Comments (12)
Honestly the RO list needs an overhaul anyway and anyone not active in the last 2 months should be removed. I would be fine with stepping down as well if people want me to and new people (the ones active now) should take charge of managing the community.
As much as I would love to have Octavian/Jan/Denys/Ben/Eva and the rest of the gang active that ship has sailed years ago and we old folk should make way for new leadership.
from culture.
https://chat.stackoverflow.com/transcript/message/48034105#48034105
from culture.
I already said that I have no objection in being removed if it seems I'm in the way of a new leadership.
The new leadership of SO made me stop answering questions already...
from culture.
We should open a new issue for the topic of New Management. I think we can safely call this proposal separate from that (much larger) one.
from culture.
I went ahead and made this happen since no one opposed it, feel free to open another issue if this needs to be revisited.
from culture.
I think in this case, this is more than just a vote for RO access for a bot, it's a vote for RO access to both the bot and the person running it... because at that point they are an RO, as they own/control both accounts. It doesn't really make sense in my opinion to do one without the other.
from culture.
That said...
I don't think moving poorly formatted code to the trash is as important as it used to be, due to how little activity the room gets now.
from culture.
@tentonaxe I think you make a very good point here. By giving RO to the bot user your are effectively giving me RO. However, I would like to point out an important distinction between my user (@jbis) and bot user (@Jamesbot) getting RO.
As I see it, voting for someone to become RO comes with two main components. You trust that person not to abuse their power and also that they will be an effective and fair moderator. They are there to help settle disputes if they arise and have the power to kick someone and even disable to room temporarily if necessary.
By voting only for Jame's user (and not me) to become RO, you are trusting that I won't abuse the power of RO through Jame's user. However, it does not mean (or at least I don't see myself this way) that I have any more authority than a regular user. I am equal to a non RO user. Assuming you trust me not to abuse my power, I see a distinction between me being RO and James being RO.
That being said, with the loss of a couple ROs, I am willing to become a RO. I am not sure if other RO's want that. Most of the people voting on this have will have interacted with me at some point and have seen me interact with others so I see no reason to explain why I think I would be a good RO. That is for you all to decide.
from culture.
+1 for James and Josh being distinct users that I don't expect to overlap. I say we make an existing RO (Kevin?) a joint owner of the James repository and account credentials, to discourage abuse.
I don't really think we need any new actual ROs; whenever there's a problem, it's easy enough to ping someone else to take care of it. But I did encounter someone post unformatted code that James caught but couldn't do anything about (and was therefore left unchanged) within the last hour. It's annoying.
from culture.
Giving me access to the repo wouldn't do much, i'm too lazy for that to make any difference, bsides, ownership of it isn't required to see/monitor it.
from culture.
Hey... I'm not so old!
from culture.
lmao, I misrecognized the issue I was commenting to, but glad you took it in a fun way.
shouldn't have deleted that comment either now that I think of it, mb :P
from culture.
Related Issues (20)
- Discouraging specific discussions of illegal topics HOT 17
- ROs should ignore users when incapable of being objective HOT 11
- Duggers trolling HOT 7
- Kamil Solecki for RO HOT 12
- RO HOT 2
- Open door. Let's have a discussion HOT 9
- Oliver Salzburg RO nomination HOT 18
- Make the Room a Gallery HOT 39
- Rooms can now be frozen by owners HOT 8
- Mods banned me even when two said more than that HOT 22
- Why I got banned? HOT 5
- Read Only ROs HOT 3
- blank issue HOT 1
- KarelG HOT 3
- I'd like to nominate Jhawins for RO HOT 30
- Denys has no business being a RO HOT 7
- Tom Minor as RO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HOT 8
- Adding "HTML / CSS / Web Development" to our title and scope description HOT 8
- JBis For RO HOT 3
Recommend Projects
-
React
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
-
Vue.js
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
-
Typescript
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
-
TensorFlow
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
-
Django
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
-
Laravel
A PHP framework for web artisans
-
D3
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
-
Recommend Topics
-
javascript
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
-
web
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
-
server
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
-
Machine learning
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
-
Visualization
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
-
Game
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
Recommend Org
-
Facebook
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
-
Microsoft
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
-
Google
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
-
Alibaba
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
-
D3
Data-Driven Documents codes.
-
Tencent
China tencent open source team.
from culture.