file in the source codes. The example configuration file runs the baseline model. Change the NetType to mlptop for experimenting with meProp, and to mlpvar for experimenting with meSimp. The output will be written to a file at the same location with the executable.

The code supports random k selection in addition.

Citation

bibtex:

@InProceedings{sun17meprop,
  title = 	 {me{P}rop: Sparsified Back Propagation for Accelerated Deep Learning with Reduced Overfitting},
  author = 	 {Xu Sun and Xuancheng Ren and Shuming Ma and Houfeng Wang},
  booktitle = 	 {Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning},
  pages = 	 {3299--3308},
  year = 	 {2017},
  volume = 	 {70},
  series = 	 {Proceedings of Machine Learning Research},
  address = 	 {International Convention Centre, Sydney, Australia}
}

meprop's People

Contributors

jklj077 avatar

Stargazers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

Watchers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

meprop's Issues

Regarding the demonstration for faster acceleration results in pytorch

Hi lancopku,

I'm currently implementing your meProp code to understand the flow of the architecture in detail.

However, I couln't see the improved acceleration speed of meprop compared to that of conventional
MLP.

In the table 7 and 8 of paper Sun et al., 2017, pytorch based GPU computation can achieve more faster back-propagation procedure.

Could you please let me know how to implement meprop to show faster backprop computation?

Best,
Seul-Ki

Deeper MLP?

Have you tried on deeper models?

Since each step of backprops, gradients are removed with specific portions(like 5%), Will not the gradient vanish in a deeper neural network model?

Any thoughts?

Error RuntimeError: 2D tensors expected, got 1D

I am trying to integrate meProp into my work, but getting such error. Do you have any idea about this?

    return linearUnified(self.k)(x, self.w, self.b)
 line 39, in forward
    y.addmm_(0, 1, x, w)
RuntimeError: 2D tensors expected, got 1D, 2D tensors at /pytorch/aten/src/THC/generic/THCTensorMathBlas.cu:258

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    ๐Ÿ–– Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ“ˆ๐ŸŽ‰

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.