Very long load times for accounts with many splits about gnucash-web HOT 3 OPEN

I am aware of the slow performance on large accounts. I have also noticed that on PostgreSQL (though I also suspect that that particular database server is also pretty slow). This is something I am continously investigating, but will have to look into furher. Never had a timeout though. Guess that depends on the database engine. My biggest account is ~1200 transactions.

One of the reasons (I think) is that even though the ledgers are paginated, the backend code still loads all of the splits from the DB and only sorts and filters in the template, see account.j2:75). But even then, sorting a 3500 element list shouldn't take very long.

I'm not sure how to improve on this. Piecash does not (I think) support retrieving only a part of the splits (docs). The best way would be to do the sorting and filtering in the SQL query to reduce the number of loaded results in the first place (if that is in fact the issue here).

On display of the transactions (transaction.j2), only the splits and contra-accounts are accessed, so I see no possible bottlenecks here. I will have to look at the piecash implementation to find out more.

Next step for me is trying out with different databases on different hosts.

Do you really have slow performance (several seconds load time) on any account? Even on smaller ones? With sqlite with my testing dbs I never had any issues (see e.g. https://gnucash-web-demo.bachmeier.cc which runs on PostgreSQL).

I will continue to work on this, but if you find out anything, please let me know!

This issue will serve as the tracking place for load time improvements.

from gnucash-web.

I just tried this out for the first time yesterday and had a similar experience. I built a docker arm image for rpi. The sample sqlite data was loading just fine in the web ui but when I tried using my own gnucash data file (also sqlite with several larger accounts) I couldn't get most of the accounts to load. Haven't gathered as much info as @williamjacksn but I'll be happy to report my findings in case it helps find a common denominator. At first I was suspicious of the arm platform and was going to try on x86_64 next to see if the same thing happens.

Thanks for your work on this @joshuabach, it's a really neat project.

from gnucash-web.

quick update on my end...I did try the latest x86_64 docker image 'out-of-the-box' and found much better performance than on the rpi. The larger accounts are still loading a bit slowly, but it takes at most 4-5 seconds (my arm image was much slower). I do see where there is still room for improvement on x86_64, but as expected, architecture will make a difference too

from gnucash-web.