flake8 generates 429 undefined names when linting this repo... How do all of those constants actually get generated?

flake8 testing of https://github.com/jtolds/pynarcissus on Python 2.7.13

$ flake8 . --count --select=E901,E999,F821,F822,F823 --show-source --statistics

./jsparser.py:207:49: F821 undefined name 'END'
    done = property(lambda self: self.peek() == END)
                                                ^

./jsparser.py:223:22: F821 undefined name 'NEWLINE'
                tt = NEWLINE
                     ^
__...__

it would be a great help to have the option for the parser to output to JSON

i have tried a few different methods to achieve this but all seem to output invalid JSON

i am at a loss at this point, and i only thought to put up an issue because i saw you added the python3 port, which i was previously doing myself, some two weeks ago

by requesting directly i was hoping that the effort would be a superficial addition for the creator and maintainer

if you think it would be too much work, i'd be happy to do it myself if you could offer a suggestion of how you would tackle the problem

thanks,

here are my attempts:

• i took the return value for parse() and created a function that descends through the class structure returning values based on their type: 'str', 'int', 'bool', 'NoneType', 'list', 'dict', 'main.Node', 'main.Tokenizer', 'main.Object'; but the returned object is missing some properties in the classes, ie 'type', while retaining others like 'type_', also tokenizer always contains the same values
• i took the output of the str function that the program prints to stdout, removed the clear and copy functions and the tokenizer: [object Object], then tried to manually add in double quotes where necessary to make the output a valid JSON object.. a few problems here, first off ignoring the tokenizer object seems like i am missing out on vital information, and the other problem was that sometimes there is "value" : "{" and sometimes there is "value" : { .. }, after completing the work the JSON was invalid
• assuming the issue lied in the "value" : { .. } issue i resolved to add a new function identical the the str function but instead of printing just %s values, it would print "%s" where necessary.. now, i could differentiate between "value": "{" and "value" : "{ .. }" but i would have to go through and manually remove the quotes around objects.. after doing so the JSON was invalid

What steps will reproduce the problem?
Run:
    echo a ? b ? c : d : e | python sexp.py

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

It should be equivalent to
    echo a ? (b ? c : d) : e | python sexp.py

, i.e.:

    (SCRIPT
      (TERNARY a (TERNARY b c d) e))

however, instead I get:

    (SCRIPT
      (TERNARY a b (TERNARY c d e)))

which is the same as

    echo (a ? b : c) ? d : e | python sexp.py

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 24 Jan 2014 at 9:29

First of all I really appreciate all the work you've done so far for this port.

The problem: When passing a string containing non-ascii characters the
tokenizer throws a `UnicodeEncodeError` at line 197.

I solved that with removing the `str`-cast in this line but perhaps you
want to do an instance check for `basestring` here.

BTW: It would be great if you could manage to implement the `jsexec` part
somehow... :)

Cheers

Sebastian

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 13 Dec 2009 at 1:42

What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Parse a comma expression with more than 2 sub-expression

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

OtherError, 2 out of 3 subnodes checked.

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?

r17, Windows with Python 2.7

Please provide any additional information below.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 29 Dec 2013 at 6:09

Attachments:

• fix-comma-expr.patch

nested functions cause script failure on line 1058 of jsparser3.py :
while (operators and opPrecedence.get(operators[-1].type_) > opPrecedence[NEW]):

easily repeatable, here's the js file i created to get the error message below :

//fakejs.js
function isnumber(numb) {
return !isNaN(parseFloat(numb) && isFinite(numb)
}

error message :

./jsparser3.py ../fakejs.js
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./jsparser3.py", line 1146, in
print(str(parse(open(sys.argv[1]).read(),sys.argv[1])))
File "./jsparser3.py", line 1140, in parse
n = Script(t, x)
File "./jsparser3.py", line 363, in Script
n = Statements(t, x)
File "./jsparser3.py", line 474, in Statements
n.append(Statement(t, x))
File "./jsparser3.py", line 498, in Statement
return FunctionDefinition(t, x, True, type_)
File "./jsparser3.py", line 757, in FunctionDefinition
f.body = Script(t, x2)
File "./jsparser3.py", line 363, in Script
n = Statements(t, x)
File "./jsparser3.py", line 474, in Statements
n.append(Statement(t, x))
File "./jsparser3.py", line 682, in Statement
n.value = Expression(t, x)
File "./jsparser3.py", line 1058, in Expression
opPrecedence[NEW]):
TypeError: unorderable types: NoneType() > int()