Git Product home page Git Product logo

kubesnap's People

Contributors

andrzej-k avatar euank avatar izabellaraulin avatar jcooklin avatar jose5918 avatar katarzyna-z avatar lynxbat avatar marcin-krolik avatar marcin-ol avatar marcintao avatar mkleina avatar nanliu avatar patrykmatyjasek avatar rdower avatar

Stargazers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

Watchers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

kubesnap's Issues

Network stats

What is the difference between network stats under "network" and those under "network"->"interfaces"? Why this one interface is reported in section "network"?

 "network": {
  "name": "enp4s0f1",
  "rx_bytes": 12124592136,
  "rx_packets": 21675552,
  "rx_errors": 0,
  "rx_dropped": 0,
  "tx_bytes": 3935774766,
  "tx_packets": 5334828,
  "tx_errors": 0,
  "tx_dropped": 0,
  "interfaces": [
   {
    "name": "enp4s0f1",
    "rx_bytes": 12124592136,
    "rx_packets": 21675552,
    "rx_errors": 0,
    "rx_dropped": 0,
    "tx_bytes": 3935774766,
    "tx_packets": 5334828,
    "tx_errors": 0,
    "tx_dropped": 0
   },
   {
    "name": "flannel.1",
    "rx_bytes": 6263507721,
    "rx_packets": 4596302,
    "rx_errors": 0,
    "rx_dropped": 0,
    "tx_bytes": 2353793829,
    "tx_packets": 608371,
    "tx_errors": 0,
    "tx_dropped": 8
   },
   {
    "name": "eth2",
    "rx_bytes": 0,
    "rx_packets": 0,
    "rx_errors": 0,
    "rx_dropped": 0,
    "tx_bytes": 0,
    "tx_packets": 0,
    "tx_errors": 0,
    "tx_dropped": 0
   },

Issue with reporting CPU utilization

When using workload (src/workload) which is running stress on dedicated number of cores metrics for CPU utilization seems to be incorrect. For a container with CPU limit of 5k milicores and request of 1k milicores when stress is run on 2 cores (2k milicores) it's seen that metrics for CPU utilization have strange values (like negative values, or very high values - like 15k milicores). This causes horizontal pod autoscaler to behave incorrectly - logic seems right but the data are causing unnecessary pods creation or deletion.

Compare/contrast with Prometheus

I enjoyed your recent post on Medium The benefits of using Snap with Kubernetes, but I'm left wondering what the differences are with the other popular Kubernetes metrics framework: prometheus.io?

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    ๐Ÿ–– Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ“ˆ๐ŸŽ‰

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.