kkkiio / intellij-protobuf-support Goto Github PK

Hi KKKIIO,
When I use the plugin, I ran into a problem. When I use google/protobuf/empty.go and align at the same time，the following situation occurred:
Before:

    google.protobuf.Empty open_panel = 4;  
    UpStartBattle start_battle = 5;  
    UpEndBattle end_battle = 6;  

After

    google .      protobuf. Empty open_panel       = 4;
    UpStartBattle start_battle                     = 5;
    UpEndBattle   end_battle                       = 6;

google . protobuf. Empty seems did not meet expectations.

plugin addr:
https://plugins.jetbrains.com/plugin/16228-protobuf-support/versions

error:

java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: 'void com.intellij.openapi.extensions.ExtensionPoint.addExtensionPointListener(com.intellij.openapi.extensions.ExtensionPointChangeListener, boolean, com.intellij.openapi.Disposable)'
at idea.plugin.protoeditor.ide.settings.ProjectSettingsConfiguratorManager$ProjectOpenedActivity.runActivity(ProjectSettingsConfiguratorManager.java:119)
at com.intellij.ide.startup.impl.StartupManagerImpl.runActivityAndMeasureDuration(StartupManagerImpl.kt:327)
at com.intellij.ide.startup.impl.StartupManagerImpl.access$runActivityAndMeasureDuration(StartupManagerImpl.kt:72)
at com.intellij.ide.startup.impl.StartupManagerImpl$runPostStartupActivities$4$2.invoke$lambda$0(StartupManagerImpl.kt:280)
at com.intellij.util.concurrency.ContextRunnable.run(ContextRunnable.java:24)
at com.intellij.openapi.project.SmartModeScheduler$addLast$1.invoke(SmartModeScheduler.kt:89)
at com.intellij.openapi.project.SmartModeScheduler$addLast$1.invoke(SmartModeScheduler.kt:89)
at com.intellij.openapi.project.SmartModeScheduler.addLast$lambda$0(SmartModeScheduler.kt:89)
at com.intellij.openapi.project.SmartModeScheduler$RunnableDelegate.run(SmartModeScheduler.kt:49)
at com.intellij.openapi.project.SmartModeScheduler.doRun(SmartModeScheduler.kt:137)
at com.intellij.openapi.project.SmartModeScheduler.runAllWhileSmart(SmartModeScheduler.kt:129)
at com.intellij.openapi.application.TransactionGuardImpl.runWithWritingAllowed(TransactionGuardImpl.java:208)
at com.intellij.openapi.application.TransactionGuardImpl.access$100(TransactionGuardImpl.java:21)
at com.intellij.openapi.application.TransactionGuardImpl$1.run(TransactionGuardImpl.java:190)
at com.intellij.openapi.application.impl.ApplicationImpl.runIntendedWriteActionOnCurrentThread(ApplicationImpl.java:861)
at com.intellij.openapi.application.impl.ApplicationImpl$4.run(ApplicationImpl.java:478)
at com.intellij.openapi.application.impl.FlushQueue.doRun(FlushQueue.java:79)
at com.intellij.openapi.application.impl.FlushQueue.runNextEvent(FlushQueue.java:121)
at com.intellij.openapi.application.impl.FlushQueue.flushNow(FlushQueue.java:41)
at java.desktop/java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.dispatch(InvocationEvent.java:318)
at java.desktop/java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEventImpl(EventQueue.java:792)
at java.desktop/java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(EventQueue.java:739)
at java.desktop/java.awt.EventQueue$3.run(EventQueue.java:733)
at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:399)
at java.base/java.security.ProtectionDomain$JavaSecurityAccessImpl.doIntersectionPrivilege(ProtectionDomain.java:86)
at java.desktop/java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:761)
at com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue.defaultDispatchEvent(IdeEventQueue.kt:690)
at com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue._dispatchEvent$lambda$10(IdeEventQueue.kt:593)
at com.intellij.openapi.application.impl.ApplicationImpl.runWithoutImplicitRead(ApplicationImpl.java:1485)
at com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue._dispatchEvent(IdeEventQueue.kt:593)
at com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue.access$_dispatchEvent(IdeEventQueue.kt:67)
at com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue$dispatchEvent$processEventRunnable$1$1$1.compute(IdeEventQueue.kt:369)
at com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue$dispatchEvent$processEventRunnable$1$1$1.compute(IdeEventQueue.kt:368)
at com.intellij.openapi.progress.impl.CoreProgressManager.computePrioritized(CoreProgressManager.java:787)
at com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue$dispatchEvent$processEventRunnable$1$1.invoke(IdeEventQueue.kt:368)
at com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue$dispatchEvent$processEventRunnable$1$1.invoke(IdeEventQueue.kt:363)
at com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueueKt.performActivity$lambda$1(IdeEventQueue.kt:997)
at com.intellij.openapi.application.TransactionGuardImpl.performActivity(TransactionGuardImpl.java:105)
at com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueueKt.performActivity(IdeEventQueue.kt:997)
at com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue.dispatchEvent$lambda$7(IdeEventQueue.kt:363)
at com.intellij.openapi.application.impl.ApplicationImpl.runIntendedWriteActionOnCurrentThread(ApplicationImpl.java:861)
at com.intellij.ide.IdeEventQueue.dispatchEvent(IdeEventQueue.kt:405)
at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForFilters(EventDispatchThread.java:207)
at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForFilter(EventDispatchThread.java:128)
at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:117)
at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:113)
at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:105)
at java.desktop/java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:92)

Now the enumeration looks like this:

enum Result {
  SUCCESS = 0;
  FAIL = 1;
}

It might be better:

enum Result {
  SUCCESS = 0;
  FAIL    = 1;
}

Can you release a new version with recent fixes? Thanks a lot!

Starting with version 3.15 of protobuf, proto3 supports the use of optional keywords (just like in proto2) to provide information about the appearance of scalar fields.

It is not supported in intellij-protobuf-support right now.

The plugin always converts the Map From

 map<uint32, bool>       monsters       = 3; 

To

 map< uint32, bool>        monsters       = 3;

with an extra space.
The official example is similar to the first one：
https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/proto3#maps