adjustable noise center about urh HOT 4 CLOSED

For the noise it does not really make sense to have a configurable center although I get where you are coming from. Let me give you a short break-down of how URH handles noise behind the scenes to make this more clear.

1. URH calculates the magnitude of the signal i.e. we end up with values >= 0 over time
2. Every sample with a magnitude lower than the configured noise_threshold is considered noise and it's magnitude set to 0. You can visualize the noise threshold as a straight line that goes from left to right through the magnitudes.
3. Draw the original signal after cutting off noise

Note, the noise_threshold is not used at all in the analog view where it is drawn that's probably the source of confusion: The red noise area we draw in URH is just an approximate visualization.
The correct visualization would be to draw the magnitudes over time as outlined in point 2 and let the noise threshold go from left to right.

What you can try in your case is:

1. Lower the noise threshold (although in the screenshot there is just a straight line visible which seems odd)
2. Use the spectrogram view and apply a bandpass filter
3. Re-record the signal with a higher gain

from urh.

Hey Moritz,

the important part of a signal is of course the data. You need a solid SNR to differentiate the data from noise and that is where URHs noise filter comes into play. Usually data and noise have the same center unless you do not have more than one channel, so there is no need to set a second center for the noise. In case you have more than one channel, you can extract single channels using the Spectogram view.
If you like to discuss such things with us, please join our slack channel. Sometimes a dialog helps!
Please close the issue if your question is solved.

Best regards
Andreas

from urh.

Sounds good, i will say hi in the slack after work!

Though I think there is a small misunderstanding.:

Usually data and noise have the same center

agreed!

so there is no need to set a second center for the noise

maybe better to say: a second center to set for the analog signal (amplitude over time) as opposed to the center of the demodulated signal (frequency over time) does that make sense?

from urh.

Hi,

Thanks for the very helpful post!
You guessed exactly right that the visualization was throwing me off.

Also thanks for the advice.
I didn't know there is way to apply a bandpass filter! I still coudn't find it untill I googled and found it mentioned in the URH paper... I have to admit i didn't read it 😔
Regarding the straight line: I panned to an are where there is no signal to visualize how the 0-line is claerly not in the center of the noise. I understand now that that doesn't mean anything

from urh.