in https://github.com/shinnn/spdx-license-ids/blob/master/index.json the license ids appear to be sorted alphabetically however the MIT entry is not first in the MIT* family of ids. It would just be handy if they were already sorted.

There is some additional metadata contained within the SPDX License list: FSF Free/Libre and OSI Approved.

As a user building something around spdx-license-ids, it would be stellar if these were additional exports from the module that followed a similar model to spdx-license-ids/deprecated:

const freeSoftwareLicenses = require('spdx-license-ids/fsf')
const osiApprovedLicenses = require('spdx-license-ids/osi')

If this is something you're interested in, I'd be happy to try to contribute it @shinnn ❤️

I hope you can change your license to MIT or any license other than CCO.

I have created a set of types for spdx-license-list. Would you prefer I add them to this repository via a PR or create a @types/spdx-license-list package via DefinitelyTyped?

I am just curious, what was the reason to make 2589d34 happen?

I was about to request changing to MIT license from Unlicense, but instead opened this question...

Hello 🔆

It would be great if spdx-license-ids becomes compatible with Node module, e.g:

import ids from 'spdx-license-ids';

For now, import assertions are experimental and not recommended in production environments.

You could use it here or deprecate this module in favor of it.

See: https://github.com/sindresorhus/spdx-license-list/releases/tag/v3.0.0

It would be ideal if the docs for this package included the version of the SPDX license list that's being offered by the library. As of 2017-03-02, this is v2.6.

New deprecated license that ends with + are missing in the list of deprecated license.

MR

main currently shows that this package is at v3.0.10:

Should ac5d871 from the v3.0.10 tag be in main as well?

Hello, can you confirm which licence applies to this component or add the licence file? Thanks

@shinnn might you add me, kemitchell, as a publisher of this package to the public registry?

https://www.npmjs.com/package/spdx-license-ids

In the project https://github.com/clearlydefined we currently only have a notion of a component missing a license. However, there are components that are not missing licenses, they in fact have no license. We want to implement a way to support that and display it to the user. These options from the licence picker (on our side) are coming directly from here and so the ask is:
Can we please get these 2 options (NONE and NOASSERTION) added ?